RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    신도시 건설기본계획 수립과정에서 주민참여 제고방안 = 세종시 도시건설기본계획 수립과정을 중심으로

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99723854

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    In this study, a new process to encourage active citizen participation is proposed for next newtown planning process by analyzing the result of the citizen participation during the master planning process of the Multi-functional Administrative City(MAC). The master plan for MAC was mainly designed by expert group, while the citizen participation was engaged in each step of the process such as, for example, the information acquisition and analysis process based on research survey with targeting a citizen group, the open seminars for 15 individual fields of plans during the proposal report process, and the public hearings during the decision process, which made remarkable difference with other previous plans. However, the review process to answer the questions about who, what, where, how, when to conduct the citizen participation was missed. Therefore, like MAC, a newtown in a remote area need special citizen participation plan dealing with the essential issue like how to define the citizen and which to identify the citizen with a subject or a control object.
    번역하기

    In this study, a new process to encourage active citizen participation is proposed for next newtown planning process by analyzing the result of the citizen participation during the master planning process of the Multi-functional Administrative City(MA...

    In this study, a new process to encourage active citizen participation is proposed for next newtown planning process by analyzing the result of the citizen participation during the master planning process of the Multi-functional Administrative City(MAC). The master plan for MAC was mainly designed by expert group, while the citizen participation was engaged in each step of the process such as, for example, the information acquisition and analysis process based on research survey with targeting a citizen group, the open seminars for 15 individual fields of plans during the proposal report process, and the public hearings during the decision process, which made remarkable difference with other previous plans. However, the review process to answer the questions about who, what, where, how, when to conduct the citizen participation was missed. Therefore, like MAC, a newtown in a remote area need special citizen participation plan dealing with the essential issue like how to define the citizen and which to identify the citizen with a subject or a control object.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼