Detection of Vibrio cholerae O1 by Using Cerium Oxide Nanowires - Based Immunosensor with Different Antibody Immobilization Methods

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

In this work, we evaluated the effects of different antibody immobilization strategies on the response of a CeO2-nanowires (NWs)-based immunosensor for V ibrio cholerae O1 detection. Accordingly, the changes in the electron-transfer resistance (Ret) from before to after cells bind to an antibody-modified electrode prepared by using three different methods of antibody immobilization were determined. The values were 16.2%, 8.3%, and 6.65% for the method that utilized protein A, antibodies activated by 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide hydrochloride (EDC)/Nhydroxysuccinimide (NHS), and absorption, respectively. Cyclic voltammetry confirmed that the change in the current was highest for the immunosensors prepared using protein A (11%), followed by those prepared with EDC/NHS-activated antibodies (9%), and finally, those prepared through absorption (7.5%). The order of the antibody immobilization strategies in terms of resulting immunosensor detection limit and sensitivity was as follows order: absorption (3.2 × 103 CFU/mL; 45.1 /CFU·mL−1) < EDC/NHS-activated antibody (1.0 × 103 CFU/mL; 50.6 /CFU·mL−1) < protein A (1.0 × 102 CFU/mL; 65.8 /CFU·mL−1). Thus, we confirmed that the protein A - mediated method showed significantly high cell binding efficiencies compared to the random immobilization method.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 S. Weng, 184 : 1-, 2013

2 C. Song, 58 : 68-, 2014

3 G. P. Anderson, 12 : 329-, 1997

4 B. Lu, 121 : V-, 1996

5 L. Yang, 76 : 1107-, 2004

6 X. Wang, 112 : 473-, 2013

7 R. C. Alves, 64 : 19-, 2015

8 G. Yang, 706 : 120-, 2011

9 W. Jin, 39 : 185-, 2014

10 Q. Wei, 134 : 1601-, 2012

11 F. Long, 23 : 952-, 2008

12 I. M. Ciumasu, 21 : 354-, 2005

13 E. Mauriz, 69 : 359-, 2006

14 J. Buijs, 8 : 239-, 1997

15 C. D. Corso, 24 : 805-, 2008

16 Y. Wang, 49 : 492-, 2013

17 A. Ahluwalia, 7 : 207-, 1991

18 S. Chen, 19 : 2859-, 2003

19 U. Sungkanak, 26 : 784-, 2010

20 E. de Juan-Franco, 138 : 2023-, 2013

21 H. Wang, 324 : 219-, 2004

22 E. de Juan-Franco, 138 : 2023-, 2013

23 A. Kausaite-Minkstimiene, 82 : 6401-, 2010

24 R. Wang, 8 : 2625-, 2008

25 C. -C. Lin, 187 : 533-, 2013

26 P. I. Reyes, 98 : 173702-, 2011

27 A. A. Ansari, 77 : 75-, 2010

28 M. S. Wilson, 19 : 693-, 2004

29 A. Kaushik, 95 : 173703-, 2009

30 P. R. Solanki, 1 : 1-, 2014

31 J. Peng, 181 : 1505-, 2014

32 S. Babacan, 15 : 615-, 2000

33 R. Danczyk, 84 : 215-, 2003

34 S. K. Vashist, 2 : 23-, 2012

35 J. Conde, 2 : 1-, 2014

36 Burak Derkus, "Protein A immunosensor for the detection of immunoglobulin G by impedance spectroscopy" Springer Nature 37 (37): 965-976, 2014

37 Hye-Kyoung Seo, "Nanofabrication of Enzymeless Micro-Biosensors with Mesoporous Platinum and Platinum Black Working Electrodes" 한국물리학회 51 (51): 284-288, 2007

38 송민정, "Amperometric Glucose Biosensor Based on a Pt-Dispersed Hierarchically Porous Electrode" 한국물리학회 54 (54): 1612-1618, 2009

39 이지은, "A comparative study on antibody immobilization strategies onto solid surface" 한국화학공학회 30 (30): 1934-1938, 2013