RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    소득과세의 공평성 평가와 합리적 증세방안에 대한 연구 = A Study on the Evaluation of Income Taxation Fairness and Rational Methods for Tax Increase

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104293452

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The current administration is exerting itself to secure financial resource in order to realize its welfare pledge. Accordingly, this study has reviewed the tax burden ratio among OECD members to suggest the grounds for the argument on tax increase and has evaluated the fairness of taxation for the suggestion of rational methods for tax increase with the focus on income taxation (Income tax and Corporate tax). We use National Tax Service annual statistics to analyze the equity of taxation. The plan of tax increase will be decided by comparison with the tax burden ratio among OECD countries. We analyze the effect of tax increase in view of income taxation. The increase of tax burden ratio in Korea needs an approach from the long-term viewpoint and its sharp increase is not desirable since the tax payers feel a relatively much tax burden if the increase should be higher than the rate of economic growth. A method of distribution able to make both income tax and corporate tax considering the burden of tax increase is desirable to distribute proportionally the tax burden ratio by the ratio of the two over domestic taxes. With the increase of 1%p of the tax burden ratio, there should be 5,881 billion won increase of income tax and 5,852 billion won increase of corporate tax.
    In case of adjusting the section of assessment standard of general income tax, the result of tax revenue income is about 343.4 billion won and in case of adjusting only the tax rate of high income earners it will be around 908 billion won. If both of the two are adjusted, it will be 6,794.6 billion won. Realistically, when there is 10% of reduction at tax deduction and exemption, the tax revenue to be secured will amount to 166.8 billion won. The best method for increasing in income tax is to adjust both assessment standard and tax rate.
    When there is a raise of corporate tax rate in the method of practicing the increase of corporate tax, the increase of tax revenue will be 7,492.2 billion won and when both section of assessment standard and tax rate are adjusted there will be the 6,158.5 billion won increase of corporate tax. 10% reduction of tax exemption will result in securing the tax revenue of 740.1 billion won. If there is 10% reduction of non-taxable income, the effect of tax revenue increase (in case of applying 22% of tax rate) is relatively low with 6 billion won. It is indispensible to adjust the section of assessment standard and tax rate for the method of increasing corporate tax, and the tax deduction and cut of non-taxation can be utilized for simultaneous approach. This study can play the role of fundamental data in the future when it will be necessary to improve the assessment standard of income tax and corporate tax, and the taxation system. In particular, the effect of tax increase can be utilized in the future by suggesting methods of tax revenue increase and assuming their effect.
    번역하기

    The current administration is exerting itself to secure financial resource in order to realize its welfare pledge. Accordingly, this study has reviewed the tax burden ratio among OECD members to suggest the grounds for the argument on tax increase and...

    The current administration is exerting itself to secure financial resource in order to realize its welfare pledge. Accordingly, this study has reviewed the tax burden ratio among OECD members to suggest the grounds for the argument on tax increase and has evaluated the fairness of taxation for the suggestion of rational methods for tax increase with the focus on income taxation (Income tax and Corporate tax). We use National Tax Service annual statistics to analyze the equity of taxation. The plan of tax increase will be decided by comparison with the tax burden ratio among OECD countries. We analyze the effect of tax increase in view of income taxation. The increase of tax burden ratio in Korea needs an approach from the long-term viewpoint and its sharp increase is not desirable since the tax payers feel a relatively much tax burden if the increase should be higher than the rate of economic growth. A method of distribution able to make both income tax and corporate tax considering the burden of tax increase is desirable to distribute proportionally the tax burden ratio by the ratio of the two over domestic taxes. With the increase of 1%p of the tax burden ratio, there should be 5,881 billion won increase of income tax and 5,852 billion won increase of corporate tax.
    In case of adjusting the section of assessment standard of general income tax, the result of tax revenue income is about 343.4 billion won and in case of adjusting only the tax rate of high income earners it will be around 908 billion won. If both of the two are adjusted, it will be 6,794.6 billion won. Realistically, when there is 10% of reduction at tax deduction and exemption, the tax revenue to be secured will amount to 166.8 billion won. The best method for increasing in income tax is to adjust both assessment standard and tax rate.
    When there is a raise of corporate tax rate in the method of practicing the increase of corporate tax, the increase of tax revenue will be 7,492.2 billion won and when both section of assessment standard and tax rate are adjusted there will be the 6,158.5 billion won increase of corporate tax. 10% reduction of tax exemption will result in securing the tax revenue of 740.1 billion won. If there is 10% reduction of non-taxable income, the effect of tax revenue increase (in case of applying 22% of tax rate) is relatively low with 6 billion won. It is indispensible to adjust the section of assessment standard and tax rate for the method of increasing corporate tax, and the tax deduction and cut of non-taxation can be utilized for simultaneous approach. This study can play the role of fundamental data in the future when it will be necessary to improve the assessment standard of income tax and corporate tax, and the taxation system. In particular, the effect of tax increase can be utilized in the future by suggesting methods of tax revenue increase and assuming their effect.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 김광윤, "합리적인 조세부과와 조세의 공평성을 달성하기 위한 연구" 미래한국재단 2012

    2 박춘래, "최저한세제도의 과세공평성 향상분석" (19) : 275-297, 1994

    3 전규안, "조세부담의 공평성 분석" 11 : 7-41, 1998

    4 고종권, "세율인하와 세법변경에 따른 과세공평성의 분석" 14 : 109-139, 1999

    5 허준수, "새 정부에 바라는 복지정책의 방향" (사)선진복지사회연구회 9-38, 2013

    6 최원석, "법인조세부담의 수평적 공평성 측정에 대한 재검토" 한국세무학회 26 (26): 137-168, 2009

    7 국세청, "국세통계연보"

    8 심충진, "공평과세 측면에서의 평가와 개선방안" 2012

    9 한국은행, "경제통계시스템"

    10 Westort, P. J., "Toward a Better Measure of Horizontal Equity" 24 : 17-28, 2002

    1 김광윤, "합리적인 조세부과와 조세의 공평성을 달성하기 위한 연구" 미래한국재단 2012

    2 박춘래, "최저한세제도의 과세공평성 향상분석" (19) : 275-297, 1994

    3 전규안, "조세부담의 공평성 분석" 11 : 7-41, 1998

    4 고종권, "세율인하와 세법변경에 따른 과세공평성의 분석" 14 : 109-139, 1999

    5 허준수, "새 정부에 바라는 복지정책의 방향" (사)선진복지사회연구회 9-38, 2013

    6 최원석, "법인조세부담의 수평적 공평성 측정에 대한 재검토" 한국세무학회 26 (26): 137-168, 2009

    7 국세청, "국세통계연보"

    8 심충진, "공평과세 측면에서의 평가와 개선방안" 2012

    9 한국은행, "경제통계시스템"

    10 Westort, P. J., "Toward a Better Measure of Horizontal Equity" 24 : 17-28, 2002

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2004-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.23 1.23 1.14
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.29 1.2 2.08 0.23
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼