RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI우수등재

      조선시대 赤潮의 발생과 대응

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103209581

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Red tide is natural calamity that has constantly occurred in the past. When 『The True Record of the Joseon Dynasty』 and the like were examined, the frequency of occurrence was lower than that of other natural calamities, but red tide was classified as natural calamity that the state should pay attention to. Red tide was understood as reprimand that God gave to the king, based on traditional theory of a Natural Disaster.
      The biggest damage of red tide was the death of fish and shellfish like the present. And there occurred a case people were poisoned or died because they ate fish and shellfish which had died due to the toxic substance of red tide. Therefore, if red tide occurred in the seas where seafood to be offered to the king was collected, the collection and offer of seafood was prohibited. When red tide occurred, the emitted fishy smell sometimes caused problem with the production of salt.
      When red tide occurred, the first measure taken by the Joseon government was Haegoe ritual. Red tide was regarded as strange natural calamity that god allowed. So, ancestral rites to resolve this was performed. And king"s fear very greatly and Introspection was emphasized. When red tide occurred, government officials used it as a chance to deliver a remonstrance on the king"s mistake and take a political countermeasure for dealing with matter or case which was not settled in ordinary times through the press by using heavenly judgment and natural calamity as excuse.
      번역하기

      Red tide is natural calamity that has constantly occurred in the past. When 『The True Record of the Joseon Dynasty』 and the like were examined, the frequency of occurrence was lower than that of other natural calamities, but red tide was classifie...

      Red tide is natural calamity that has constantly occurred in the past. When 『The True Record of the Joseon Dynasty』 and the like were examined, the frequency of occurrence was lower than that of other natural calamities, but red tide was classified as natural calamity that the state should pay attention to. Red tide was understood as reprimand that God gave to the king, based on traditional theory of a Natural Disaster.
      The biggest damage of red tide was the death of fish and shellfish like the present. And there occurred a case people were poisoned or died because they ate fish and shellfish which had died due to the toxic substance of red tide. Therefore, if red tide occurred in the seas where seafood to be offered to the king was collected, the collection and offer of seafood was prohibited. When red tide occurred, the emitted fishy smell sometimes caused problem with the production of salt.
      When red tide occurred, the first measure taken by the Joseon government was Haegoe ritual. Red tide was regarded as strange natural calamity that god allowed. So, ancestral rites to resolve this was performed. And king"s fear very greatly and Introspection was emphasized. When red tide occurred, government officials used it as a chance to deliver a remonstrance on the king"s mistake and take a political countermeasure for dealing with matter or case which was not settled in ordinary times through the press by using heavenly judgment and natural calamity as excuse.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 머리말
      • Ⅱ. 적조 발생현황
      • Ⅲ. 적조 발생의 이해와 피해상
      • Ⅳ. 적조 발생에 대한 대응
      • Ⅴ. 맺음말
      • Ⅰ. 머리말
      • Ⅱ. 적조 발생현황
      • Ⅲ. 적조 발생의 이해와 피해상
      • Ⅳ. 적조 발생에 대한 대응
      • Ⅴ. 맺음말
      • 참고문헌
      • Abstract
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 한상복, "한반도의 적조 조사와 연근해 탐사" 한수당자연환경연구원 2011

      2 이태진, "한국 사상사 방법론" 소화 1997

      3 이석규, "조선초기의 天人合一論과 재이론" 진단학회 81 : 1996

      4 민승환, "조선왕조실록의 적조(HABs) 고찰" 한국지리정보학회 16 (16): 120-140, 2013

      5 권용란, "조선시대 “解怪祭” 연구" 한국역사민속학회 (22) : 217-241, 2006

      6 장학규, "연산군의 재이론에 대한 인식변화-군권·언권 논쟁을 중심으로" 부산경남사학회 7 : 1995

      7 한상복, "삼국시대의 적조현상 기록" 한국어촌어항협회 1997

      8 최종성, "국행기우제와 민간기우제의 비교연구" 서울대학교 종교학연구회 16 : 1997

      9 김일권, "고려사의 자연학과 오행지 역주" 한국학중앙연구원출판부 2011

      10 국립문화재연구소, "解怪祭謄錄"

      1 한상복, "한반도의 적조 조사와 연근해 탐사" 한수당자연환경연구원 2011

      2 이태진, "한국 사상사 방법론" 소화 1997

      3 이석규, "조선초기의 天人合一論과 재이론" 진단학회 81 : 1996

      4 민승환, "조선왕조실록의 적조(HABs) 고찰" 한국지리정보학회 16 (16): 120-140, 2013

      5 권용란, "조선시대 “解怪祭” 연구" 한국역사민속학회 (22) : 217-241, 2006

      6 장학규, "연산군의 재이론에 대한 인식변화-군권·언권 논쟁을 중심으로" 부산경남사학회 7 : 1995

      7 한상복, "삼국시대의 적조현상 기록" 한국어촌어항협회 1997

      8 최종성, "국행기우제와 민간기우제의 비교연구" 서울대학교 종교학연구회 16 : 1997

      9 김일권, "고려사의 자연학과 오행지 역주" 한국학중앙연구원출판부 2011

      10 국립문화재연구소, "解怪祭謄錄"

      11 金鑢, "藫庭遺藁"

      12 趙慶男, "續雜錄"

      13 李肯翊, "燃藜室記述"

      14 "朝鮮王朝實錄"

      15 董仲舒, "春秋繁露"

      16 "承政院日記"

      17 "國朝寶鑑"

      18 李圭景, "五洲衍文長箋散稿"

      19 이상호, "『조선왕조실록朝鮮王朝實錄』에 나타난 성종기成宗期 재이관災異觀의 특징" 한국국학진흥원 (21) : 357-388, 2012

      20 김우형, "『經筵日記』에 나타난 율곡의 災異觀" (사)율곡학회 18 : 59-85, 2009

      21 경석현, "『朝鮮王朝實錄』 災異 기록의 재인식 -16세기 災異論의 정치・사상적 기능을 중심으로-" 한국사연구회 (160) : 47-82, 2013

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2020 평가예정 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
      2015-01-01 평가 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      1999-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.05 1.05 0.91
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.84 0.75 1.505 0.51
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼