RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI우수등재

    드라마 산업의 마인드 셋(MindSets) 탐구 = 온라인 드라마 커뮤니티와 스타(Stars)의 합주(合奏)

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100856893

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    In spite of its significance, drama industry has not received much attention from management researchers. There are very few studies of drama industry to date and even fewer that directly address the managerial issues confronting producers in the industry. The explanation for this neglect is rooted in how management scholars regard entertainment industries. Drama industry is clearly different from most other industries: Its products evoke intensely private experience, and they tap values and aspirations that are neither utilitarian nor commercial. Therefore, understanding the audiences’ mindsets is an important ingredient in understanding the drama industry. Rather than focusing on the contents or the audiences’ characteristics, this study examines the process of decision-making for viewing drama, which is rare in previous researches. As dramas are experience products, audiences find it difficult to judge their pre-consumption quality. According to prior research on decision-making, audiences’ information on a specific drama is the most important factor they consider in deciding to view the drama. The arguments presume that audiences should have stored some information about the drama by their own experience or through the help of others (vicarious experience). To decide whether to view a particular new drama, audiences often rely on information provided by online drama community (ODC). ODC is likely to be especially important for audiences because it offers vicarious experience on sensory aspects not conveyed by tangible attributes. Participating in an ODC provides audiences with opportunities to share their passionate feelings and tastes. The audiences also discuss the content of dramas’ thematic categories, meanings, and overall quality. The assessment of specific dramas can easily be disseminated to the offline communities to inform other like-minded audiences because they perceive the online community members’ comments on the drama as credible information. Thus, online world-of-mouth (WOM) can reach limitless individuals, making it a far more powerful weapon against producers than traditional WOM, which is likely to only reach a small number of friends or family. Prior research has not investigated the influence of that factor on the performance of an individual drama. To fill the research gap, this study investigates the influence of ODC on drama ratings. In deciding whether to watch a specific drama, audiences try to estimate the magnitude of enjoyment they are likely to obtain from viewing that drama. The greater the expected enjoyment, the higher the likelihood of viewing that specific drama. One of the most important factors that can be considered in estimating a drama’s enjoyment value is its featuring of stars. There is a greater possibility of viewing a drama if an audience likes its actors/actresses. The liking of specific actors/actresses presumes that an audience has somewhat stored information about them in his/her memory. Usually, the audience is likely to have clear expectations about dramas with stars because past information on the stars provides a basis for one’s expectations and attitudes. However, empirical results of the influence of star power on a drama’s performance are conflicting. The lack of a star-power effect has been reported on several studies. Mixed results about the impacts of stars on drama are possible because the audience’s possible negative word-of-mouth might mitigate the influences of star power on a drama’s performance. The mixed results suggest that audiences’ reliance on star power would vary depending upon the availability of complementary information on the drama. Audiences with experience on the stars want to ascertain their judgment on the drama viewing by complementing the information about the drama attributes from outside sources like ODC. Also, audiences who have gained knowledge about a specific drama from ODC tend to be more assured if they have stored knowledge on stars
    번역하기

    In spite of its significance, drama industry has not received much attention from management researchers. There are very few studies of drama industry to date and even fewer that directly address the managerial issues confronting producers in the indu...

    In spite of its significance, drama industry has not received much attention from management researchers. There are very few studies of drama industry to date and even fewer that directly address the managerial issues confronting producers in the industry. The explanation for this neglect is rooted in how management scholars regard entertainment industries. Drama industry is clearly different from most other industries: Its products evoke intensely private experience, and they tap values and aspirations that are neither utilitarian nor commercial. Therefore, understanding the audiences’ mindsets is an important ingredient in understanding the drama industry. Rather than focusing on the contents or the audiences’ characteristics, this study examines the process of decision-making for viewing drama, which is rare in previous researches. As dramas are experience products, audiences find it difficult to judge their pre-consumption quality. According to prior research on decision-making, audiences’ information on a specific drama is the most important factor they consider in deciding to view the drama. The arguments presume that audiences should have stored some information about the drama by their own experience or through the help of others (vicarious experience). To decide whether to view a particular new drama, audiences often rely on information provided by online drama community (ODC). ODC is likely to be especially important for audiences because it offers vicarious experience on sensory aspects not conveyed by tangible attributes. Participating in an ODC provides audiences with opportunities to share their passionate feelings and tastes. The audiences also discuss the content of dramas’ thematic categories, meanings, and overall quality. The assessment of specific dramas can easily be disseminated to the offline communities to inform other like-minded audiences because they perceive the online community members’ comments on the drama as credible information. Thus, online world-of-mouth (WOM) can reach limitless individuals, making it a far more powerful weapon against producers than traditional WOM, which is likely to only reach a small number of friends or family. Prior research has not investigated the influence of that factor on the performance of an individual drama. To fill the research gap, this study investigates the influence of ODC on drama ratings. In deciding whether to watch a specific drama, audiences try to estimate the magnitude of enjoyment they are likely to obtain from viewing that drama. The greater the expected enjoyment, the higher the likelihood of viewing that specific drama. One of the most important factors that can be considered in estimating a drama’s enjoyment value is its featuring of stars. There is a greater possibility of viewing a drama if an audience likes its actors/actresses. The liking of specific actors/actresses presumes that an audience has somewhat stored information about them in his/her memory. Usually, the audience is likely to have clear expectations about dramas with stars because past information on the stars provides a basis for one’s expectations and attitudes. However, empirical results of the influence of star power on a drama’s performance are conflicting. The lack of a star-power effect has been reported on several studies. Mixed results about the impacts of stars on drama are possible because the audience’s possible negative word-of-mouth might mitigate the influences of star power on a drama’s performance. The mixed results suggest that audiences’ reliance on star power would vary depending upon the availability of complementary information on the drama. Audiences with experience on the stars want to ascertain their judgment on the drama viewing by complementing the information about the drama attributes from outside sources like ODC. Also, audiences who have gained knowledge about a specific drama from ODC tend to be more assured if they have stored knowledge on stars

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 이장우, "한류드라마 콘텐츠의 국제경쟁력과 해외진출 전략" 한국경영학회 36 (36): 1419-1447, 2007

    2 정진욱, "한국의 TV 시청 유형 분석 및 시청자 유형별 시청률 예측 모형" 10 (10): 37-52, 2003

    3 유현석, "한국영화의 흥행 요인에 관한 연구제작 관련 변수를 중심으로" 한국언론학회 46 (46): 6-213, 2002

    4 박문선, "한국 영화제작 네트워크의 역할 역동성에 관한 연구: 2001년-2006년 시기" 한국경영학회 37 (37): 1631-1649, 2008

    5 김휴종, "한국 영화 스타의 스타파워 분석" 1 (1): 165-200, 1998

    6 심미선, "프라임타임대 지상파 텔레비전 프로그램 선택에 영향을 미치는 요인에 관한 연구" 한국언론학회 46 (46): 6-216, 2002

    7 황하성, "텔레비전 시청만족도 형성에 관한 재고찰시청동기, 의사인간관계(para?social interaction),실재감(presence)의 상호작용을 중심으로" 한국방송학회 21 (21): 342-382, 2007

    8 이호준, "텔레비전 수용자의 프로그램 평가와 장르 인식" 한국방송학회 22 (22): 169-214, 2008

    9 조항제, "텔레비전 멜로드라마에서 나타나는 가족 표현의 변화<하늘이시여>와 <굿바이 솔로>를 중심으로" 한국방송학회 21 (21): 574-617, 2007

    10 김대호, "케이블 채널 사업의 시장성과에 관한 검토" 45 (45): 39-68, 2001

    1 이장우, "한류드라마 콘텐츠의 국제경쟁력과 해외진출 전략" 한국경영학회 36 (36): 1419-1447, 2007

    2 정진욱, "한국의 TV 시청 유형 분석 및 시청자 유형별 시청률 예측 모형" 10 (10): 37-52, 2003

    3 유현석, "한국영화의 흥행 요인에 관한 연구제작 관련 변수를 중심으로" 한국언론학회 46 (46): 6-213, 2002

    4 박문선, "한국 영화제작 네트워크의 역할 역동성에 관한 연구: 2001년-2006년 시기" 한국경영학회 37 (37): 1631-1649, 2008

    5 김휴종, "한국 영화 스타의 스타파워 분석" 1 (1): 165-200, 1998

    6 심미선, "프라임타임대 지상파 텔레비전 프로그램 선택에 영향을 미치는 요인에 관한 연구" 한국언론학회 46 (46): 6-216, 2002

    7 황하성, "텔레비전 시청만족도 형성에 관한 재고찰시청동기, 의사인간관계(para?social interaction),실재감(presence)의 상호작용을 중심으로" 한국방송학회 21 (21): 342-382, 2007

    8 이호준, "텔레비전 수용자의 프로그램 평가와 장르 인식" 한국방송학회 22 (22): 169-214, 2008

    9 조항제, "텔레비전 멜로드라마에서 나타나는 가족 표현의 변화<하늘이시여>와 <굿바이 솔로>를 중심으로" 한국방송학회 21 (21): 574-617, 2007

    10 김대호, "케이블 채널 사업의 시장성과에 관한 검토" 45 (45): 39-68, 2001

    11 심미선, "지상파방송의 편성특성에 관한 연구: 한국, 미국, 영국 일본, 대만을 중심으로" 한국방송학회 17 (17): 37-75, 2003

    12 이재신, "전문가와 네티즌 영화평의 온라인 구전 효과" 한국방송학회 23 (23): 449-484, 2009

    13 김봉준, "온라인에서의 제품 평가 정보가 소비자 구매의사결정에 미치는 영향에 대한 연구:제품 리뷰 기사와 소비자 댓글의 구전효과" 1-27, 2007

    14 김재휘, "온라인에서의 새로운 의견 선도자 탐색: 구전의 확산에 미치는 영향력을 통해서" 한국소비자학회 19 (19): 93-113, 2008

    15 이은영, "온라인 환경에서의 정보특성이 구전효과에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구 : 소비자 제품지식의 조절효과를 중심으로" 한국광고학회 16 (16): 145-171, 2005

    16 이종수, "미국드라마 수용의 즐거움과 온라인 팬덤: 한국의 <프리즌 브레이크> 팬카페 분석을 중심으로" 한국방송학회 22 (22): 213-254, 2008

    17 배진아, "드라마 시청률 영향 요인 분석드라마 속성 및 수용자 요인을 중심으로" 한국방송학회 19 (19): 270-309, 2005

    18 김경묵, "대 흥행(block-buster) 드라마의 조건: 드라마의 친숙성, 주연배우 지명도, 인터넷 기사(記事) 등이 시청률에 미치는 영향" 한국전략경영학회 12 (12): 25-54, 2009

    19 김은미, "다채널 텔레비전 시청자의 동질성에 관한 연구" 15 (15): 43-80, 2001

    20 Morahan-Martin, J., "Women and the internet:Promise and perils" 3 (3): 683-691, 2000

    21 Christopher, L., "Why ‘idol’ is golden" 25 (25): 1-22, 2006

    22 Anand, N., "When market information constitutes fields: Sensemaking of markets in the commercial music industry" 46 (46): 283-301, 2000

    23 Collins, A., "What makes a blockbuster? Economic analysis of film success in the United Kingdom" 23 : 343-354, 2002

    24 Brinja, M., "We don't need another hero: implications from network structure and resource commitment for movie performance" 60 : 74-98, 2008

    25 Johnson, R. D., "Wag the blog: How reliance on traditional media and the internet influence credibility perceptions of webblogs among blog users" 81 (81): 622-642, 2004

    26 Ward, S., "Virtually participating: A survey of online party members" 7 : 199-215, 2002

    27 Berenbaum, H., "Varieties of joy-related pleasurable activities and feelings" 16 (16): 473-494, 2002

    28 Godes, D., "Using online conversations to study word of mouth communication" 23 : 545-560, 2004

    29 De Vany, A., "Uncertainty in the movies: Can star power reduce the terror of the box office?" 23 : 285-318, 1999

    30 De Vany, A., "Uncertainty in the movie industry: Can star power reduce the terror of the box office?" 23 : 285-318, 1999

    31 Rindfleisch, A., "Transaction cost analysis: Past, present, and future applications" 61 (61): 30-54, 1997

    32 David-Blake, A., "The search for dispositional effects in organizational research" 14 : 385-400, 1989

    33 McCarty, J. A., "The role of personal values and demographics in predicting television viewing behavior:implications for theory and application" 22 (22): 77-101, 1993

    34 McCarty, J. A., "The role of personal values and demographics in predicting television viewing behavior:Implications for theory and application" 22 (22): 77-101, 1993

    35 Barsade, S. G., "The ripple effect: Emotional contagion and its influence on group behavior" 47 (47): 644-675, 2002

    36 Miller, D., "The resourcebased view of the firm in two environments:The hollywood film studios from 1936 to 1965" 39 (39): 519-543, 1996

    37 Swaminathan, A., "The proliferation of specialist organizations in the Amierican wine industry" 40 (40): 653-680, 1995

    38 Hannan, M. T., "The population ecology of organizations" 82 : 929-964, 1977

    39 Hannan, M. T., "The organizational niche" 21 : 309-340, 2003

    40 Earl, J., "The new site of activism: On-line organizations, movement entrepreneurs, and the changing location of social movement decision-making" 2 : 155-187, 2003

    41 Levinthal, D. A., "The myopia of learning" 14 : 95-112, 1993

    42 DiMaggio, P. M., "The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields" 47 : 147-160, 1983

    43 Lin, C. A., "The influence of network branding on audience affinity for network television" 1 : 19-32, 2002

    44 Reinstein, D. A., "The influence of expert reviews on consumer demand for experience goods: A case study of movie critics" 53 : 27-51, 2005

    45 Conlon, D. E., "The effects of physical, and social context on evaluations of captive, intensive service relationships" 47 (47): 433-445, 2004

    46 Pfeffer, J., "The effect of uncertainty of social influence in organizational decision making" 21 (21): 227-245, 1976

    47 Ladhari, R., "The effect of consumption emotions on satisfaction and word-of-mouth communications" 24 (24): 1085-1108, 2007

    48 Danneels, E., "The dynamics of product innovation and firm competences" 23 (23): 1095-1121, 2002

    49 Mintzberg, H., "The design school: Reconsidering the basic premises of strategic management" 11 (11): 171-195, 1990

    50 Zukerman, E. W., "The critical tradeoff: Identity assignment and box-office success in the feature-film industry" 12 : 12-67, 2003

    51 Wittebols, J. H., "The Soap Opera Paradigm:Television Programming and Corporate Priorities" Rowman & Littlefield Publishers 2004

    52 Sharp, B., "Television:Back to the future" 21 : 211-218, 2009

    53 Cohen, J., "Television viewing preferences:Programs, schedules, and the structure of viewing choices made by Israeli adults" 46 (46): 204-221, 2002

    54 Kreimer, S. F., "Technologies of protest:Insurgent social movements and the first amendment in the era of the internet" 150 : 119-171, 2002

    55 이화진, "TV드라마 시청률에 영향을 미치는 요인내용변인을 중심으로" 한국방송학회 21 (21): 492-535, 2007

    56 Ju-Pak, K., "TV ratings analysis:Sizing the efficiency of TV advertising & the role of program and advertising factors" 154-163, 2003

    57 Zukerman, E. W., "Structural incoherence and stock market activity" 69 : 405-432, 2004

    58 Prahalad, C. K., "Strategy as a field of study: Why search for a new paradigm?" 15 : 5-16, 1994

    59 Hitt, M., "Strategic decision models: integrating different perspectives" 12 (12): 327-351, 1991

    60 Adler, M., "Stardom and talent" 75 : 208-212, 1985

    61 Sorenson, O., "Social structure and exchange: Self-confirming dynamics in Hollywood" 51 (51): 560-589, 2006

    62 Dawn, R., "Soaps by numbers: When networks look ratings, it's not how many people are watching that's important-it's who's watching" 24 (24): 36-39, 1999

    63 Riegel, H., "Soap operas and gossip" 29 (29): 201-209, 1996

    64 Harrington, C. L., "Soap fans: Pursuing pleasure and making meaning in everyday life" Temple University Press 1995

    65 Matelski, J. M., "Soap Opera Worldwide:Cultural and Serial Reality" McFarland 1999

    66 Potts, R., "Sensation seeking, television viewing motives, and home television viewing patterns" 21 (21): 1081-1084, 1996

    67 Walsh, J., "Selectivity and selective perception: An investigation of managers' belief structures and information processing" 4 : 873-896, 1988

    68 Dearborn, D. C., "Selective perception: A note on the departmental identification of executives" 14 : 140-144, 1958

    69 Sitkin, S. B., "Reconceptualizing the determinants of risk behavior" 17 (17): 9-38, 1992

    70 Webster, J. G., "Rating Analysis: Theory and Practice" Lawrence Erlbaum 1991

    71 Litman, B. R., "Predicting success of motion pictures: The 80's experience" 2 (2): 35-50, 1983

    72 Furnham, A., "Personality traits, emotional intelligence, and multiple happiness" 9 (9): 439-462, 2007

    73 Robins, J. A., "Organization as strategy:Restructuring production in the film industry" 14 : 103-118, 1993

    74 Danaher, P. J., "Optimizing television program schedules using choice modeling" 38 : 298-312, 2001

    75 Shankar, V., "Online trust: a stakeholder perspective, concepts, implications, and future directions" 11 (11): 325-344, 2002

    76 Chatterjee, P., "Online reviews: Do consumers use them?" 28 : 129-133, 2001

    77 Smith, D., "Online peer and editorial recommendations ‘trust’ and choice in virtual markets" 19 (19): 15-37, 2005

    78 Reeve, D. K., "On the specificity of expert knowledge about a soap opera: An everyday story of farming folk" 12 : 35-42, 1998

    79 Holzhausen, K. G., "Normative and Informational Influences in Conformity, Persuation:A Unified Paradigm of Social Influence" Texas Tech University 1993

    80 Scodari, C., "No politics here”: Age and gender in soap opera “cyberfandom" 21 (21): 168-187, 1998

    81 Freeman, J., "Niche width and the dynamics of organizational populations" 88 : 1116-1145, 1983

    82 Meyer, D., "New measures and a new model for television network loyalty (MOTNL)" 19 (19): 1-19, 2008

    83 Aiken, L. S., "Multiple Regression:Testing and Interpreting Interactions" Sage Publications 1991

    84 De Vany, A., "Motion picture, profit, the stable Paretian hypothesis, and the curse of the superstar" 28 : 1035-1057, 2004

    85 Tavakoli, M., "Modelling television viewing patterns" 25 (25): 72-86, 1996

    86 Hills, M., "Michael Jackson fans on trial? 'Documenting' emotivism and fandom in wacho about Jacko" 17 (17): 459-476, 2007

    87 Dwyer, P., "Measuring the value of electronic word of mouth and its impact in consumer communities" 21 (21): 63-79, 2007

    88 Podolny, J. M., "Market uncertainty and the social character of economic exchange" 39 : 458-483, 1994

    89 Lavie, N., "Load to theory of selective attention and cognitive control" 133 (133): 339-354, 2004

    90 Brockner, J., "Layoffs, job insecurity, and survivors' work effort: Evidence of an inverted-U relationship" 35 : 526-541, 1992

    91 Hsu, G., "Jacks of all trades and masters of none: Audiences' reactions to spanning genres in feature film production" 51 (51): 420-450, 2006

    92 Hawawini, G., "Is performance driven by industriof firm-specific factors? A new look at the evidence" 24 (24): 1-16, 2003

    93 Frank, R. E., "Internetbased segments of TV audiences" 5 : 55-64, 2000

    94 Desai, K. K., "Interactive influence of genre familiarity, star power, and critics' reviews in the cultural goods industry: The case of motion pictures" 22 (22): 203-223, 2005

    95 Tolbert, P. S., "Institutional sources of change in the formal structure of organizations: The diffusion of civil service reform, 1880-1935" 28 (28): 22-39, 1983

    96 Schwenk, C. R., "Information, cognitive biases, and commitment to a course of action" 11 : 298-310, 1986

    97 Ravid, S. A., "Information, blockbusters, and stars: A study of the film industry" 72 : 463-492, 1999

    98 Hult, G. T., "Information processing, knowledge development, and strategic supply chain performance" 47 (47): 241-253, 2004

    99 Johnson, T. J., "In blog we trust? Deciphering credibility of components of the internet among politically interested internet users" 25 : 175-182, 2009

    100 Zillmann, D., "Humor and comedy. in: Media Entertainment: The Psychology of Its Appeal" Lawrence Erlbaum 37-57, 2000

    101 McGahan, A. M., "How much does industry matter, really?" 18 : 15-30, 1997

    102 Basuroy, S., "How critical are critical reviews? The box office effects of film critics, star-power and budgets" 67 : 103-117, 2003

    103 Waller, M. J., "Functional background as a determinant of executives' selective perception" 94 : 943-974, 1995

    104 Liladhar, J., "From the soap queen to the Aga-Saga: Different discursive frameworks of familial feminity in contemporary 'women's genres" 9 (9): 5-12, 2000

    105 Eliahsberg, J., "Film critics: Influencers or predictors?" 61 : 68-78, 1997

    106 Asai, S., "Factors affecting hits in Japanese popular music" 21 : 97-113, 2008

    107 Dellarocas, C., "Exploring the value of online product re views: The case of motion picture" 21 (21): 23-45, 2007

    108 Ahuja, G., "Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: A longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions" 22 (22): 521-543, 2001

    109 Scheonewolf, G., "Emotional contagion: Behavior induction in individuals and groups" 15 : 49-61, 1990

    110 Fisher, S. R., "Downsizing in a learning organization: Are there hidden cost?" 25 (25): 244-251, 2000

    111 Klepper, S., "Dominance by birthright: Entry of prior radio producers and competitive ramifications in the U.S. television receiver industry" 21 (21): 997-1016, 2000

    112 Schmalensee, R., "Do markets differ much?" 75 (75): 341-351, 1985

    113 Bennett, T., "Distinction on the box: Cultural capital and the social space of broadcasting" 15 (15): 193-212, 2006

    114 Berndt, T. J., "Developmental changes in conformity to peers and parents" 15 (15): 608-616, 1979

    115 Bury, R., "Cyberspaces of Their Own: Female Fandoms Online" Peter Lang Publishing 2005

    116 McCaughey, M., "Cyberactivism:Online activism in theory and practice" Routledge 2003

    117 Bond, R., "Culture and conformity: A meta-analysis of studies using Asch's(1952b, 1956) line judgement task" 119 (119): 111-137, 1996

    118 Hirsch, P. M., "Cultural industries revisited" 11 (11): 356-361, 2000

    119 Lee, F. L., "Cultural discount and crossculture predictability: Examining the box office performance of American movies in Hong Kong" 19 (19): 259-278, 2006

    120 Dalakas, V., "Consumer satisfaction with insight for the entertainment industries" 29 (29): 47-59, 2007

    121 Zureik, E., "Consumer power in the digital society" 48 (48): 46-51, 2005

    122 Kucuk, S. U., "Consumer exit, voice, and ‘power’ on the internet" 15 : 1-13, 2008

    123 Podsakoff, P. M., "Common method bias in behavior research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies" 88 : 879-903, 2003

    124 Schwenk, C. R., "Cognitive simplification processes in strategic decision-making" 5 (5): 111-128, 1984

    125 Murray, S., "Celebrating the story the way it is: Cultural studies, corporate media and the contested utility of fandom" 18 (18): 7-25, 2004

    126 McWilliam, G., "Building stronger brands through online communities" 5 : 43-54, 2000

    127 De Vany, A., "Bose-Einstein dynamics and adaptive contracting in the motion picture industry" 106 : 1493-1514, 1996

    128 Mark, N., "Birds of a feather sing together" 77 : 453-485, 1998

    129 Norton, M. I., "Bias in jury selection: justifying prohibited peremptory challenges" 20 : 467-479, 2007

    130 Lee, K. J., "Bayesian belief network for box-office performance:A case study on Korean movies" Expert Systems with Applications 2007

    131 Lampel, J., "Balancing act: Learning from organizing practices in cultural industries" 11 (11): 263-269, 2000

    132 Rubin, A., "Audience activity and soap opera involvement: A uses and effects investigation" 14 : 246-268, 1987

    133 Rubin, A., "Audience activity and media use" 60 : 98-105, 1993

    134 Vermigli, P., "Attachment and field dependence: individual differences in information processing" 9 (9): 43-55, 2004

    135 Elsbach, K. D., "Assessing creativity in Hollywood pitch meetings:Evidence for a dual-process model of creativity judgement" 46 (46): 283-301, 2003

    136 Swann, P., "An econometric analysis of television viewing and the welfare economics of introducing an additional channel in the UK" 6 : 25-51, 1994

    137 Rust, R. T., "An audience flow model of television viewing choice" 3 (3): 113-124, 1984

    138 Donaldson, L., "American Anti-Management Theories of Organization: A Critique of Paradigm Proliferation" Cambridge University Press 1995

    139 Scardaville, M. C., "Accidental activists:Fan activism in the soap opera community" 48 (48): 881-901, 2005

    140 Pfeffer, J., "A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design" 23 : 224-253, 1978

    141 Schesser, S. D., "A new domain of public speech: Opening public spaces online" 94 : 1791-1825, 2006

    142 Shaw, J. B., "A cognitive categorization model for the study of intercultural management" 15 (15): 626-645, 1990

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2022 평가 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
    2017-01-01 등재 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2001-07-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1999-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.45 1.45 1.48
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.64 1.69 2.793 0.2
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼