憲法裁判所制度에 對한 考察 : 特性 및 問題點을 中心으로 = A study on Constitutional justice system with emphasis on special quality and question

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This thesis inquire to a study on constitutional justice system with protection of constitution.
This constitutional justice system is cause not the product of theoretical speculation, but from violation of the constitution on the judge review of legislation, and one the hand, protect in a basis claim of a people.
According to this thesis, the organization of the thesis is described in the following list.
Chapter Ⅰ. Introduction
1. Purpose of this thesis study.
Chapter Ⅱ. A general idea of constitutional justice system.
1. A meaning of constitutional review system.
2. A boundary of constitutional review system.
Chapter Ⅲ. The constitutional justice system of a every country.
This every countries is America, Japanes, Philippine, with the administration of justice, and Austria, west Germany, Italy, Egypt, Jugo-slavia is organization with the Constitutional justice system.
ChapterⅣ. The constitutional justice system of our country.
This constitutional justice system is organization from the first Republic in Korea to the sixth Republic in Korea, with a three type of the constitution committee, the Administration of justice, and the constitutional justice system.
ChapterⅤ. According to the character and a problem of the onstitutional justice system.
More than, the constitutional justice system is look after the personal protection, and the constitution protection.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• ABSTRACT
• Ⅰ. 序 論
• 1. 硏究의 範圍 및 目的
• Ⅱ. 憲法裁判制度의 槪念
• 1. 憲法裁判制度의 意義
• 2. 憲法裁判의 限界
• Ⅲ. 各國에 있어서 憲法裁判制度
• 1. 美國의 司法審査制度
• 2. 日本의 司法審査制度
• 3. 필리핀의 司法審査制度
• 4. 西獨의 憲法裁判所 制度
• 5. 오스트리아의 憲法裁判所制度
• 6. 이타리아의 憲法裁判所制度
• 7. 터어키의 憲法裁判所制度
• Ⅳ. 憲法裁判所制度를 否認하는 나라의 例
• 1. 英國의 例
• 2. 소련의 例
• Ⅴ. 우리나라의 憲法裁判所制度
• 1. 憲法裁判所制度의 沿革
• 2. 憲法裁判所制度의 變遷
• Ⅵ. 憲法裁判所制度의 類型에 다른 特性 및 問題点
• 1. 憲法委員會의 特性 및 問題点
• 2. 司法審査制의 特性 및 問題点
• 3. 憲法裁判所의 特性 및 問題点
• Ⅶ. 結 論
• 參考文獻