RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      일제식민지배기 한국민족말살을 위한 주요 법제와 정책 = A Study on the Laws and Policy to Korean Nation Eradication under the Rule of Japanese Imperialism

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104834764

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      One hundred years ago(1910 A.D.), Imperial Japan swallowed up Dae-Han Empire(Korea) with coercive measures. Japanese Imperialism made a promise Korea to guard that he would support the independence of Korea and the peace of the Orient. But Imperialist Japan, the promise to Korea was fraud, and absorbed Korea into his government making use of diplomatic skills that was isolated Korea.


      In 明治(Meiji) period Japan, nationalist ideology consisted of a blend of native and imported political philosophies, initially developed by the Meiji government to promote national unity and patriotism, first in defense against colonization by European powers, and later in a struggle to attain equality with the Great Powers. It evolved through the 大正(Taisho) period and 昭和(Showa) periods to justify an increasingly totalitarian government and overseas expansionism.
      In the late 19th and early 20th century, various Western countries actively competed for influence, trade, goods, and territory in East Asia. And Japan sought to join these modern colonial powers. The newly modernized 明治(Meiji) government of Japan turned to Korea, then in the sphere of influence of China's 淸(Qing) Dynasty. The Japanese government initially sought to separate Korea from Qing and make Korea a Japanese colonialization in order to further the encroachment of the Asian Continent.
      After all, on 22 August 1910, Japan effectively annexed Korea with the Japan-Korea Annexation Treaty, and that was made public on 29 Aug. 1910. But the scholars succeeded in revealing that Japan coerced Korea to sign two treaties that led to the colonization of the latter, pointing out that they were illegal. By using threats and intimidation, the island nation concluded the Japan-Korea Protocol in 1905(illegally signed in September 1905), and the Japan-Korea Annexation Treaty in 1910.
      Focus of this article was mainly placed upon the function of laws in Japan's colonial laws and policy, and the unification strategies adopted in the fields of culture and education were designed to eradicate the individual ethnicity of the Korean race. Eventually the fixed purpose of Japan's colonial laws and policy were to eradicate the individual ethnicity of the Korean race, and secondly was to dispossess Korean of his property. Imperialist Japan contemplated to eradicate Korean race through the colonial laws and policy. Imperialist Japan regarded laws as instruments to dominate Korea with injustice and dishonesty.


      From this point of view, <創氏改名>(Being compelled to create Korean's family name and change his personal name) was the heart of the matter that was to eradicate the individual ethnicity of the Korean race, in the eye of the laws. By 1939, the focus of the policy of Japanese Imperialism had shifted towards colonial assimilation, and <勅令第19号 ‘朝鮮民事令改正令’>(Imperial Decree 19 on the Revision of Korean Civil Affairs, on 10 Nov. 1939) went into effect, whereby ethnic Koreans were permitted to surrender their Korean family name and adopt Japanese surnames. Although officially voluntary, many argued official compulsion and harassment existed against individuals.
      Reflecting on the Japanese colonial government, We koreans should keep the cause of world peace, social justice, and rule of laws in mind.
      번역하기

      One hundred years ago(1910 A.D.), Imperial Japan swallowed up Dae-Han Empire(Korea) with coercive measures. Japanese Imperialism made a promise Korea to guard that he would support the independence of Korea and the peace of the Orient. But Imperialist...

      One hundred years ago(1910 A.D.), Imperial Japan swallowed up Dae-Han Empire(Korea) with coercive measures. Japanese Imperialism made a promise Korea to guard that he would support the independence of Korea and the peace of the Orient. But Imperialist Japan, the promise to Korea was fraud, and absorbed Korea into his government making use of diplomatic skills that was isolated Korea.


      In 明治(Meiji) period Japan, nationalist ideology consisted of a blend of native and imported political philosophies, initially developed by the Meiji government to promote national unity and patriotism, first in defense against colonization by European powers, and later in a struggle to attain equality with the Great Powers. It evolved through the 大正(Taisho) period and 昭和(Showa) periods to justify an increasingly totalitarian government and overseas expansionism.
      In the late 19th and early 20th century, various Western countries actively competed for influence, trade, goods, and territory in East Asia. And Japan sought to join these modern colonial powers. The newly modernized 明治(Meiji) government of Japan turned to Korea, then in the sphere of influence of China's 淸(Qing) Dynasty. The Japanese government initially sought to separate Korea from Qing and make Korea a Japanese colonialization in order to further the encroachment of the Asian Continent.
      After all, on 22 August 1910, Japan effectively annexed Korea with the Japan-Korea Annexation Treaty, and that was made public on 29 Aug. 1910. But the scholars succeeded in revealing that Japan coerced Korea to sign two treaties that led to the colonization of the latter, pointing out that they were illegal. By using threats and intimidation, the island nation concluded the Japan-Korea Protocol in 1905(illegally signed in September 1905), and the Japan-Korea Annexation Treaty in 1910.
      Focus of this article was mainly placed upon the function of laws in Japan's colonial laws and policy, and the unification strategies adopted in the fields of culture and education were designed to eradicate the individual ethnicity of the Korean race. Eventually the fixed purpose of Japan's colonial laws and policy were to eradicate the individual ethnicity of the Korean race, and secondly was to dispossess Korean of his property. Imperialist Japan contemplated to eradicate Korean race through the colonial laws and policy. Imperialist Japan regarded laws as instruments to dominate Korea with injustice and dishonesty.


      From this point of view, <創氏改名>(Being compelled to create Korean's family name and change his personal name) was the heart of the matter that was to eradicate the individual ethnicity of the Korean race, in the eye of the laws. By 1939, the focus of the policy of Japanese Imperialism had shifted towards colonial assimilation, and <勅令第19号 ‘朝鮮民事令改正令’>(Imperial Decree 19 on the Revision of Korean Civil Affairs, on 10 Nov. 1939) went into effect, whereby ethnic Koreans were permitted to surrender their Korean family name and adopt Japanese surnames. Although officially voluntary, many argued official compulsion and harassment existed against individuals.
      Reflecting on the Japanese colonial government, We koreans should keep the cause of world peace, social justice, and rule of laws in mind.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 金澤賢, "歷史와 眞實" 靑史 1982

      2 홍순호, "한일외교의 국제관계사적 성찰. in: 광복50주년기념논문집 권1" 한국학술진흥재단 1995

      3 홍순호, "한일외교의 국제관계사적 성찰" 한국학술진흥재단 1995

      4 국회도서관, "한말근대법령자료집" 국회도서관

      5 한글학회, "한글학회50년사" 한글학회 1971

      6 송건호, "한국현대사론" 한국신학연구소출판부 1984

      7 이기백, "한국사시민강좌 (창간호)" 일조각 1987

      8 이태진, "한국병합의 불법성연구" 서울대 출판부 2003

      9 이태진, "한국병합과 현대--역사적 국제법적 재검토" 태학사 2009

      10 심희기, "한국법제사강의" 삼영사 1997

      1 金澤賢, "歷史와 眞實" 靑史 1982

      2 홍순호, "한일외교의 국제관계사적 성찰. in: 광복50주년기념논문집 권1" 한국학술진흥재단 1995

      3 홍순호, "한일외교의 국제관계사적 성찰" 한국학술진흥재단 1995

      4 국회도서관, "한말근대법령자료집" 국회도서관

      5 한글학회, "한글학회50년사" 한글학회 1971

      6 송건호, "한국현대사론" 한국신학연구소출판부 1984

      7 이기백, "한국사시민강좌 (창간호)" 일조각 1987

      8 이태진, "한국병합의 불법성연구" 서울대 출판부 2003

      9 이태진, "한국병합과 현대--역사적 국제법적 재검토" 태학사 2009

      10 심희기, "한국법제사강의" 삼영사 1997

      11 신용하, "한국민족의 형성과 민족사회학" 지식산업사 2001

      12 조동걸, "한국근대학생운동조직의 성격변화, 한국근대민족주의운동사연구" 일조각 1987

      13 손인수, "한국개화교육연구" 일지사 1985

      14 정광현, "한국가족법연구" 서울대출판부 1967

      15 한인섭, "치안유지법과 식민지통제법령의 전개. in: 한국법사학논총" 박영사 1991

      16 신용하, "조선토지조사사업연구" 지식산업사 1981

      17 이명화, "조선총독부의 언어동화정책" 9 : 1995

      18 조선일보, "조선일보, ‘珍島사건에 대하여’, 1924.12. 7"

      19 이종길, "조선사회법사고" 동아대출판부 2007

      20 조동걸, "일제하한국농민운동사" 한길사 1978

      21 김준철, "일제하의 한국민족자본과 민족사학에 관한 연구" 상조사 1984

      22 박병호, "일제하의 가족정책과 관습법형성과정. in: 가족법논집" 진원 1996

      23 최민지, "일제하민족언론사론" 일월서각 1978

      24 신동운, "일제하 형사절차에 관한 연구. in: 한국법사학논총" 박영사 1991

      25 이상욱, "일제하 전통가족법의 왜곡. in: 한국법사학논총" 1991

      26 이지원, "일제하 민족문화인식의 전개와 민족문화운동--민족주의 계열을 중심으로" 서울대학교 2004

      27 신용하, "일제의 한국민족말살 ‘황국신민화’정책. in: 백범과민족운동연구" 2006

      28 김용욱, "일제에 의한 가족법제의 왜곡과 청산" 한국학술진흥재단 1995

      29 최유리, "일제말기 식민지지배정책연구" 국학자료원 1997

      30 김성준, "일제강점하 조선어말살정책연구--조선교육령을 중심으로" 105 : 2004

      31 박경식, "일본제국주의의 조선지배" 청아출판사 1986

      32 김동명, "일본제국주의의 식민지 지배체제의 개편--3.1운동직후 조선에서의 동화주의 지배체제의 확정" 9 : 1998

      33 김창록, "일본제국주의의 식민지 지배구조의 성격. in: 광복50주년기념논문집 권1" 한국학술진흥재단 1995

      34 김용섭, "일본·한국에 있어서의 한국사서술" 31 : 1966

      35 한인섭, "식민지 형사법제의 구조와 유산, 그 청산의 문제. in: 광복50주년기념논집1" 한국학술진흥재단 1995

      36 김창록, "식민지 피지배기 법제의 기초" (8) : 1995

      37 김용섭, "수탈을 위한 측량. in: 한국근대민족운동사" 돌베개 1980

      38 신주백, "만주지역 한인의 민족운동사(1925~45)" 아세아문화사 1999

      39 동아일보, "동아일보, ‘官民野合의 漁利運動’, 1924. 4. 2"

      40 대한변협신문, "대한변협신문, 법률가 이준열사와 기자, 2010.6.21(제309호)"

      41 정긍식, "국역관습조사보고서" 한국법제연구원 1992

      42 "국민정신총동원조선연맹강령 실천요목 규약 조직대강" (創刊) : 1939

      43 광주학생독립운동동지회, "광주학생독립운동사" 국제문화사 1974

      44 김기석, "광무제의 주권수호외교--1905~1907, 일본의 대한제국강점" 까치 1995

      45 학술진흥재단, "과거청산, 광복50주년기념 기념논문집 권1" 학술진흥재단 1995

      46 유영익, "갑오경장연구" 일조각 1990

      47 朝鮮總督時代關係資料, "齋藤實關係文書, 권2" 朝鮮總督時代關係資料

      48 朝鮮總督時代資料, "齋藤實文書2, ‘朝鮮總督府官制改革ニ關スル勅語’" 朝鮮總督時代資料 1919

      49 "韓國警察事務委託ニ關スル覺書."

      50 農商工部水産局, "韓國水産誌"

      51 "韓國倂合에 관한 件 및 對韓施設大綱"

      52 朝鮮總督府, "韓國ノ保護及倂合" 朝鮮總督府 1917

      53 "陣中日誌(全三冊), 토지주택박물관 연구총서 제15집" 2010

      54 南次郞, "道知事會議 に於ける總督指示, 1939.5.29"

      55 朝鮮總督府官房文書課, "諭告 訓示 演述總攬" 朝鮮行政學會 1941

      56 "統監府法令資料集(上)(下)" 1972

      57 野村調太郞, "祖上の祭祀と現行の法律" 5 (5): 1926

      58 宮田節子, "皇民化政策の構造" 29 : 1991

      59 "現代史資料 26, 朝鮮 2" みすず書房 1973

      60 鈴木敬夫, "法을 통한 朝鮮植民地支配에 관한 硏究" 高麗大民族文化硏究所 1989

      61 奧平康弘, "治安維持法小史" 築摩書房 1977

      62 三宅正太郞, "治安維持法, 現代法學全集 第37卷" 日本評論社 1931

      63 奧平康弘, "治安維持法" みすず書房 1973

      64 小田中聰樹, "治安政策と法の展開過程" 法律文化社 1982

      65 "東亞日報廢刊ニ對スル關屋氏ノ質疑要領"

      66 金正明, "朝鮮獨立運動1" 原書房 1967

      67 朝鮮總督府官制, "朝鮮法令輯覽(上)"

      68 朝鮮總督府學務局, "朝鮮敎育要覽" 朝鮮總督府學務局

      69 大野謙一, "朝鮮敎育問題管見" 朝鮮敎育會 1936

      70 高橋兵吉, "朝鮮敎育史考" 帝國地方行政學會 朝鮮本部 1927

      71 姜在彦, "朝鮮問題における內田良平の思想と行動" 1966

      72 釋尾東邦, "朝鮮倂合史"

      73 姜在彦, "朝鮮の開化思想" 岩波書店 1980

      74 朝鮮總督府庶務調査部, "朝鮮の獨立事想及運動"

      75 松岡修太郞, "朝鮮に於ける行政權及びその立法權竝びに司法權との關係" 京城帝大法文學會 4 :

      76 明石博隆, "昭和特高彈壓史 6" 太平出版社 1975

      77 小森德治, "明石元二郞(上)" 臺灣日日新報社 1928

      78 李淑子, "日本統治下朝鮮における日本語敎育--朝鮮敎育令との關連において--" (75) : 1975

      79 金圭昇, "日本の植民地法制の硏究" 社會評論社 1987

      80 南興祐, "日帝의 韓國侵略에 있어서의 法規範과 그 適用에 관한 問題" (33) : 1969

      81 崔由利, "日帝末期 言論政策의 性格--동아 조선일보의 폐간을 중심으로" 20, 21 : 1993

      82 孫禎睦, "日帝下 夫餘神宮運營과 소위 扶餘神都 建設" 49 : 1987

      83 中野正剛, "我か觀たる滿鮮" 政敎社 1915

      84 齊藤榮治, "大正8年 制令第7號む論ず" 2 (2): 1923

      85 "南總督談話,司法上に於ける內鮮一體の具現--內地人式氏の設定に就て"

      86 정운현, "創氏改名" 학민사 1994

      87 鈴木敬夫, "倂合以前の治安法. in: 韓國法史學論叢" 박영사 1991

      88 野村滿, "保安法(光武11年 法律第2號)の史的素描" 22 (22): 1943

      89 "三一獨立運動(全四冊)" 原書房 1983

      90 정창석, "‘내선일체’논리의 양상" 42 : 1999

      91 운노 후쿠주(海野 福壽), "‘韓日合拼條約과 韓日協定에 관하여’. in: 과거청산과 21세기의 한일관계" 2000

      92 大野文書, "‘諺文新聞統制ノ必要性’"

      93 ADAMSCHAFF, "History and Truth" Pergamon Press 1976

      94 이태진, "1905년 조약 강제시의 한국주차군의 성격" 54 : 2008

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2005-05-11 학술지등록 한글명 : 법제연구
      외국어명 : JOURNAL OF LEGISLATION RESEARCH
      KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.69 0.69 0.55
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.48 0.43 0.692 0
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼