RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재후보

    초등영어 학습자의 질적 어휘지식의 평가: 단어연상시험을 사용하여 = The assessment of primary English Learners` qualitative vocabulary knowledge by word-association test

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76544372

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study aimed to assess the qualitative vocabulary knowledge of primary English learners by using word-association test. Since words are the basic building blocks of language, assessing the vocabulary knowledge is both necessary and straightforward. Specially assessing how well learners know specific words will reveal the process of vocabulary learning and some aspects of mental lexicon. Revised version of Read`s (2000) word-association test was used for assessing 20 target words and their associates. Responses were categorized into three types-paradigmatic, analytic, and syntagmatic relationships. The results are as follows. First, the words in paradigmatic relationships with stimulus words showed higher rate of correct response than the cases of analytic and syntagmatic relationships. Secondly, the differences between good performers and poor performers arise from the degrees of explicitness of word meaning. Lastly, the frequency of words in the textbook was not influential on the contrary to the literature. In addition, the students` responses were affected by several factors like pronunciation, orthography and semantic properties of stimulus words. Pedagogical considerations for the development of syntagmatic word knowledge were briefly mentioned.
    번역하기

    This study aimed to assess the qualitative vocabulary knowledge of primary English learners by using word-association test. Since words are the basic building blocks of language, assessing the vocabulary knowledge is both necessary and straightforward...

    This study aimed to assess the qualitative vocabulary knowledge of primary English learners by using word-association test. Since words are the basic building blocks of language, assessing the vocabulary knowledge is both necessary and straightforward. Specially assessing how well learners know specific words will reveal the process of vocabulary learning and some aspects of mental lexicon. Revised version of Read`s (2000) word-association test was used for assessing 20 target words and their associates. Responses were categorized into three types-paradigmatic, analytic, and syntagmatic relationships. The results are as follows. First, the words in paradigmatic relationships with stimulus words showed higher rate of correct response than the cases of analytic and syntagmatic relationships. Secondly, the differences between good performers and poor performers arise from the degrees of explicitness of word meaning. Lastly, the frequency of words in the textbook was not influential on the contrary to the literature. In addition, the students` responses were affected by several factors like pronunciation, orthography and semantic properties of stimulus words. Pedagogical considerations for the development of syntagmatic word knowledge were briefly mentioned.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 임상봉, "초등학교 영어 어휘 학습과 지도에 관한 소고" 4 : 87-110, 1998

    2 김택수, "초등학교 영어 교재 어휘 분석" 대한언어학회 11 (11): 1-18, 2003

    3 배경미, "초등영어 어휘 지도 방안: 전체, 부분관계 그림과 연상기법을 중심으로" 공주대학교 2001

    4 김영태, "초등영어 어휘 분석" 7 : 49-75, 2002

    5 김영숙, "초등영어 기본 어휘에 관한 제안" 3 : 5-17, 1997

    6 김인석, "초등영어 교육을 위한 새로운 어휘 목록의 제시에 관한 연구" 5 : 105-140, 1999

    7 김도영, "의미장(semantic field)을 이용한 초등영어 어휘지도 방안 연구" 춘천교육대학교 2001

    8 현태덕, "영어 어휘지도의 실제" 현대문법학회 (39) : 217-246, 2005

    9 허경환, "어휘 지도 방안 연구: 초등영어 어휘 분석을 중심으로" 청주교육대학교 2000

    10 Kim, Seong-shik, "Word learnability in primary school English textbooks" 10 (10): 237-261, 2004

    1 임상봉, "초등학교 영어 어휘 학습과 지도에 관한 소고" 4 : 87-110, 1998

    2 김택수, "초등학교 영어 교재 어휘 분석" 대한언어학회 11 (11): 1-18, 2003

    3 배경미, "초등영어 어휘 지도 방안: 전체, 부분관계 그림과 연상기법을 중심으로" 공주대학교 2001

    4 김영태, "초등영어 어휘 분석" 7 : 49-75, 2002

    5 김영숙, "초등영어 기본 어휘에 관한 제안" 3 : 5-17, 1997

    6 김인석, "초등영어 교육을 위한 새로운 어휘 목록의 제시에 관한 연구" 5 : 105-140, 1999

    7 김도영, "의미장(semantic field)을 이용한 초등영어 어휘지도 방안 연구" 춘천교육대학교 2001

    8 현태덕, "영어 어휘지도의 실제" 현대문법학회 (39) : 217-246, 2005

    9 허경환, "어휘 지도 방안 연구: 초등영어 어휘 분석을 중심으로" 청주교육대학교 2000

    10 Kim, Seong-shik, "Word learnability in primary school English textbooks" 10 (10): 237-261, 2004

    11 Soderman, T., "Word associations of foreign language learners and native speakers: The phenomenon of a shift in response type and its relevance for lexical development. In;Near-native proficiency in English" Abo Akademi 91-182, 1993

    12 Fitzpatrick. T., "Word association patterns: Unpacking the assumptions" 17 : 319-331, 2007

    13 Piper, H., "Word association behavior as an indicator of English language proficiency. In Educational Resources Information Center (ERIC) documents. [online]. Available: Accession number ED227651"

    14 Laufer, B., "What's in a word that makes it hard or easy. In;Vocabulary: Description, acquisition and Pedagogy" Cambridge University Press 140-155, 1997

    15 Laufer, B., "Vocabulary size and use: Lexical richness in L2 written" 16 : 307-322, 1995

    16 Dale, E., "Vocabulary measurement: Techniques and major findings" 42 : 895-901, 1965

    17 Cunningham, A., "Vocabulary growth through independent reading and reading aloud to children. In;Teaching and learning vocabulary" Lawrence Erlbaum 45-68, 2005

    18 Meara, P., "V_Links: Beyond vocabulary depth. In;Angles on the English speaking world (Vol. IV): Writing & vocabulary in foreign language acquisition" Museum Tusculanum Press 85-97, 2004

    19 Cook. V., "Universal grammar and the learning and teaching of second language. In;Perspectives on pedagogical grammar" Cambridge University Press 25-48, 1991

    20 Meara, P., "Towards a new approach to modelling vocabulary acquisition. In; Vocabulary: Description, acquisition and pedagogy" Cambridge University Press 109-121, 1997

    21 Henriksen, B., "Three dimensions of vocabulary development" 21 : 303-317, 1999

    22 Singleton, D., "The second language lexicon: Some evidence from university-level learners of French and German" 7 : 61-81, 1991

    23 Richards, J., "The role of vocabulary teaching" 10 : 77-89, 1976

    24 Laufer, B., "The relationship between passive and active vocabularies: Effects of language learning context" 48 (48): 365-391, 1998

    25 Meara, P., "The dimensions of lexical competence. In;Performance and competence in second language acquisition" Cambridge University Press 35-53, 1996

    26 Read, J., "The development of a new measure of L2 vocabulary knowledge" 10 : 355-371, 1993

    27 Schoonen, R., "The assessment of deep word knowledge in young first and second language learners" 25 : 211-236, 2008

    28 Jacobs, H., "Testing ESL composition: A practical approach" Newberry House 1981

    29 Nation, P., "Teaching and learning vocabulary" Heinle & Heinle 1990

    30 Halliwell, S., "Teaching English in the primary classroom" Longman 1992

    31 Laufer, B., "Size and strength: Do we need both to measure vocabulary knowledge?" 21 (21): 202-226, 2004

    32 Zareva, A., "Relationship between lexical competence and language proficiency" 27 : 567-595, 2005

    33 Melka, F., "Receptive vs. productive aspects of vocabulary. In;Vocabulary: Description, acquisition and pedagogy" Cambridge University Press 84-102, 1997

    34 Cameron, L., "Measuring vocabulary size in English as an additional language" 6 : 145-73, 2002

    35 Wolter, B., "Lexical network structures and L2 vocabulary acquisition: The role of L1 lexical/conceptual knowledge" 27 : 741-747, 2006

    36 O' Loughlin, K., "Lexical density in candidate output on direct and semi-direct versions of an oral proficiency test" 12 : 217-237, 1995

    37 Liu, E., "Investigating learner vocabulary: A possible approach to looking at ESL/EFL learners' qualitative knowledge of the word" 39 : 171-194, 2001

    38 Bachman, L., "Fundamental considerations in language testing" Oxford University Press 1990

    39 Givon, T., "From discourse to syntax: Grammar as a processing strategy. In;Syntax and semantics (Vol. 12): Discourse and syntax" Academic Press 81-112, 1979

    40 Wolter, B., "Comparing the L1 and L2 mental lexicon: A depth of individual word knowledge model" 23 : 41-69, 2001

    41 Vermeer, A., "Breadth an depth of vocabulary in relation to L1/L2 acquisition and frequency of input" 22 : 217-234, 2001

    42 Read, J., "Assessing vocabulary" Cambridge University Press 2000

    43 Qian, D., "Assessing the roles of breadth and depth of vocabulary knowledge in reading comprehension" 56 : 282-308, 1999

    44 Paribakht, T., "Assessing second language vocabulary knowledge: Depth versus. breadth" 53 : 13-40, 1996

    45 Chapelle, A., "Are C-tests valid measures for L2 vocabulary research?" 10 : 157-87, 1994

    46 Cronbach, J., "An analysis of techniques for diagnostic vocabulary testing" 36 : 206-217, 1942

    47 Mobarg, M., "Acquiring, teaching and testing vocabulary" 7 : 201-222, 1997

    48 Laufer, B., "A vocabulary-size test of controlled productive ability" 16 : 33-51, 1999

    49 Read, J., "A framework for second language vocabulary assessment" 18 : 1-31, 2001

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2022 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2019-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2016-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2012-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2006-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.53 0.53 0.6
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.6 0.64 0.983 0.16
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼