Comparative development studies : in search of the world view

목차 (Table of Contents)

• CONTENTS
• List of Tables and Figures = xii
• Preface and Acknowledgements = xiv
• Foreword by John Hilman = xv
• Introduction = 1
• 1 The Concept of the World View in Comparative Politico-Economic Perspective = 5
• 1.1 Comparative development study as a scientific enquiry = 5
• 1.2 Definition and explanation of initial conceptions = 8
• 1.3 The traditional perceptions in economic theory = 14
• 1.4 Toward the concept of the world view in economic theory = 17
• 1.5 Comparative development study and economic theory = 18
• 1.6 Examining pluralism in major world development issues = 19
• 1.7 A critical examination of the Stockholm development proposals in the light of the world-view treatment of those problems = 25
• 1.8 The world view of comparative development study = 30
• 1.9 Euro-centric development in mainstream economics = 30
• 1.10 Establishing comparative development as a scientific study = 31
• 1.11 What is comparative development study? = 33
• 1.12 Elementary formalization of the ethico-economic approach to development theorizing = 34
• 1.13 Ethical endogeneity as the centrepiece of the world view in comparative development study = 37
• 1.14 The world view defined in terms of the principle of ethical endogeneity = 39
• 1.15 Resource allocation in ethico-economics = 40
• 1.16 Conclusion = 44
• 2 A Critical Examination of Development Paradigms = 45
• 2.1 The concept of socio-economic development explained and critically discussed = 45
• 2.2 Treatment of population growth and control in the light of different theories of development = 46
• 2.3 Poverty and inequality models in development studies = 49
• 2.4 A summary of development paradigms = 57
• 2.5 Lemons to be learned in development experience from the competing theories = 57
• 2.6 Ethics-centred development: Schumacher, Goulet and the steady-state school = 59
• 2.7 A critical examination of the mainstream ethical theories in development = 63
• 2.8 The treatment of population in the light of the ethico-economic approach to development studies = 65
• 2.9 Rethinking development paradigms and strategies = 67
• 2.10 Conclusion: a look at poverty-centred and sustainable development from comparative development perspectives = 72
• 2.11 Formalization of the sustainable development theory = 75
• 2.12 Lessons from formalization of sustainable development = 77
• 2.13 Sustainable development in the perspective of ethical endogeneity = 78
• 2.14 Formalizing sustainable development in ethico-economic theory = 81
• 2.15 A comparative examination of ethico-economic formalization in development study = 84
• 2.16 Critically examining NIEO in the light of the ethico-economic development approach: proposing the ethico-economic alternative = 86
• 2.17 The financial aspects of promoting grassroots development in the ethico-economic framework = 88
• 2.18 Conclusion: a comparative examination. of the schema of underdevelopment = 91
• 3 The Political Economy of Development = 93
• 3.1 The idea of political economy from the mainstream and ethico-economic viewpoints = 93
• 3.2 The influence of politico-economic thought on development studies: a review of some contemporary thinking = 94
• 3.3 Summary: does the study of political economy have a scientific core? = 99
• 3.4 Social decision-making as perceived in mainstream and ethico-economic studies in the political economy of development = 100
• 3.5 Hollis Chenery's structural. transformation concept = 101
• 3.6 The importance of technological change in structural transformation = 103
• 3.7 The political economy of development and the idea of structural transformation with technological change: the influence of public choice theory = 105
• 3.8 The idea of social goods contrasted with the idea of public goods in development study = 106
• 3.9 Decision-making with public and with social goods = 109
• 3.10 Marxist political economy as a non-functionalist body of thought = 112
• 3.11 World-systems theory in the political economy of development = 113
• 3.12 An ethico-economic general equilibrium approach versus world-systems theory in the political economy of development = 114
• 3.13 Studying sustainable development and the poverty problem with an ethico-economic approach to political economy = 115
• 3.14 The role of sectoral interlinkages in the ethico-economic approach to development = 118
• 3.15 The concept of structural transformation in the ethico-economic approach to development = 121
• 3.16 The political economy of population in development study = 122
• 3.17 Population theory and demographic change = 123
• 3.18 The political economy of demographic. change = 126
• 3.19 The neo-classical approach to an endogenous theory of population in economic analysis = 130
• 3.20 Summary: classical and neo-classical approaches to population theory in economic analysis = 133
• 3.21 The Marxist treatment of population in political economy = 133
• 3.22 The essence of population endogeneity in economic theory = 134
• 3.23 The principle of ethical endogeneity applied to the political economy of demographic change = 134
• 3.24 A brief formalization of the principle of ethical endogeneity = 136
• 3.25 Conclusion = 137
• 4 Some Major Conceptual Issues in Development = 139
• 4.1 Population relations in the light of structural transformation = 139
• 4.2 The issue of simultaneity between distributive equity and economic efficiency = 143
• 4.3 Extending efficency-equity simultaneity to international economic relations = 144
• 4.4 The concept of moral rationality in development = 146
• 4.5 Distributive equity and moral rationality = 147
• 4.6 Concepts of economic justice in the literature = 150
• 4.7 The basic needs regime of development = 151
• 4.8 A critical look at the basic needs approach to development = 153
• 4.9 Failure of mainstream to establish a basic needs regime = 156
• 4.10 Concepts of poverty, equality, entitlement, and justice = 156
• 4.11 Development organizations influenced by prevailing concepts of equality, entitlement, and justice in addressing the global poverty problem = 177
• 4.12 Relevance of the Marxist approach to sustainable development = 180
• 4.13 Intragenerational and intergenerational concepts of equality/inequality = 181
• 4.14 Ethical endogeneity and moral rationality in investment-centred structural transformation = 184
• 4.15 The concept of moral entitlement = 188
• 4.16 Conclusion = 189
• 5 A Critical Examination of Some World Development Reports = 191
• 5.1 The South Commission Report: The Challenge to the South = 191
• 5.2 A critical examination of the proposals made by the South Commission Report = 200
• 5.3 Summary of South Commission recommendations for the South = 214
• 5.4 Problems and prospects of development in the South in the perspective of Global Economic Outlook 2000 = 214
• 5.5 World Development Report 1989, 1990, 1991: World Bank outlook on the state of the global economy = 215
• 5.6 Critical review of Global Economic Outlook 2000 = 228
• 5.7 UNDP: Human Development Report 1990, 1991 = 236
• 5.8 Common themes amongst the Reports = 242
• 5.9 The ethico-economic alternative to UNDP-UN perspectives = 248
• 5.10 Significant microeconomic interrelationships in ethical structuring in South development = 249
• 5.11 Population as the focus of issues in equality, poverty, entitlement, and justice in the framework of development = 253
• 5.12 Conclusion = 256
• 6 Conclusion = 260
• 6.1 Anomie in development theorizing = 260
• 6.2 The central issue of simultaneity between distributive equity and economic efficiency in development perspective: the ethico-economic world view = 261
• 6.3 Loss of uniqueness of objective and perceptions in mainstream development theories = 262
• 6.4 Mainstream economic features of alternative ethical approaches to development = 263
• 6.5 Ethics-centred development emphasized in development reports = 264
• 6.6 The ultimate need for a scientific and methodological study of ethics in development = 265
• Technical Appendix: A Mathematical Formulation on the Knowledge-based World View Model of Development = 267
• Notes and References = 271
• Index = 288