미국 증권집단소송의 최근 동향과 우리나라 증권관련집단소송법에 대한 시사점

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

After the financial crisis of the late 1997, the Korean government took a series of structural reform measures to improve the standards of financial system and to enhance the securities market. One major change was to enact the Securities related Class Actions Act that efficiently seeks a relief for collective injuries caused in the course of trading securities and ultimately to enhance the operational transparency of companies in Korea. Even thought this Act was in effective in 2005, the Act appled to some size of companies’ claim for compensation of loss incurred from the first activity after Jan. 2007.
Historically said that securities class action system was made and developed under the American economic circumstance which is the representative model of the formal capitalism. So Korea is the unique country which introduced the securities class action system to its own financial market among the OECD member countries excluding the U.S. and Canada. In that the Korean government should be very serious and studied many aspects of securities class action in order to make the system of the securities class action just fit to the Korean financial market.
This Article is basically to examine the securities class action in the U.S. focused on the Federal Civil Procedure Rule, Private Securities Litigation Reform Act, Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act, Securities Litigation Uniform Standard Act, Sabanes-Oxley Act, and Class Action Fairness Act. Also the Article studies the current trend of securities class action in the U.S. in order to compare it to that in the Korean financial Market. The Article finally tries to suggest the betterment of the Securities Related Class Action Act in Korea.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 머리말
• Ⅱ. 미국의 증권집단소송
• Ⅲ. 우리나라 증권관련 집단소송법
• Ⅳ. 맺음말
• 參考文獻
• 〈Abstract〉

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 고인묵, "증권집단소송제도와 회계인프라의 정비방향"

2 이준섭, "증권집단소송제-무엇이 문제인가: 남소문제와 그 대책" 전국경제인연합회 2004

3 김광록, "증권집단소송의 이론과 실제" 자유기업원 2005

4 이준섭, "증권관련집단소송제의 전제조건으로서의 손해배상책임제도의 정비방안" 2004

5 이세인, "증권관련집단소송제도 운영에 관한 제안 -미국의 입법례 및 소송현황을 중심으로-" 한국기업법학회 19 (19): 379-402, 2005

6 유병현, "증권관련집단소송법 제정안에 대한 검토" 한국상사법학회 20 (20): 2002

7 법원행정처, "증권관련 집단소송규칙 해설"

8 여현호, "증권 집단소송제 도입 미뤄질듯"

9 이정환, "미국의 증권집단소송제도와 우리나라의 증권집단소송법제정에 관한 검토" 은기업지배구조연구소 7 : 2003

10 조성훈, "미국 자본시장규제위원회 (CCMR) 중간보고서 주요내용 및 시사점" 한국증권연구원 2007

11 김광록, "기업의 소송위험에 대한 대응책에 관한 연구" 한국기업법학회 19 (19): 231-260, 2005

12 최준선, "美國의 證券集團訴訟의 現況에 관한 小考" 한국기업법학회 12 : 441-456, 2003

13 David M. Levine, "The Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act of 1998: The Sun Sets on California’s Blue Sky Laws" 54 : 1998

14 Timothy K, Roake, "The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995" Fenwick & West LLP 1996

15 Scott L. Nelson, "The Class Action Fairness Act of 2005: An Analysis" 2005

16 Thomas D. Rowe, Jr., "State and Foreign Class-Action Rules and Statutes: Differences from and Lessons for Federal Rule 23" 35 (35): 2008

17 Rodolfo Batiza, "Sources of the Field Civil Code : The Civil Law Influences on a Common Law Code" 60 : 799-, 1985

18 Sherrie R. Savett, "Securities Class Actions since the 1995 Reform Act : A Plaintiff's Perspective" 13 : 2004

19 Laura E. Simon, "Securities Class Action Settlements : 2010 Review and Analysis" Cornerstone Research 2010

20 Cornerstone Research, "Securities Class Action Cases Filings: 2003, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010 Year in Reviews" 2010

21 Buckberg, Elaine, "Recent Trends in Shareholder Class Action Litigation: Are WorldCom and Enron the New Standard" NERA Economic Consulting 2005

22 Elaine Buckberg, "Recent Trends in Securities Class Action Litigation: 2003 Early Update"

23 Richard M. Phillips, "Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995: Rebalancing Litigation Risks and Rewards for Class Action Plaintiffs, Defendants and Lawyers" 51 : 1009-, 1995

24 Laura E. Simon, "Post-Reform Act Securities Settlements : 2005 Review and Analysis" Cornerstone Research 2005

25 Laura E. Simon, "Post-Reform Act Securities Lawsuits : Settlements Reported Through December 2003" Cornerstone Research 2003

26 Edward M. Spiro, "New Amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure" 230 (230): 2003

27 James D. Cox, "Making Securities Fraud Class Action Virtuous" 39 : 497-, 1997

28 Roy L. Brooks, "Legal lines : Civil Procedure" Harcourt Brace Legal and Professional Publications, Inc 1993

29 John Shad, "Introduction to Securities Class Actions: Abuses and Remedies" 1996

30 Christopher A. Kitchen, "Interlocutory Appeal of Class Action Certification Decisions Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(f): A Proposal for a New Guideline" 2004 : 231-, 2004

31 CCMR, "Interim Report of the Committee on Capital Markets Regulation" U.S. Committee on Capital Markets Regulation 2006

32 Michale A. Perino, "Fraud and Federalism: Preempting Private State Securities Fraud Causes of Action" 50 : 273-, 1998

33 Elizabeth J. Goldstein, "Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23: A Need for Technical Innovation" 104 : 653-, 2000

34 Deborah R. Hensler, "Class Action Dilemmas : Pursuing Public Goals for Private Gain, Executive Summary" Rand Institute for Civil Justice 1999

35 Brain W. Smith, "Avoiding Securities Class Actions Arising from Y2K Issues" MCB University Press 7 (7): 1999

36 Michael A. Perino, "A Census of Securities Class Action Litigation After the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995"