RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      글로벌 항만공사 중대성 평가 분석을 통한 한국 항만공기업 ESG 지표 개선 연구 = Improving ESG Indicators for Korean Port Authorities through Criticality Assessment Analysis of Global Port Authorities

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A110121448

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Purpose: This study analyzes the structural characteristics of ESG materiality assessment systems and assesses the indicators implemented by leading global port authorities in order to propose directions for improving ESG indicators suitable for South Korea’s authorities.
      Research design, data, and methodology: The study analyzes ESG management reports and the materiality assessment results of Korea’s four major port authorities. It also examines the ESG reports and annual reports of six global port authorities and operators—Rotterdam, Antwerp, Singapore PSA, Tianjin Port, the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, and DP World—to derive materiality assessment processes, core themes, management systems, and distinctive indicators.
      Results: Regarding environmental indicators, although domestic port authorities’ indicator selections show some linkage compared to advanced global ports, they lack differentiated indicators for ecosystem protection, eco-friendly technology, and ESG risk management. Specifically identified as necessary are the following: establishing a global-level ESG indicator system, implementing climate-scenario-based risk management, developing social and environmental indicators that reflect regional and industrial characteristics, and creating integrated KPIs linked to ESG management.
      Conclusions: Domestic port authorities lack differentiated advanced indicators in areas such as smart ports, ecosystem protection, eco-friendly technologies, and ESG risk management. Indicators in these areas require improvement and supplementation.
      번역하기

      Purpose: This study analyzes the structural characteristics of ESG materiality assessment systems and assesses the indicators implemented by leading global port authorities in order to propose directions for improving ESG indicators suitable for South...

      Purpose: This study analyzes the structural characteristics of ESG materiality assessment systems and assesses the indicators implemented by leading global port authorities in order to propose directions for improving ESG indicators suitable for South Korea’s authorities.
      Research design, data, and methodology: The study analyzes ESG management reports and the materiality assessment results of Korea’s four major port authorities. It also examines the ESG reports and annual reports of six global port authorities and operators—Rotterdam, Antwerp, Singapore PSA, Tianjin Port, the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, and DP World—to derive materiality assessment processes, core themes, management systems, and distinctive indicators.
      Results: Regarding environmental indicators, although domestic port authorities’ indicator selections show some linkage compared to advanced global ports, they lack differentiated indicators for ecosystem protection, eco-friendly technology, and ESG risk management. Specifically identified as necessary are the following: establishing a global-level ESG indicator system, implementing climate-scenario-based risk management, developing social and environmental indicators that reflect regional and industrial characteristics, and creating integrated KPIs linked to ESG management.
      Conclusions: Domestic port authorities lack differentiated advanced indicators in areas such as smart ports, ecosystem protection, eco-friendly technologies, and ESG risk management. Indicators in these areas require improvement and supplementation.

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼