RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      Clark-Walrasian 순환모델 비판  :  Austrain 학파의 재조명 = The Critique of Clark·Walrasian Circular Model: The Reappraisal Austrian

      한글로보기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The Clark·Walrasian Model, as reflected in circular flow diagram, forms the foundation of Keynesian, as well as Monetarist. This treatise began with a critique of Keynesian macroanalysis. In Keynes the structure of production, defined as distribution of capital among industries, is assumes to be given. So the production process stands in no relation with time. The only factor which determines the change in the production activities, is the labor. In keynes the labor unit, as a matter of definition, measures the level of employment, which is direct propotional to the changes in the demand for final output. The determination of absolute magnitude of aggregate demand is then the major issue in Keynesian macroeconomics. The supply side is implicity ignored. Monetarists are not in disagreement with Keynesian, so far they are demand oriented and tend to ignore the supply effect. In Walrasian framework Money's effect can only be neutral, i.d. money is given no role in determining the relative prices. Therefore, both approaches are not appropriate to analysis the resource allocation, so the inflationary process properly.
      The Austrian contributions are two-fold, first, it takes the factor capital into the production process : second, the non neutrality of money. Therefore, in short, the capital intensity determines the length of production process and the money plays a role in the pricing process. As the production is disaggregated in-to the different stages, the money permeates through the system. The price signals so generated induce the production of appropriate combinations of capital goods. The emphasis placed on these price signals are distinguishing feature of Austrian. The Austrian approach to money effects are therefore better appropriate not only to analyse the proper inflationary process, but also its dynamic nature, for the analysis of growth and business cycle process.


      번역하기

      The Clark·Walrasian Model, as reflected in circular flow diagram, forms the foundation of Keynesian, as well as Monetarist. This treatise began with a critique of Keynesian macroanalysis. In Keynes the structure of production, defined as distribution...

      The Clark·Walrasian Model, as reflected in circular flow diagram, forms the foundation of Keynesian, as well as Monetarist. This treatise began with a critique of Keynesian macroanalysis. In Keynes the structure of production, defined as distribution of capital among industries, is assumes to be given. So the production process stands in no relation with time. The only factor which determines the change in the production activities, is the labor. In keynes the labor unit, as a matter of definition, measures the level of employment, which is direct propotional to the changes in the demand for final output. The determination of absolute magnitude of aggregate demand is then the major issue in Keynesian macroeconomics. The supply side is implicity ignored. Monetarists are not in disagreement with Keynesian, so far they are demand oriented and tend to ignore the supply effect. In Walrasian framework Money's effect can only be neutral, i.d. money is given no role in determining the relative prices. Therefore, both approaches are not appropriate to analysis the resource allocation, so the inflationary process properly.
      The Austrian contributions are two-fold, first, it takes the factor capital into the production process : second, the non neutrality of money. Therefore, in short, the capital intensity determines the length of production process and the money plays a role in the pricing process. As the production is disaggregated in-to the different stages, the money permeates through the system. The price signals so generated induce the production of appropriate combinations of capital goods. The emphasis placed on these price signals are distinguishing feature of Austrian. The Austrian approach to money effects are therefore better appropriate not only to analyse the proper inflationary process, but also its dynamic nature, for the analysis of growth and business cycle process.


      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 서론
      • Ⅱ. Clark-Walras의 순환모델
      • 1. Keynesian의 거시모델
      • 2. Monetarist의 거시모델
      • Ⅲ. Austrian의 화폐순환도
      • Ⅰ. 서론
      • Ⅱ. Clark-Walras의 순환모델
      • 1. Keynesian의 거시모델
      • 2. Monetarist의 거시모델
      • Ⅲ. Austrian의 화폐순환도
      • 1. 우회생산(roundaboutness of production)
      • 2. 총공급과 총수요의 균형
      • 3. 화폐효과
      • Ⅳ. 요약 및 결론
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼