중국의 노동쟁의 현황 및 처리제도에 관한 연구 = A Study on the Current Situation and Resolution System of Labor Dispute in China

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

In 1978, Chinese reform and opening caused a big changes in Chinese labor relationship. Through reforming and opening, China gave up part of state ownership system and group ownership system, permitted private ownership system, and also opened the way for capitalists to ride again. Since China was established, the labor relationship ceased for 30 years has been appeared. However because the top priority aim of China's reform was economic growth, the protection of the rights and interests of labor was pushed back on the policy priority list. China takes foreign capitals based on cheap labor force quickly and China come up the worldwide plants. Since reformed, China keeps an economic growth rate of 9.7% annually for 30years. This economic growth is based on labor's sacrifice. However, Chinese fast economic growth causes side effects such as increasement of the gap between the wealthy and the poor, increasement of unbalanced development between regions, and the increasement of conflict between labor and management. Especially, according to changes in labors' level of consciousness, the labors recognized that their rights and interests are exploited by employers. Therefore, the labor dispute is continuously increasing.
Chinese government changes their policy from the policy focusing on enterprise development to the policy protecting labor's rights and interests. In order to protect labor's rights and interests, China conducts labor contract law and labor dispute conciliation arbitration law in 2008. This kind of changes in Chinese labor environment affect a lot to Korean companies which already entered into China or are willing to enter. According to studying on present situation and resolution system in Chinese labor dispute, this paper suggests the proper countermeasure related to labor dispute of Korean companies which entered in China.
First, the success rate of labor dispute conciliation by enterprise labor dispute conciliation committee is around 20% during recent several years and the success rate by year is in decline. Therefore, when labor dispute is occurred, our companies which entered into China better use other labor dispute methods such as negotiation and arbitration than conciliation in order to settle a conflict.
Second, from the Korean enterprises entered in China point of view, there exists a problem not to sue except special cases which provided in the law even though they are dissatisfied with arbitrate judgment. Thus, when labor dispute occurred, Korean enterprises try to do best to settle the dispute through negotiation. However, in case of that the dispute cannot be settled by negotiation, they have to attend in the arbitration as if it is a last chance.
Third, Korean enterprises keep in mind that dispute handling procedures between labor union and users or between labor group and users are different, and then deal with separately. Thus, dispute between labor and users have to follow arbitrate procedures as a necessary procedure, but in case of dispute related to group contract, namely dispute against labor union, labor dispute can be settled by arbitrate or suit, so after figuring out the situation exactly, it is necessary to se-lect more advantageous way in order to settle the dispute. Moreover, in case of the dispute between labor union, they have to keep in mind that conciliation procedures cannot be used.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 王璣, "勞動爭議調解仲裁法中一裁終局制度存在的缺失與完善" 27 (27): 2010

2 郭常元, "勞動爭議處理程序法的現代化" 中國方正出版社 2004

3 鄭常元, "勞動爭議處理程序法的現代化" 中國方正出版社 2004

4 丁寰翔, "勞動爭議處理程序存在的問題及解決" 143 : 2010

5 孫德强, "勞動爭議處理法制30年發展與展望" 2009

6 姜潁, "勞動爭議處理敎程" 法律出版社 2003

7 鐘三宇, "勞動爭議糾紛解決機制硏究-兼論我國勞動爭議調解仲裁法的制度完善" 2010

8 中華全國總工會法律工作部, "勞動爭議及其處理程序槪論" 中國國際廣播出版社 1992

9 董保華, "勞動法論" 世界圖書出版社 1999

10 蔣月, "勞動法與社會保障法" 浙江大學出版社 2010

11 賈俊玲, "勞動法學" 中國廣播視大學出版社 399-, 2003

12 王全興, "勞動法" 法律出版社 1997

13 孫智峰, "勞動合同法風險豫防與糾紛應對" 法律出版社 2009

14 정상원, "중국노동법" 삼성경제연구소 2008

15 박진철, "중국 노동분쟁해결제도" 부산대학교 47 (47): 2006

16 정은희, "중국 국유기업 개혁의 경제사적 고찰" 한국전문경영인학회 10 (10): 197-231, 2007

17 목영준, "상사중재법론" 박영사 2001

18 정승규, "노동분쟁해결절차에 관한 국가간 비교분석-한국과 중국의 노동쟁의처리제도를 중심으로-" 청주대학교 법학연구소 31 (31): 2009

19 曹可安, "集體勞動爭議明顯上昇的原因及應對" 2010

20 楊芳霞, "論集體勞動爭議處理的法律機制" 2009

21 董保華, "論我國勞動爭議處理立法的基本定位" 2 : 2008

22 樊長遠, "論我國勞動爭議處理制度的改革" 3 : 2008

23 王敏, "當前勞動爭議處理體制機制問題思考" 4 : 2010

24 卞小燕, "淺析勞動爭議調解仲裁法的若干條款" 2010

25 江平, "新編公司法敎程" 法律出版社 2003

26 石先廣, "新法下的企業勞動爭議風險豫防與應對" 法律出版社 2008

27 王揮, "我國勞動爭議調解制度價値評析及制度重構" 2 : 2008

28 張秋惠, "我國勞動爭議案件數量增長問題硏究" 3 : 2010

29 黃良軍, "對勞動爭議效率的思考" 10 : 2003

30 吳興榮, "對現行勞動爭議處理制的思考及建議" 2 : 2006

31 曹鸞驍, "對我國勞動爭議仲裁制度的否定性評價-兼論勞動爭議調解仲裁法違憲" 1 : 2010

32 張世誠, "完善勞動爭議處理制度促進勞動關係和諧穩定" 2008

33 勞動和社會保障部, "全國勞動和社會保障幹部培訓敎材-勞動關係" 中國勞動社會保障出版社 2001

34 楊榮新, "仲裁法理論與活用" 中國經濟出版社 1998

35 孫德强, "中國勞動爭議處理制度硏究" 中國法制出版社 2005

36 葉靑, "中國仲裁制度硏究" 上海社會科學院出版社 2009

37 김용길, "中國 勞動爭議의 仲裁에 관한 考察" 한국중재학회 19 (19): 127-153, 2009