RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI우수등재

    양방향 서비스의 주요 특징인 상호작용성(Interactivity)의 이론적 개념화

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76210679

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Despite efforts to discuss about interaction and interactivity, defining those has been neglected. Theoretical conceptualization of the interactivity would provide a basis for studying digital interactive media and communication models. Therefore, this study aims at conceptualizing the interactivity which will be discussed in the debate of communication models.
    There are similar iesearch findings about the increasing feasibilities of media selection and the media attitude of new media users or consumers. For instance, it has been experienced that the videotex systems promised news that was more timely, more thorough and more personal than printed newspapers, but the promises were hollow. This media user would play with this system for a short while and then quit.
    This study deals with the interactivity of interactive media in terms of the technological perspective, as well as in terms of the information exchange. What users do with media content is more important than how content may affect users. The goal of communication is more to exchange information than to persuade users have greater control of the communication technologies.
    The concept of interaction that is a root of interactive media is evolving as far as the types of media are extending. In this paper, operational definitions of interactivity that are developed and applied to empirical studies are searched and discussed, then it is insisted that the further conceptualizing processes are needed. And some guidelines for further studies on it are suggested.
    번역하기

    Despite efforts to discuss about interaction and interactivity, defining those has been neglected. Theoretical conceptualization of the interactivity would provide a basis for studying digital interactive media and communication models. Therefore, thi...

    Despite efforts to discuss about interaction and interactivity, defining those has been neglected. Theoretical conceptualization of the interactivity would provide a basis for studying digital interactive media and communication models. Therefore, this study aims at conceptualizing the interactivity which will be discussed in the debate of communication models.
    There are similar iesearch findings about the increasing feasibilities of media selection and the media attitude of new media users or consumers. For instance, it has been experienced that the videotex systems promised news that was more timely, more thorough and more personal than printed newspapers, but the promises were hollow. This media user would play with this system for a short while and then quit.
    This study deals with the interactivity of interactive media in terms of the technological perspective, as well as in terms of the information exchange. What users do with media content is more important than how content may affect users. The goal of communication is more to exchange information than to persuade users have greater control of the communication technologies.
    The concept of interaction that is a root of interactive media is evolving as far as the types of media are extending. In this paper, operational definitions of interactivity that are developed and applied to empirical studies are searched and discussed, then it is insisted that the further conceptualizing processes are needed. And some guidelines for further studies on it are suggested.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2022 평가 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
    2017-01-01 등재 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2001-07-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1999-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.75 1.75 1.94
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    2.07 2.11 2.773 0.4
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼