RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      19세기 전반 勢道政治의 형성과 政治運營 = The Formation of Sedo-Politics(勢道政治) and Political Management in the early 19th Century

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76535948

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Joseon's sedo politics(勢道政治)?a type of political mechanism that was controlled by some powerful family clans?developed during the early 19th century. While those involved with sedo politics adopted the advantages of the Tangpyeong policy(蕩平策, policy of impartiality), they also distorted it in order to preserve their families' political power. The Tangpyeong policy was first established in the 18th century by King Yeongjo(英祖) and King Jeongjo(正祖) as a means of carrying out a comprehensive socialreform.
      However, after the death of King Jeongjo, certain powerful clans ceased to support the reform efforts which he had undertaken, and formed the so-called sedo politics structure by placing more emphasis on the principles of righteousness and reason(義理論) as developed by the Chu Hsi school of thought(朱子學 義理論). Political theories such as that of the virtuous monarch(君主聖學論), moralistic politics(世道政治論), and governance through moral practices(道學的 經世論) were also used to justify sedo politics. While the political structure based on such theories was first formed during the 17th century, it found itself under attack in the 18th century as a result of the emergence of the above-mentioned Tangpyeong policy and widespread reform efforts. However, tlrshis structure was resuscitated in the 19th century through the formation of sedo politics by a few politically powerful families.
      These political principles were combined with a centralized bureaucratic system centered on the Bibyeonsa(Border Defense Council), whose own power was strengthened during the 18th century. As a result, sedo politics deepened the inherent contradictions within Joseon's feudal system, eventually leading to the emergence of peasant uprisings. The peasant uprisings of 1862 were a historical event which proved that these political principles were in fact obstacles to progress. In response to this national crisis, the Joseon government established a tax reform policy(三政釐正策) designed to equalize the tax burdens. This turn of events sheds some light on the role which the resistance of the people(民) played in overcoming such governance theories based on the principles of righteousness and reason(義理論).
      번역하기

      Joseon's sedo politics(勢道政治)?a type of political mechanism that was controlled by some powerful family clans?developed during the early 19th century. While those involved with sedo politics adopted the advantages of the Tangpyeong policy(蕩...

      Joseon's sedo politics(勢道政治)?a type of political mechanism that was controlled by some powerful family clans?developed during the early 19th century. While those involved with sedo politics adopted the advantages of the Tangpyeong policy(蕩平策, policy of impartiality), they also distorted it in order to preserve their families' political power. The Tangpyeong policy was first established in the 18th century by King Yeongjo(英祖) and King Jeongjo(正祖) as a means of carrying out a comprehensive socialreform.
      However, after the death of King Jeongjo, certain powerful clans ceased to support the reform efforts which he had undertaken, and formed the so-called sedo politics structure by placing more emphasis on the principles of righteousness and reason(義理論) as developed by the Chu Hsi school of thought(朱子學 義理論). Political theories such as that of the virtuous monarch(君主聖學論), moralistic politics(世道政治論), and governance through moral practices(道學的 經世論) were also used to justify sedo politics. While the political structure based on such theories was first formed during the 17th century, it found itself under attack in the 18th century as a result of the emergence of the above-mentioned Tangpyeong policy and widespread reform efforts. However, tlrshis structure was resuscitated in the 19th century through the formation of sedo politics by a few politically powerful families.
      These political principles were combined with a centralized bureaucratic system centered on the Bibyeonsa(Border Defense Council), whose own power was strengthened during the 18th century. As a result, sedo politics deepened the inherent contradictions within Joseon's feudal system, eventually leading to the emergence of peasant uprisings. The peasant uprisings of 1862 were a historical event which proved that these political principles were in fact obstacles to progress. In response to this national crisis, the Joseon government established a tax reform policy(三政釐正策) designed to equalize the tax burdens. This turn of events sheds some light on the role which the resistance of the people(民) played in overcoming such governance theories based on the principles of righteousness and reason(義理論).

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 서론
      • Ⅱ. 18세기 蕩平政治의 성과와 한계
      • Ⅲ. 19세기 전반 勢道政治의 형성과 전개
      • Ⅳ. 결론
      • 〈ABSTRACT〉
      • Ⅰ. 서론
      • Ⅱ. 18세기 蕩平政治의 성과와 한계
      • Ⅲ. 19세기 전반 勢道政治의 형성과 전개
      • Ⅳ. 결론
      • 〈ABSTRACT〉
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2020 평가예정 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
      2015-01-01 평가 우수등재학술지 선정 (재인증)
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      1999-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.15 1.15 1.21
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.21 1.16 2.615 0.53
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼