RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    ChatGPT를 활용한 영어글쓰기 문법 오류분석: 한국대학생 사례 연구 = The Use of ChatGPT for Grammatical Error Analysis in EFL Writing: A Case of Korean University Students

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108878042

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study examines the use of ChatGPT in analyzing grammatical errors in English writing. The purpose is to explore the effectiveness and accuracy of ChatGPT’s error analysis in comparison to human raters. Seventy-seven paragraphs written by Korean university students were analyzed by ChatGPT and two human raters based on fifteen error types. The results showed disparities in error frequencies between ChatGPT and human raters. The only similarity in error frequency identified was that both ChatGPT and human raters marked word choice error as the most frequent. However, ChatGPT detected sentence structure and informal language errors more frequently than human raters. Furthermore, ChatGPT’s analysis on individual students’ error frequency differed from that of human raters. In addition to the quantitative result of error frequency, the researcher conducted a qualitative analysis of ChatGPT’s error analysis. The results demonstrated that ChatGPT sometimes identified errors that did not exist in the students’ original texts and failed to consider the context of the original text. In many instances, ChatGPT exhibited inconsistencies in determining the appropriate error types. The findings of this study suggest that, while ChatGPT represents state-of-the-art technology, educators should be mindful of its strengths and limitations when integrating it into English writing instruction.
    번역하기

    This study examines the use of ChatGPT in analyzing grammatical errors in English writing. The purpose is to explore the effectiveness and accuracy of ChatGPT’s error analysis in comparison to human raters. Seventy-seven paragraphs written by Korean...

    This study examines the use of ChatGPT in analyzing grammatical errors in English writing. The purpose is to explore the effectiveness and accuracy of ChatGPT’s error analysis in comparison to human raters. Seventy-seven paragraphs written by Korean university students were analyzed by ChatGPT and two human raters based on fifteen error types. The results showed disparities in error frequencies between ChatGPT and human raters. The only similarity in error frequency identified was that both ChatGPT and human raters marked word choice error as the most frequent. However, ChatGPT detected sentence structure and informal language errors more frequently than human raters. Furthermore, ChatGPT’s analysis on individual students’ error frequency differed from that of human raters. In addition to the quantitative result of error frequency, the researcher conducted a qualitative analysis of ChatGPT’s error analysis. The results demonstrated that ChatGPT sometimes identified errors that did not exist in the students’ original texts and failed to consider the context of the original text. In many instances, ChatGPT exhibited inconsistencies in determining the appropriate error types. The findings of this study suggest that, while ChatGPT represents state-of-the-art technology, educators should be mindful of its strengths and limitations when integrating it into English writing instruction.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼