RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    Post-Damage Reconfiguration for Rotorcraft with Control Redundancy.

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T16601205

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Aircraft survivability in the event of component failure or some loss of control effectiveness is a critical area of research, particularly with regards to the control system design. While this has been thoroughly researched for fixed-wing aircraft since the 1980s, there has been a lack of a similar body of work for rotorcraft. This lack is mainly due to the absence of control redundancy on a conventional single main rotor helicopter. A fully compounded helicopter bridges this gap by adding fixed-wing control surfaces (flaps, ailerons, stabilator, and rudder) and compound-specific auxiliary controls (propeller thrust and main rotor speed). When the platform of interest possesses a significant amount of control redundancy, the allocation of these controls plays a vital role in the system's performance and longevity. The design choices made can allow for tolerance to a range of different control failures. The availability of redundant control effectors allows for an exploration of its ability to tolerate damage on an aircraft, thereby improving its survivability. Furthermore, there is little understanding of a rotorcraft's flight dynamics and transient behavior when damage occurs, and the controls are reconfigured to tolerate such damage. This exploration forms the crux of this dissertation.On a UH-60 Black Hawk, the stabilator can act as a redundant control effector at moderate to high-speed flight conditions. A steady-state trim analysis is performed to demonstrate the feasibility of trimmed flight in various conditions with different locked servo actuator positions for the forward, aft, and lateral actuators. After failure, the controls are reconfigured to partially reallocate the control authority in the longitudinal axis from the main rotor longitudinal cyclic to the stabilator. Flight simulation results demonstrate the ability of this reallocation to compensate for locked-in-place failure of the forward main rotor swashplate servo actuator, as well as the ability of the aircraft to recover safely through a rolling landing maneuver. A similar range of locked positions of main rotor swashplate actuators is demonstrated to be feasible for aircraft recovery using control of the stabilator. So far, stabilator use has been shown to work in an adaptive sense, where the control mixing is remapped in flight once failure is detected. Next, it is shown to perform well when the defined mixing utilizes the stabilator even on the undamaged aircraft, removing the need to detect and identify specific failures on the aircraft. Further investigation considered the benefit of allowing for more or less longitudinal authority to be given to the stabilator in different flight conditions in the context of handling qualities ratings for the aircraft in pitch attitude and vertical rate response. Stabilator hardover failure is also examined. This work is then extended onto the compound helicopter platform. A reconfigurable control allocation method is applied on a compound helicopter in order to utilize the redundant control effectors in the feedback loop to compensate for locked-in-place actuator failures. A range of tolerable positions for locked-in-place actuator failures is established for the aircraft at a cruise speed of 150 knots. A full authority model following linear dynamic inversion control architecture is implemented for the nonlinear simulation model. It is shown to successfully compensate for actuator failures when the feedback control and the pseudoinverse control allocation method redistributes the control authority to the working actuators, assuming fault detection has taken place. Finally, a comparison of the robustness of a baseline pseudoinverse control allocation to an adaptive redistributed pseudoinverse method when the aircraft is subjected to different actuator failure at their extreme positions is examined. This is carried out through handling qualities based assessment and dynamic nonlinear flight simulations.
    번역하기

    Aircraft survivability in the event of component failure or some loss of control effectiveness is a critical area of research, particularly with regards to the control system design. While this has been thoroughly researched for fixed-wing aircraft s...

    Aircraft survivability in the event of component failure or some loss of control effectiveness is a critical area of research, particularly with regards to the control system design. While this has been thoroughly researched for fixed-wing aircraft since the 1980s, there has been a lack of a similar body of work for rotorcraft. This lack is mainly due to the absence of control redundancy on a conventional single main rotor helicopter. A fully compounded helicopter bridges this gap by adding fixed-wing control surfaces (flaps, ailerons, stabilator, and rudder) and compound-specific auxiliary controls (propeller thrust and main rotor speed). When the platform of interest possesses a significant amount of control redundancy, the allocation of these controls plays a vital role in the system's performance and longevity. The design choices made can allow for tolerance to a range of different control failures. The availability of redundant control effectors allows for an exploration of its ability to tolerate damage on an aircraft, thereby improving its survivability. Furthermore, there is little understanding of a rotorcraft's flight dynamics and transient behavior when damage occurs, and the controls are reconfigured to tolerate such damage. This exploration forms the crux of this dissertation.On a UH-60 Black Hawk, the stabilator can act as a redundant control effector at moderate to high-speed flight conditions. A steady-state trim analysis is performed to demonstrate the feasibility of trimmed flight in various conditions with different locked servo actuator positions for the forward, aft, and lateral actuators. After failure, the controls are reconfigured to partially reallocate the control authority in the longitudinal axis from the main rotor longitudinal cyclic to the stabilator. Flight simulation results demonstrate the ability of this reallocation to compensate for locked-in-place failure of the forward main rotor swashplate servo actuator, as well as the ability of the aircraft to recover safely through a rolling landing maneuver. A similar range of locked positions of main rotor swashplate actuators is demonstrated to be feasible for aircraft recovery using control of the stabilator. So far, stabilator use has been shown to work in an adaptive sense, where the control mixing is remapped in flight once failure is detected. Next, it is shown to perform well when the defined mixing utilizes the stabilator even on the undamaged aircraft, removing the need to detect and identify specific failures on the aircraft. Further investigation considered the benefit of allowing for more or less longitudinal authority to be given to the stabilator in different flight conditions in the context of handling qualities ratings for the aircraft in pitch attitude and vertical rate response. Stabilator hardover failure is also examined. This work is then extended onto the compound helicopter platform. A reconfigurable control allocation method is applied on a compound helicopter in order to utilize the redundant control effectors in the feedback loop to compensate for locked-in-place actuator failures. A range of tolerable positions for locked-in-place actuator failures is established for the aircraft at a cruise speed of 150 knots. A full authority model following linear dynamic inversion control architecture is implemented for the nonlinear simulation model. It is shown to successfully compensate for actuator failures when the feedback control and the pseudoinverse control allocation method redistributes the control authority to the working actuators, assuming fault detection has taken place. Finally, a comparison of the robustness of a baseline pseudoinverse control allocation to an adaptive redistributed pseudoinverse method when the aircraft is subjected to different actuator failure at their extreme positions is examined. This is carried out through handling qualities based assessment and dynamic nonlinear flight simulations.

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼