RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      Panel Analysis of the Impact from the Logistics Performance Index on the Value-Added Logistics Industry: The Significance of LPI Sub-Indicators

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A110121447

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Purpose: This study empirically evaluates the relationship between the Logistics Performance Index (LPI) and the economic performance of the logistics industry, specifically focusing on value-added logistics across top-performing countries.
      Research design, data, and methodology: The analysis takes a balanced panel dataset of 20 countries with the highest LPI rankings for 2007, 2010, 2012, 2014, 2016, 2018, and 2023, which correspond to LPI publication years. Fixed-effects panel regression models are employed to examine the impact from the overall LPI and its six sub-indicators on logtransformed value-added logistics. Control variables included GDP per capita, total population, trade openness, urbanization rate, and land area. Yearly dummy variables are incorporated to control for temporal effects.
      Results: Neither the overall LPI index nor any of its sub-components had as tatistically significant impact on value-added logistics. In contrast, structural factors such as GDP per capita, urbanization rate, and land area exhibited significant effects. The inclusion of dummy variables revealed that certain years (particularly 2016) had negative effects, possibly due to global economic downturns.
      Conclusions: While the LPI is a useful indicator for assessing national logistics performance, it does not adequately capture the economic output of the logistics sector. Policymakers should thus consider broader structural factors and long-term development strategies, rather than focusing solely on performance metrics. This study contributes to the literature by shifting the focus from trade-centric evaluations to the LPI’s relevance in sectoral economic contributions.
      번역하기

      Purpose: This study empirically evaluates the relationship between the Logistics Performance Index (LPI) and the economic performance of the logistics industry, specifically focusing on value-added logistics across top-performing countries. Research d...

      Purpose: This study empirically evaluates the relationship between the Logistics Performance Index (LPI) and the economic performance of the logistics industry, specifically focusing on value-added logistics across top-performing countries.
      Research design, data, and methodology: The analysis takes a balanced panel dataset of 20 countries with the highest LPI rankings for 2007, 2010, 2012, 2014, 2016, 2018, and 2023, which correspond to LPI publication years. Fixed-effects panel regression models are employed to examine the impact from the overall LPI and its six sub-indicators on logtransformed value-added logistics. Control variables included GDP per capita, total population, trade openness, urbanization rate, and land area. Yearly dummy variables are incorporated to control for temporal effects.
      Results: Neither the overall LPI index nor any of its sub-components had as tatistically significant impact on value-added logistics. In contrast, structural factors such as GDP per capita, urbanization rate, and land area exhibited significant effects. The inclusion of dummy variables revealed that certain years (particularly 2016) had negative effects, possibly due to global economic downturns.
      Conclusions: While the LPI is a useful indicator for assessing national logistics performance, it does not adequately capture the economic output of the logistics sector. Policymakers should thus consider broader structural factors and long-term development strategies, rather than focusing solely on performance metrics. This study contributes to the literature by shifting the focus from trade-centric evaluations to the LPI’s relevance in sectoral economic contributions.

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼