RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      Characteristics and restrictiveness of rules of origin in the Korea-Australia FTA : an empirical analysis

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T14436473

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Rules of origin (RoO) are necessary and important in free trade agreements
      (FTAs), given the fact that their function is to prevent trade deflection. However,
      with the proliferation of FTAs over the last two decades, diverse RoO among the
      different FTAs have resulted in increases in the cost of complying with the
      complex requirement of RoO. In other words, RoO can play a role as trade
      barriers. Thus, it is critical to find out how demanding RoO are, in order not to
      limit exporters’ opportunities for more markets.
      On this ground, this paper analyzed the restrictiveness of RoO, which can be
      hidden protection, with the example of the bilateral FTA between Korea and
      Australia, using a method proposed by Estevadeordal (2000). It revealed that the
      restrictiveness index of the Korea-Australia FTA is 4.26, lower than those of the
      Korea-China FTA (4.43), the Korea-EFTA FTA (4.53), the Korea-ASEAN FTA
      (4.59), and the Korea-Chile FTA (4.82). This low restrictiveness index of the
      Korea-Australia FTA can be explained mainly by the complementary industrial
      and trade structure and significant amount of trade volume between the two
      countries. Then, examining restrictiveness of RoO for nineteen sectors, it is found
      that the agricultural and animal sector is the most restrictive among all the sectors,
      whereas the chemical and electrical equipment sectors are less restrictive. In
      addition, the analysis has shown that the restrictiveness of RoO in major five
      sectors in the Korea-Australia FTA lies between those of the China-Australia FTA
      and the Japan-Australia FTA.
      Given the results of this research, even though RoO in the Korea-Australia
      FTA are less restrictive than those of Korea’s other FTAs, Korea should adopt a
      more strategic approach to trade policy, considering the restrictiveness of RoO
      and Korea’s position in the Australian market vis-à-vis China and Japan.
      Furthermore, the Korean government needs to review these factors for
      renegotiation of the Korea-Australia FTA in the future.
      번역하기

      Rules of origin (RoO) are necessary and important in free trade agreements (FTAs), given the fact that their function is to prevent trade deflection. However, with the proliferation of FTAs over the last two decades, diverse RoO among the different FT...

      Rules of origin (RoO) are necessary and important in free trade agreements
      (FTAs), given the fact that their function is to prevent trade deflection. However,
      with the proliferation of FTAs over the last two decades, diverse RoO among the
      different FTAs have resulted in increases in the cost of complying with the
      complex requirement of RoO. In other words, RoO can play a role as trade
      barriers. Thus, it is critical to find out how demanding RoO are, in order not to
      limit exporters’ opportunities for more markets.
      On this ground, this paper analyzed the restrictiveness of RoO, which can be
      hidden protection, with the example of the bilateral FTA between Korea and
      Australia, using a method proposed by Estevadeordal (2000). It revealed that the
      restrictiveness index of the Korea-Australia FTA is 4.26, lower than those of the
      Korea-China FTA (4.43), the Korea-EFTA FTA (4.53), the Korea-ASEAN FTA
      (4.59), and the Korea-Chile FTA (4.82). This low restrictiveness index of the
      Korea-Australia FTA can be explained mainly by the complementary industrial
      and trade structure and significant amount of trade volume between the two
      countries. Then, examining restrictiveness of RoO for nineteen sectors, it is found
      that the agricultural and animal sector is the most restrictive among all the sectors,
      whereas the chemical and electrical equipment sectors are less restrictive. In
      addition, the analysis has shown that the restrictiveness of RoO in major five
      sectors in the Korea-Australia FTA lies between those of the China-Australia FTA
      and the Japan-Australia FTA.
      Given the results of this research, even though RoO in the Korea-Australia
      FTA are less restrictive than those of Korea’s other FTAs, Korea should adopt a
      more strategic approach to trade policy, considering the restrictiveness of RoO
      and Korea’s position in the Australian market vis-à-vis China and Japan.
      Furthermore, the Korean government needs to review these factors for
      renegotiation of the Korea-Australia FTA in the future.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • I. Introduction ...........................................................................................1
      • II. Theoretical Background & Literature Review......................................5
      • 2.1 Literature Review .....................................................................5
      • 2.2 Rules of Origin ..........................................................................9
      • 2.3 Origin Determination Criteria ..................................................10
      • I. Introduction ...........................................................................................1
      • II. Theoretical Background & Literature Review......................................5
      • 2.1 Literature Review .....................................................................5
      • 2.2 Rules of Origin ..........................................................................9
      • 2.3 Origin Determination Criteria ..................................................10
      • 2.4 Restrictiveness Index ..............................................................14
      • III. Characteristics of Rules of Origin in the Korea-Australia FTA .........19
      • 3.1 Wholly-Obtained Criterion and Regional Value Content based on Build-down and Build-up Methods .....................................19
      • 3.2 De Minimis ..............................................................................21
      • 3.3 Cumulation and Outward Processing Zone..............................22
      • IV. Analysis of Restrictiveness of Rules of Origin in the Korea-Australia
      • FTA .....................................................................................................24
      • 4.1 Trade Structure between Korea and Australia............................24
      • 4.2 Restrictiveness Index of Rules of Origin in the Korea-Australia FTA.............................................................................................29
      • 4.3 Sectoral Restrictiveness Index of Rules of Origin in the Korea-Australia FTA .............................................................................32
      • 4.4 Different Categories of Rules of Origin in the Korea-Australia FTA.............................................................................................37
      • 4.5 Comparative Analysis of Rules of Origin in the FTA by Korea, China, and Japan with Australia ................................................. 39
      • V. Conclusion...........................................................................................44
      • Appendices.............................................................................................................47
      • References..............................................................................................................50
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼