RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    회계학 전공 학생과 회계 업무 담당자간 성격유형의 상관관계에 관한 연구 = An Empirical Study on the Personality Correlation between Accounting-Major Students and Accounting-engaged Employees

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A77008975

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Prior to study the organization, we should be study on the organization` prospects from the scene of the school cases. I propose that students can be one of the members of the organization. Based on `The Big Five` personality model, this study develops hypothetical causal relationships of potential organization member`s personality and major of students. Research hypotheses are empirically tested with data collected from 151students and 153 employees. Results show that accounting major student`s personality and employees personality significantly influence in Agreeableness and Emotional stability personality. But accounting major student`s personality and employees personality non-significantly influence in Extraversion, Conscientiousness and Openness personality.
    번역하기

    Prior to study the organization, we should be study on the organization` prospects from the scene of the school cases. I propose that students can be one of the members of the organization. Based on `The Big Five` personality model, this study develop...

    Prior to study the organization, we should be study on the organization` prospects from the scene of the school cases. I propose that students can be one of the members of the organization. Based on `The Big Five` personality model, this study develops hypothetical causal relationships of potential organization member`s personality and major of students. Research hypotheses are empirically tested with data collected from 151students and 153 employees. Results show that accounting major student`s personality and employees personality significantly influence in Agreeableness and Emotional stability personality. But accounting major student`s personality and employees personality non-significantly influence in Extraversion, Conscientiousness and Openness personality.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 유태용, "성격의 5요인과 학업수행간의 관계" 28 : 197-214, 1999

    2 유태용, "다양한 직군에서의 성격 5요인과 직무수행간의 관계" 5 : 69-94, 1997

    3 Evans, G. E, "What best predicts computer proficiency?" 32 (32): 1322-1327, 1989

    4 Davis, F. D, "User perceptions of decision support effectiveness: Two production planning experiments" 25 : 57-78, 1994

    5 Laribee, S, "The psychological types of college accounting students" 28 : 37-42, 1994

    6 Remus, W. E, "The impact of cognitive style and learning on structured decision making" 46 : 6-12, 1998

    7 Hester, C, "The effects of personality style configurations and logical reasoning scores on academic achievement in computer science" 18 : 43-49, 1989

    8 Cheng, M. M, "The effects of coginiyive style diversity on decision-making dyads: An empirical analysis in the context of a complex task" 15 : 39-62, 2003

    9 Chenhall, R, "The effect of cognitive style and Sponsorship bias on the treatment of opportunity costs in resource allocation decisions" 16 : 27-46, 1991

    10 Bishop-Clark, C, "The Myers_Briggs Type Indicator and its relationship to computer programming" 26 (26): 358-370, 1994

    1 유태용, "성격의 5요인과 학업수행간의 관계" 28 : 197-214, 1999

    2 유태용, "다양한 직군에서의 성격 5요인과 직무수행간의 관계" 5 : 69-94, 1997

    3 Evans, G. E, "What best predicts computer proficiency?" 32 (32): 1322-1327, 1989

    4 Davis, F. D, "User perceptions of decision support effectiveness: Two production planning experiments" 25 : 57-78, 1994

    5 Laribee, S, "The psychological types of college accounting students" 28 : 37-42, 1994

    6 Remus, W. E, "The impact of cognitive style and learning on structured decision making" 46 : 6-12, 1998

    7 Hester, C, "The effects of personality style configurations and logical reasoning scores on academic achievement in computer science" 18 : 43-49, 1989

    8 Cheng, M. M, "The effects of coginiyive style diversity on decision-making dyads: An empirical analysis in the context of a complex task" 15 : 39-62, 2003

    9 Chenhall, R, "The effect of cognitive style and Sponsorship bias on the treatment of opportunity costs in resource allocation decisions" 16 : 27-46, 1991

    10 Bishop-Clark, C, "The Myers_Briggs Type Indicator and its relationship to computer programming" 26 (26): 358-370, 1994

    11 Carey, J. C, "The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator as a measure of aspects of coginitive style" 22 : 94-99, 1989

    12 Wheeler, P. R, "The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator and applications to accounting education and research" 16 : 125-150, 2001

    13 Fodor, J, "The Mind Doesn’t Work That Way: The Scope and Limits of Computational Psychology" Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press 2000

    14 Johnson-Laird,P.N, "The Computer and the Mind: An Introduction to Cognitive Science" Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press 1988

    15 Harvey, R. J, "Reliability and Validity. In MBTI Applications: A Decade of Research on the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator" CA: Consulting Psychologists Pres 1996

    16 Jung, C. G, "Psychological Types" NJ: Princeton University Press 1921

    17 Huitt, W. G, "Problem solving and decision making: Consideration of individual difference using the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator" 24 : 33-44, 1992

    18 Pervin, L. A, "Personality: Theory & Research" New York: John Wiley & Sons 1996

    19 Campbell, D. E, "Personality type and mode of information presentation: Preference, accuracy, and efficiency in problem solving" 20 : 47-51, 1991

    20 Holsworth, T. F, "Perceptual style correlates for the MBTI" 10 : 32-35, 1985

    21 Allport, G. W, "Patten and growth in personality" New York: Holt. Rinehart and Winston 1961

    22 Myers, I. B, "MBTIㅡManual: A Guide to the Development and Use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator" CA: Consulting Psychologists Press 1988

    23 Rosenak, C. M, "Jungian Q-Sorts: Demonstrating construct validity for Psychological type and the MBTI" 15 : 33-45, 1988

    24 Pascal, E, "Jung to Live By" New York, NY: Warner Books, Inc 1992

    25 Pinker,S, "How the Mind Works" New York, NY: W. W. Norton and Company 1997

    26 Daigle, R, "Group zig zag: an Extension of Myers’ zig zag" 48 : 34-41, 1999

    27 Ruble T. L, "Effects of coginitive style and decision setting on performance" 46 : 283-295, 1990

    28 Kerin, R. A, "Decision making and acquisition of information: Further explorations of the Myers-Briggs Indicator" 132-134, 1981

    29 Jones, W. P, "Computer use and Coginitive style" 26 (26): 514-522, 1994

    30 Landry, R. M., Jr, "Computer usage and psychological type characteristics in accounting students"

    31 Newell, A, "Computer science a empirical inquiry: Symbol and search" 19 (19): 113-126, 1976

    32 Huber, G. P, "Cognitive style as a basis for MIS and DSS designs: Much about nothing?" 29 : 567-579, 1983

    33 Hunt R., F, "Cognitive style and decision making" 44 : 436-453, 1989

    34 Robey, D, "Cognitive style and DSS design: A comment on Huber’s paper" 29 : 580-582, 1983

    35 Ott, R. L, "An empirical investigation into the interactive effects of student personality traits and method of instruction(lecture or CAI) on student performance in elementary accounting" 8 : 17-35, 1990

    36 Hergenhahn, B. R, "An Introduction to Theories of Personality" NJ: Prentice Hall, Inc 1999

    37 Meier, C. A, "An Empirical study of Jungian typology" 23 : 3-15, 1978

    38 Patrick R. Wheeler, "Accounting Information Systems Research Opportunities Using Personality Type Theory and the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator" 18 (18): 1-19, 2004

    39 Gosling, S. D, "A Very Brief Measure of the Big Five Personality Domains" 37 : 504-528, 2003

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2009-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2008-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2006-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.69 1.69 1.56
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.58 1.4 1.815 0.5
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼