기후위기 대응을 위한 메타거버넌스 체계 분석 : 충북지역의 환경거번너스 사례를 중심으로 = Analysis of Meta-Governance System for Climate Crisis Response : Environmental Governance Cases in Chungbuk Region

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Research groups in the field of urban environmental issues and crisis management have focused their attention on two major challenges. The former tries to find effective responses to the climate crisis, and the latter stresses appropriate ways geared towards environmental governance. In short, responding to the climate crisis implies the ends, and the development of environmental governance examines the means. The temporal scope of the study covers from 1995 to 2023, the last 30 years. This period can be said to be the period when environmental governance in local communities has been in full swing. The spatial scope spans Chungcheongbuk-do and related watersheds. The key contents deal with representative environmental governance cases in the Chungbuk and its neighboring region. Among 280 environmental cases, 14 representative environmental governance cases are selected through screening, categorization, and integration processes. The research methodology basically involves five steps: firstly, standardization of environmental governance cases; secondly, establishment of analysis factors and attributing classification; thirdly, comparative * A thesis for the degree of Doctor in February 2024. analyses and implications; fourthly, development of environmental governance evaluation indicators; fifthly, surveying experts and verifying implications, sixthly, setting the direction of environmental governance development and meta-governance construction, and seventhly, presenting couples of meta-governance models for climate crisis response. Concerned with research findings, this study derives seven principles and directions for building meta-governance in response to the climate crisis. First of all, there must be a societal consensus or commitment on the need to build meta-governance. Here, meta-governance functions as powerful tools for mobilizing broad participation and cooperation to address the climate crisis. Secondly, it is necessary to build consensus on the principles of win-win and cooperation. This study emphasizes the fact that major stakeholders should do their best for the proposed inclusive community that respects and considers different perspectives, viewpoints, interests, and political views. Thirdly, the meta-governance system should encompass the functions of policy consultation and action cooperation. Policy councils and action networks involving various units can be organized by sector, issue, and region. Fourthly, this study urges establishing action cooperation business platforms to lead the carbon-neutral citizen action movement. It should present joint action plans and common processes, link sectoral action activities with comprehensive action activities, and establish a virtuous cycle business structure to increase activity. Fifthly, this study examines alternative ways to organize, broaden and deepen the participation of a wide range of citizens and various social groups. Appropriate incentives can be provided to villages, schools, churches, civic organizations, and others, and voluntary actions can be encouraged according to the conditions and characteristics of the participating organizations. The final task is given to integrating them into the decision-making process of the meta-governance system. Sixthly, this study proposes that an efficient and rational governance system should be organized. It should be civil society-led and supported by the executive branch. In addition, it should have basic staffing and budgeting, and be able to share information and make resources available. Seventhly, institutionalization measures such as the enactment of relevant ordinances should be prepared for the stable operation of meta-governance. Finally, in terms of case application, this study presents a series of meta-governance construction plans that can be applied to the Chungbuk region along with policy environment analyses based on the TOWS principles. For the future plans and actions, this study urges concrete ways to build meta-governance as practical alternatives in responding to the climate crisis. In the future, it expects that detailed studies and discussions on building regional, sectoral, and issue-specific governance are required. It is also necessary to support the establishment of meta-governance at the national level through case studies of environmental governance across the country. Keywords: climate crisis, climate crisis response, environmental governance, meta-governance, cooperation system, implementation plan

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 제1장 서론 1
• 제1절 연구의 배경 및 필요성 1
• (1) 연구의 배경 1
• (2) 연구의 필요성 3
• 제2절 연구 목적 4
• 제3절 연구의 범위와 방법 5
• (1) 연구의 범위 5
• (2) 연구의 방법 5
• 제2장 이론적 고찰 8
• 제1절 환경과 기후위기 8
• (1) 환경과 지속가능발전 8
• (2) 기후변화와 기후위기 11
• (3) 탄소중립과 녹색전환 16
• 제2절 메타거버넌스 23
• (1) 협력적 거버넌스 23
• (2) 환경거버넌스 31
• (3) 메타거버넌스 39
• 제3절 선행연구 검토 47
• (1) 거버넌스 구성요소 및 성공요인 47
• (2) 메타거버넌스 전략과 도구 51
• 제3장 종합분석 틀 구축 55
• 제1절 분석 개요 55
• 제2절 분석대상 선정방법 56
• (1) 분석대상 선정절차 56
• (2) 충북지역 환경사안 취합 57
• (3) 환경거버넌스 사례 선정 58
• 제3절 분석요소 및 평가지표 설정 60
• (1) 분석요소 설정 60
• (2) 속성구분 63
• (3) 평가지표 설정 67
• 제4절 분석 틀 구축 69
• (1) 분석 틀 개요 69
• (2) 환경거버넌스 사례 표준화 70
• (3) 환경거버넌스 사례 종합분석틀 71
• 제4장 환경거버넌스 분석 79
• 제1절 우리나라 환경거버넌스정책 79
• (1) 환경정책의 변화 과정 78
• (2) 환경법률 제정 및 시행 현황 81
• (3) 환경기본법의 거버넌스 관련 규정 84
• (4) 제도개선 시사점 90
• 제2절 충북지역의 환경운동 분석 95
• (1) 환경운동의 시기 구분 95
• (2) 환경운동의 시기별 특성 99
• (3) 환경운동의 특징과 시사점 113
• 제3절 충북지역 환경거버넌스 분석 114
• (1) 환경정책과 제도 변화 114
• (2) 환경거버넌스 발전과정 121
• (3) 환경거버넌스 특징과 시사점 127
• 제5장 환경거버넌스 사례 비교분석 129
• 제1절 환경거버넌스 사례 129
• (1) 사례 선정 과정 129
• (2) 사례 선정 결과 135
• 제2절 환경거버넌스 운영사례 136
• (1) 청주시지속가능발전협의회 136
• (2) 충청북도지속가능발전협의회 141
• (3) 대청호보전운동본부 145
• (4) 청주시 원흥이생태공원 및 생태문화관 150
• (5) 청주국제에코콤플렉스 155
• (6) 충청북도환경교육센터 160
• (7) 청주새활용시민센터 164
• (8) 비교분석 결과 168
• 제3절 환경거버넌스 활동사례 177
• (1) 문장대용화온천개발 충북도민반대운동 177
• (2) 녹색수도청주만들기 정책협력활동 181
• (3) 충북지역 환경교육활성화 연대협력활동 186
• (4) 미호강유역 물환경개선 상생협력활동 190
• (5) 충북도교육청 초록학교만들기 실천협력활동 195
• (6) 청주지역 쓰레기줄이기 시민실천운동 199
• (7) 충북지역 탄소중립녹색전환 정책협력활동 203
• (8) 비교분석 결과 208
• 제4절 분석결과 검증 및 거버넌스 발전 방향 217
• (1) 환경거버넌스 사례 적합성 검증 217
• (2) 환경거버넌스 관한 시사점 종합 230
• (3) 환경거버넌스 발전 및 메타거버넌스 추진 방향 237
• 제5절 사례응용 : 기후위기 메타거버넌스 구축 방안 243
• (1) 충북지역 정책환경분석 243
• (2) 충북지역 기후위기 대응정책 추진방향 246
• (3) 충북지역 기후위기 대응 메타거버넌스 구축방안 247
• 제6장 결론 253
• 제1절 연구요약 253
• 제2절 정책적 시사점 257
• 참고문헌 259
• 부록 1. 충북지역 환경거버넌스 사례 선정 내역 270
• 부록 2. 환경거버넌스 전문가 설문(인터뷰) 조사 내용 284