RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      동사이동과 do-support = Verb Movement and do-support

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A2043112

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      In this paper I describe the change of Verb Movement in English and the diachronic development of Modern English(MnE) periphrastic do. In Old and Middle English, the main verb raised to INFL or C, but English lost its overt V-raising ability in Early Modern English (EMnE).The scope of Verb Movement is determined by morphological properties of INFL. Weak INFL cannot attract a heavy element such as a main verb, though it can attract a light element such as an auxiliary, while strong INFL attracts any element. INFL is argued to be strong only if there are plural markings overt and different from singular ones.
      The loss of V-raising resulted from the changes of morphological features. INFL in OE is rich enough morphologically to attract a heavy element such as main verb. Strong features of OE INFL remained unchanged in Middle English (ME). In ME the system of verb morphology was affected by the same changes that affected uoun morphology. However, the distinction between singular and plural was retained in ME, although there was a good deal of leveling in the verb paradigms.
      Therefore, the inflectional system in ME was still rich enough morphologically to attract a "heavy" element.
      Early in the 16th century, the plural marking disappeared in English verb morphology and INFL became weak. Consequently, V-raising disappeared gradually in the EMnE period. We have argued that the development of do as an auxiliary is closely related to the less of v-raising. After the loss of v-raising, optional do developed as MnE auxiliary do for negatives, emphatics, and questions.
      In case there is no auxiliary verb, do is inserted under T to support the feature[+Neg]. It is argued that there is no NegP in English. Inserted of NegP, the feature [+Neg] is assumed under T. The emphatic do is also introduced in the EMnE after the loss of v-raising. When the verb cannot move to T, do must be EMnE to support the emphatic feature.
      The [+Q] feature of T must move to C in questions, but it cannot move without being supported by an overt element. A carrier is needed for a feature to move. Our basic assumption is that no feature can move alone without being supported by an overt element. In case there is no modal or aspectual auxiliary, do must be inserted under T as the "last resort" in order to support a feature of T, e.g.[+Neg],or[+Emp]

      번역하기

      In this paper I describe the change of Verb Movement in English and the diachronic development of Modern English(MnE) periphrastic do. In Old and Middle English, the main verb raised to INFL or C, but English lost its overt V-raising ability in Early ...

      In this paper I describe the change of Verb Movement in English and the diachronic development of Modern English(MnE) periphrastic do. In Old and Middle English, the main verb raised to INFL or C, but English lost its overt V-raising ability in Early Modern English (EMnE).The scope of Verb Movement is determined by morphological properties of INFL. Weak INFL cannot attract a heavy element such as a main verb, though it can attract a light element such as an auxiliary, while strong INFL attracts any element. INFL is argued to be strong only if there are plural markings overt and different from singular ones.
      The loss of V-raising resulted from the changes of morphological features. INFL in OE is rich enough morphologically to attract a heavy element such as main verb. Strong features of OE INFL remained unchanged in Middle English (ME). In ME the system of verb morphology was affected by the same changes that affected uoun morphology. However, the distinction between singular and plural was retained in ME, although there was a good deal of leveling in the verb paradigms.
      Therefore, the inflectional system in ME was still rich enough morphologically to attract a "heavy" element.
      Early in the 16th century, the plural marking disappeared in English verb morphology and INFL became weak. Consequently, V-raising disappeared gradually in the EMnE period. We have argued that the development of do as an auxiliary is closely related to the less of v-raising. After the loss of v-raising, optional do developed as MnE auxiliary do for negatives, emphatics, and questions.
      In case there is no auxiliary verb, do is inserted under T to support the feature[+Neg]. It is argued that there is no NegP in English. Inserted of NegP, the feature [+Neg] is assumed under T. The emphatic do is also introduced in the EMnE after the loss of v-raising. When the verb cannot move to T, do must be EMnE to support the emphatic feature.
      The [+Q] feature of T must move to C in questions, but it cannot move without being supported by an overt element. A carrier is needed for a feature to move. Our basic assumption is that no feature can move alone without being supported by an overt element. In case there is no modal or aspectual auxiliary, do must be inserted under T as the "last resort" in order to support a feature of T, e.g.[+Neg],or[+Emp]

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼