RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    경찰개혁을 위한 시민신뢰에 관한 연구 = A study on problem of trust and police reform

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82701806

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Establishing trustworthy police forces is the key challenge for police reformers in low-trust settings. For many reasons, trustworthy police forces are difficult to maintain, and even harder to establish from scratch. They however remain important both to preserve where they exist and to establish where they are absent. Without them, the vulnerability of ordinary citizens to human rights abuses will be much greater. In their absence, the very idea of policing by consent will remain, at best, a phantasm. This literature therefore suggests that the process of ensuring trustworthy police. Reasons not to trust the police are, their structural location and historical functions, impunity and ``Reason to suspect``. The article concludes by pointing to some inherent limits or constraints upon trust-building, including the impact of the wider environment in which policing occurs, and the need to trust the tools we use for building trust. First, acting failrly and respectfully, Second, limiting the use of force, Third, bringing in third parties, Fourth, mobilizing trust, Fifth, trust-building at the local level Finally the role of civil society
    번역하기

    Establishing trustworthy police forces is the key challenge for police reformers in low-trust settings. For many reasons, trustworthy police forces are difficult to maintain, and even harder to establish from scratch. They however remain important bot...

    Establishing trustworthy police forces is the key challenge for police reformers in low-trust settings. For many reasons, trustworthy police forces are difficult to maintain, and even harder to establish from scratch. They however remain important both to preserve where they exist and to establish where they are absent. Without them, the vulnerability of ordinary citizens to human rights abuses will be much greater. In their absence, the very idea of policing by consent will remain, at best, a phantasm. This literature therefore suggests that the process of ensuring trustworthy police. Reasons not to trust the police are, their structural location and historical functions, impunity and ``Reason to suspect``. The article concludes by pointing to some inherent limits or constraints upon trust-building, including the impact of the wider environment in which policing occurs, and the need to trust the tools we use for building trust. First, acting failrly and respectfully, Second, limiting the use of force, Third, bringing in third parties, Fourth, mobilizing trust, Fifth, trust-building at the local level Finally the role of civil society

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 권영성, "헌법학 원론" 법문사 1999

    2 김동희, "행정법" 박영사 1999

    3 유영현, "해양경찰과 일반경찰의 신뢰유형에 따른 조직몰입도 비교" 사회과학연구원 17 (17): 191-210, 2010

    4 "조선일보. (2011). 9. 18"

    5 "조선일보. (2011). 6. 6"

    6 "조선일보. (2011). 5. 5"

    7 박종민, "정치불신의 의미" 26 (26): 57-84, 1992

    8 배귀희, "정부신뢰의 결정요인에 관한 연구: 정책선호 및 대통령의 국정수행평가를 중심으로" 한국정책학회 18 (18): 61-92, 2009

    9 김왕식, "정부신뢰에 영향을 주는 요인" 27 (27): 141-161, 2011

    10 "이투데이. (2011). 9. 28"

    1 권영성, "헌법학 원론" 법문사 1999

    2 김동희, "행정법" 박영사 1999

    3 유영현, "해양경찰과 일반경찰의 신뢰유형에 따른 조직몰입도 비교" 사회과학연구원 17 (17): 191-210, 2010

    4 "조선일보. (2011). 9. 18"

    5 "조선일보. (2011). 6. 6"

    6 "조선일보. (2011). 5. 5"

    7 박종민, "정치불신의 의미" 26 (26): 57-84, 1992

    8 배귀희, "정부신뢰의 결정요인에 관한 연구: 정책선호 및 대통령의 국정수행평가를 중심으로" 한국정책학회 18 (18): 61-92, 2009

    9 김왕식, "정부신뢰에 영향을 주는 요인" 27 (27): 141-161, 2011

    10 "이투데이. (2011). 9. 28"

    11 "서울신문.(2008). 4. 1"

    12 조기숙, "대통령의 리더십과 정부신뢰: 노무현 대통령 사례를 중심으로" 극동문제연구소 23 (23): 61-92, 2007

    13 "뉴시스. (2011). 9. 6"

    14 "뉴스토마토. (2011). 8. 29"

    15 "노컷뉴스. (2011). 7. 18"

    16 이승주, "경찰행정학" 고시뱅크 2007

    17 이윤호, "경찰학" 박영사 2006

    18 주재진, "경찰에 대한 민원인의 신뢰영향 요인에 관한 연구" 한국경찰학회 10 (10): 329-354, 2008

    19 Lea, J., "What Is to Be Done about Law and Order" Penguin 1984

    20 Mishler, W., "Trust in Untrustworthy Institutions: Culture and Institutional Performance in Post-communist Societies" Centre for the Study of Public Policy 1998

    21 Misztal, B., "Trust in Modern Societies: The Search for the Bases of Social Order" Polity Press 1996

    22 Hardin, R., "Trust in Government, In Trust and Governance" Russell Sage 9-27, 1998

    23 Tyler,Tom R., "Trust and Democratic Governance, In Trust and Governance" Russell Sage Foundation 269-294, 1998

    24 박재풍, "Third party policing 도입에 관한 연구" 한국경찰학회 13 (13): 133-160, 2011

    25 Sunshine, J., "The Role of Procedural Justice and Legitimacy in Shaping Public Support for Policing" 17 : 513-547, 2003

    26 Reiner, R., "The Politics of the Police" Oxford University Press 2000

    27 Chanley, Virginia A., "The Origins and Consequences of Public Trust in Government: A Time Series Analysis" 64 (64): 239-256, 2000

    28 Six, F., "The Dynamics of Trust and Trouble, In The Trust Process in Organizations" Edward Elgar 196-221, 2003

    29 Almond, G. A., "The Civic Culture: Political Attitud es and Democracy in Five Nations" Princeton Univers ity Press 1963

    30 Reisig, M., "Suspect Disrespect towards the Police" 21 : 241-246, 2004

    31 Levi, M., "Social and unsocial capital" 24 : 45-55, 1996

    32 Reef, M., "Political Alienation and Efficacy, In Measures of Political Attitudes" Academic Press 1999

    33 Muir, W., "Police: Streetcorner Politicians" University of Chicago Press 1977

    34 Goldsmith, A., "Police reform and the problem of trust" 9 (9): 443-470, 2005

    35 Lyons, W., "Partnerships, Information and Public Safety: Comm unity Policing in a Time of Terror" 25 : 530-542, 2002

    36 Inglehart, R., "Modernization and Post-modernization: Cultural, E conomic, and Political Change in 43 Societies" Princet on University Press 1997

    37 Skocpol, T., "Making Sense of the Civic Engagement Debate, In Civic Engagement in American Democracy" Brookings Institute Press 1999

    38 Putnam, R. D., "Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy" Princeton University Press 1993

    39 Warren, M., "Introduction, In Democracy and Distrust" Cambridge University Press 1999

    40 Kaase, M., "Interpersonal Trust, Political Trust and Non-instituti onalized Political Participation in Western Europe" 22 (22): 1-21, 1999

    41 Braithwaite, J., "Institutionalizing Distrust, Enculturating Trust, In Trust and Governance" Russell Sage 343-345, 1998

    42 Weitzer, R., "Incidents of Police Misconduct and Public Opinion" 30 : 397-408, 2002

    43 Peter, Evans, "Government Action, Social Capital and Development: Reviewing the Evidence on Synergy" 24 (24): 1119-1132, 1996

    44 National Research Council, "Fairness and Effectiveness in Policing: The Evidence" National Academies Press 2004

    45 Muller, E. N., "Diffuse Political Support and Anti-system Political Behavior: A Comparative Analysis" 26 : 240-264, 1982

    46 Mulgan, R., "Accountability and Governance, In Are Your Being Served? State, Citizens and Governance" Allen and Unwin 2001

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2007-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.24 1.24 1.14
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.09 0.97 1.211 0.55
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼