RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      계산 강수균 교수 회갑 기념호 : 노자와 화이트헤드의 자연관에 대한 연구시론 = A Study on the viewpoint of Nature of Whitehead and Lao Tzu

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A40101629

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      For the relations between nature and human, a modern viewpoint of nature, that is to say, a viewpoint of mechanism of nature issued from substantialism has represented that human is prevalent over nature. And so it produced the destruction of nature. It makes therefore, being itself impossible in such a relation. On the other hand, a viewpoint of organism of nature issued from Whitehead`s organic philosophy indicates that the relations between nature and human are equivalent each other. And so it can prevent nature from being destroyed. It makes therefore, being itself possible in such a relation. Lastly, a viewpoint of Lao Tzu`s nature says that nature is prevalent over human. And so his nature having its mentality and its subjectivity means the source of everything and at that time, the highest master. Thus, in both Whitehead and Lao Tzu, it is evident that the position of nature is not inferior to human. This paper can come to conclusion that first, Whitehead and Lao Tzu, their viewpoints contrary to the modern viewpoint, will contribute to elevating its position and to changing our point of viewpoint of nature, second, the point of viewpoint undergone a change will have us not to deal with nature at random, and third, it will have us to arouse respects for nature and to get a new attitude of life in coexisting with it.
      번역하기

      For the relations between nature and human, a modern viewpoint of nature, that is to say, a viewpoint of mechanism of nature issued from substantialism has represented that human is prevalent over nature. And so it produced the destruction of nature. ...

      For the relations between nature and human, a modern viewpoint of nature, that is to say, a viewpoint of mechanism of nature issued from substantialism has represented that human is prevalent over nature. And so it produced the destruction of nature. It makes therefore, being itself impossible in such a relation. On the other hand, a viewpoint of organism of nature issued from Whitehead`s organic philosophy indicates that the relations between nature and human are equivalent each other. And so it can prevent nature from being destroyed. It makes therefore, being itself possible in such a relation. Lastly, a viewpoint of Lao Tzu`s nature says that nature is prevalent over human. And so his nature having its mentality and its subjectivity means the source of everything and at that time, the highest master. Thus, in both Whitehead and Lao Tzu, it is evident that the position of nature is not inferior to human. This paper can come to conclusion that first, Whitehead and Lao Tzu, their viewpoints contrary to the modern viewpoint, will contribute to elevating its position and to changing our point of viewpoint of nature, second, the point of viewpoint undergone a change will have us not to deal with nature at random, and third, it will have us to arouse respects for nature and to get a new attitude of life in coexisting with it.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼