『四聲通解』의 魚語御韻과 模姥暮韻에 인용된 『蒙古韻略』과 『蒙古字韻』의 비교 연구 = The Residual Texts of Ménggǔ Zìyùn as Cited in Sa-Seng-Tong-Hai under theMC Rhymes of Yú (魚), Yǔ (語), Yù (御) andMú (模) Mǔ (姥)Mù (暮)

국문 초록 (Abstract)

本文對崔世珍在≪四聲通解≫魚語御韻和模姥暮韻標註≪蒙古韻略≫何音的字與≪蒙古字韻≫做的比較分析結果如下：
1) 除了「遽」等字的訓民正音轉寫「:뀨」應改為「·뀨」、「貯」等字的訓民正音轉寫「쥬」應改為「:쥬」、「戍」等字的訓民正音轉寫「슈」應改為「·슈」外, ≪四聲通解≫魚語御韻和模姥暮韻所引≪蒙古韻略≫小韻字讀音與≪蒙古字韻≫完全一致。但≪蒙古韻略≫和≪蒙古字韻≫在收錄字上存在不同。
2) 漢語[-əw]音的≪蒙古字韻≫八思巴字轉寫為/-uw/, ≪蒙古韻略≫的訓民正音轉寫為/-əw/。八思巴字轉寫/-uw/與漢語拼音的/-ou/類似, 訓民正音的轉寫與IPA標記一致。
3) 「醵」在≪蒙古字韻≫裡有平聲 [giu]和入聲 [giεw]二音, 但在≪蒙古韻略≫裡還有去聲[giu]一音；「柱」在≪蒙古字韻≫裡有上聲 [dʒiu]一音, 在≪蒙古韻略≫裡還有上聲 [t∫iu]和去聲 [giu]二音；「紵」在≪蒙古字韻≫裡有上聲 [dʒiu]一音, 在≪蒙古韻略≫裡還有上聲 [t∫iu]一音。「輸」在≪蒙古字韻≫裡有平聲 [∫iu]一音, 在≪蒙古韻略≫裡還有去聲 [∫iu]一音。
4) ≪四聲通解≫的收錄字以≪洪武正韻≫為基準, 在≪洪武正韻≫、≪蒙古韻略≫均收錄並且在二書中的讀音一致的收錄在先, 不標註≪蒙古韻略≫何音；二書讀音不一致的漢字收錄在其後, 并標註≪蒙古韻略≫何音。崔世珍在≪四聲通解≫裡添加了≪洪武正韻≫未收錄的「續添字」, 一些「續添字」也見於≪蒙古字韻≫, 本文推測, 這樣的「續添字」可能也收錄在≪蒙古韻略≫。
5) ≪蒙古字韻≫和≪蒙古韻略≫有魚母一聲紐, 八思巴字轉寫為/’-/, 有別于喩母的/j-/, 但是崔世珍的轉寫均為/ㅇ/, 所以二母的實際音值均為零聲母[ø-]。
6) ≪蒙古字韻≫魚韻(≪蒙古韻略≫魚語御韻) 有[-u]、[-iu]兩個韻母, 但是[-iu]中的[i]受其後圓唇母音u的影響, 實際音值為接近圓唇[y]的一個音, 所以八思巴字轉寫為/ė/, 訓民正音裡無這樣的元音, 並且帶有圓唇性質的[i]與純粹的[i]在音位上不構成對立, 所以訓民正音轉寫為[i]。通過≪蒙古字韻≫魚韻(≪蒙古韻略≫魚語御韻) 的八思巴字和訓民正音的轉寫, 證明漢語的[y]韻母在≪蒙古字韻≫(≪蒙古韻略≫) 成書的時代還未產生。
7) 崔世珍在≪四聲通解≫魚語御韻和模姥暮韻引用的包括「迂」在內的≪古今韻會≫的記錄均與≪古今韻會擧要≫一致。花登正宏(1997:71) 主張從崔世珍的注釋可以證明崔世珍所見「韻會」為≪古今韻會≫, 而非≪古今韻會擧要≫, 這一主張是錯誤的。

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Choi Se-Jin makes a comparative analysis of the pronunciation of some words marked “Meng-Gu-Yun-Lüe” in “Sa-Seong-tong-Hae” Yú (魚), Yǔ (語), Yù (御) and Mú (模) Mǔ (姥) Mù (暮) Rhyme. This paper makes a comparative analysis of these words and “Meng-Gu-Zi-Yun”, and the results are as follows:
1) The Chinese [-əu] sound is translated into /-uw/ in the Phags-pa character of “Meng-Gu-Zi-Yun”. The Hunminjeongeum of “Meng-Gu-Yun-Lüe” is translated into /--əw /. The transliteration of the Phags-pa character /-uw/ is similar to the /-ou/ of Hanyu Pinyin, and the transliteration of the Hunminjeongeum is consistent with the IPA mark.
2) “醵” has 平聲 [giu] and 入聲 [giεw] in “Meng-Gu-Zi-Yun”, but there is 平聲 [giu] and 入聲 [giεw] and 去聲 [giu] in “Meng-Gu-Yun-Lüe” ; “柱” has 上聲 [dʒiu] in “Meng-Gu-Zi-Yun”，but there is 上聲 [dʒiu] and 上聲 [t∫iu] and 去聲 [giu] in “Meng-Gu-Yun-Lüe” ; “紵” has 上聲 [dʒiu] in “Meng-Gu-Zi-Yun”, but there is 上聲 [dʒiu] and 上聲 [t∫iu] in “Meng-Gu-Yun-Lüe” ; “輸” has 平聲 [∫iu] in “Meng-Gu-Zi-Yun”, but there is 平聲 [∫iu] and 去聲 [∫iu] in “Meng-Gu-Yun-Lüe” ;
3) The included words of “Sa-Seong-tong-Hae” are based on “Hongwu Zhengyun”. The words with the same pronunciation in Hongwu Zhengyun and “Meng-Gu-Yun-Lüe” are included first, and The words with inconsistent pronunciation in the two books are included later, and marked with he Yin of “Mongolian Rhyme”. Choi Se-Jin added “續添字” which is not included in “Hongwu Zhengyun” in “Sa-Seong-tong-Hae”, some of which can also be found in “Meng-Gu-Zi-Yun”. This paper speculates that such “續添字” may also be included in “Meng-Gu-Yun-Lüe”.
4) “Meng-Gu-Yun-Lüe” and “Meng-Gu-Zi-Yun” have 魚母, and the Basiba character is /’- /, which is different from the 喩母’s / j- /, but Choi Se-Jin’s transliteration is /ㅇ/, So the actual sound values of the two initials are both zero consonants [ø-].
5) The “Meng-Gu-Zi-Yun” Rhymes of Yú (魚) (“Meng-Gu-Yun-Lüe” Rhymes of Yú (魚), Yǔ (語), Yù (御)) has two vowels [-u] and [-iu], but the [i] in [-iu] is affected by the subsequent lip vowel u, and the actual sound value is close to that of the lips [y], so the Phags-pa character is pronounced as /ė/, Hunminjeongeum does not have such a vowel, And there is no phoneme opposition between the lip-sensitive [i] and the essential [i], so the Hunminjeongeum is called [i]. Through the transliteration of the Phags-pa and Hunminjeongeum of the “Meng-Gu-Zi-Yun” Rhymes of Yú (魚) (“Meng-Gu-Yun-Lüe” Rhymes of Yú (魚), Yǔ (語), Yù (御)), Prove that [y] vowels were not generated at the time of “Meng-Gu-Zi-Yun” (“Meng-Gu-Yun-Lüe”)’s writing.
6) Cui Shizhen’s records of “Gu Jin Yun Hui”, including “迂”, are consistent with the “Gu Jin Yun Hui Ju Yao”. Masahiro Hanato (1997:71) argued that it can be clarified from Cui Shizhen’s notes that the “rhyming meeting” seen by Cui Shizhen is “ancient and modern rhyming meeting” rather than “ancient and modern rhyming meeting”, which is wrong.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 兪昌均, "較定蒙古韻略" 成文出版社 1973

2 俞昌均, "蒙古韻略과 四聲通攷의 研究" 瑩雪出版社 1974

3 照那斯圖, "蒙古字韻校本" 民族出版社 1987

4 鄭光, "蒙古字韻" 韓國學中央硏究院 2008

5 寧忌浮, "漢語韻書史金元卷" 上海人民出版社 2009

6 寧忌浮, "漢語韻書史明代卷" 上海人民出版社 2016

7 董同龢, "漢語音韻學" 文史哲出版社 1996

8 金武林, "洪武正韻譯訓硏究" 月印 1999

9 申叔舟, "洪武正韻譯訓" 高麗大學出版社影印本 1973

10 樂韶鳳, "洪武正韻" 亞細亞文化社 1973

11 王文郁, "新刊韻略" 臺灣國家圖書館藏本 1229

12 곡효운, "撮口呼形成小攷" 한국중국언어학회 (50) : 1-22, 2014

13 姜信沆, "四聲通解研究" 新雅社 1973

14 崔世珍, "四聲通解" 大提閣影印本 1973

15 崔世珍, "四聲通解" 日本國會圖書館藏本 1517

16 寧忌浮, "古今韻會舉要及相關韻書" 中華書局 1997

17 黃公紹, "古今韻會舉要" 中華書局 2000

18 花登正宏, "古今韻会挙要研究- 中国近世音韻史研究の一側面" 汲古書院 1997

19 A. A. Dragunov, "八思巴字與古漢語" 科學出版社 1959

20 羅常培, "八思巴字與元代漢語" 科學出版社 1959

21 羅常培, "八思巴字與元代漢語" 中國社會科學出版社 2004

22 楊耐思, "中原音韻音系" 中國社會科學出版社 1981

23 이경희, "『蒙古字韻』의 入聲韻尾 消失에 관한 考察" 중국어문학연구회 (45) : 89-106, 2007

24 최영애, "『蒙古字韻』과 그 음운특징 -15,6세기의 한국자료를 통하여" 중국어문학연구회 24 : 89-116, 2003

25 홍현지, "『蒙古字韻』과 『飜譯老乞大·朴通事』의 入聲韻 고찰" 한국중국언어학회 (82) : 29-53, 2019

26 곡효운, "『四聲通解』에 인용된 『蒙古韻略』과 『蒙古字韻』의 비교연구 — 齊薺霽韻을 중심으로" 한국중국언어학회 (91) : 1-50, 2020

27 곡효운, "《四聲通解》「東董送屋」韻所引《蒙古韻略》考" 한국중국언어학회 (68) : 1-24, 2017

28 곡효운, "≪四聲通解≫支紙寘韻所引≪蒙古韻略≫考" 한국중국언어학회 (74) : 1-26, 2018

29 "https://chardb.iis.sinica.edu.tw/"

30 樂韶鳳, "(國家圖書館藏明)洪武正韻" 中華書局 2016