RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      표준전자식 혈압계와 수은혈압계, 전자혈압계의 비교 선행연구 = Comparison of Sphygmomanometer, Fully Automatic Electronic Blood Pressure Meters with Standard Digital Blood Pressure Monitor : Pilot Study

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101119566

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Devices to measure the blood pressure of patients are being used without any calibration in a hospital. It is an important to show consistent values when any medical devices measure the same patients regardless they are sphygmomanometer or fully automatic electronic blood pressure meter. We compared sphygmomanometer and fully automatic electronic blood pressure meters with standard digital blood pressure monitor (SDBPM) to evaluate the consistency of the small healthy subjects. We measured the blood pressure from six healthy subjects (three of 20~40 years and three of 40~60 years old). Two sphygmomanometer and two fully automatic electronic blood pressure meters were used and compared with the SDBPM. Blood pressures measured from right and left arms each and were compared. All six healthy subjects showed normal blood pressure values. In general, left blood pressure values showed higher values than right side. Comparing SDBPM, with the other monitors, the systolic pressure showed ${\pm}$ 34.8% difference and ${\pm}$ 33.3% for the diastolic pressure. Correlation between SDBPM and Sphygmomanometer was 0.59~0.71, and 0.50~0.70 for fully automated digital BP monitors. It fell in grade-D when we apply the BHS(British hypertension society). AAMI(American association for the advancement of medical instrumentation) also showed unsatisfactory results for the mean value (${\leq}$ 5 mmHg) and standard deviation (${\leq}$ 8 mmHg). We tested sphygmomanometer and fully automatic electronic blood pressure meters and compared with a standard digital blood pressure monitor. All devices showed inconsistent blood pressures. A reliable calibration system is highly needed for all devices in all hospitals.
      번역하기

      Devices to measure the blood pressure of patients are being used without any calibration in a hospital. It is an important to show consistent values when any medical devices measure the same patients regardless they are sphygmomanometer or fully autom...

      Devices to measure the blood pressure of patients are being used without any calibration in a hospital. It is an important to show consistent values when any medical devices measure the same patients regardless they are sphygmomanometer or fully automatic electronic blood pressure meter. We compared sphygmomanometer and fully automatic electronic blood pressure meters with standard digital blood pressure monitor (SDBPM) to evaluate the consistency of the small healthy subjects. We measured the blood pressure from six healthy subjects (three of 20~40 years and three of 40~60 years old). Two sphygmomanometer and two fully automatic electronic blood pressure meters were used and compared with the SDBPM. Blood pressures measured from right and left arms each and were compared. All six healthy subjects showed normal blood pressure values. In general, left blood pressure values showed higher values than right side. Comparing SDBPM, with the other monitors, the systolic pressure showed ${\pm}$ 34.8% difference and ${\pm}$ 33.3% for the diastolic pressure. Correlation between SDBPM and Sphygmomanometer was 0.59~0.71, and 0.50~0.70 for fully automated digital BP monitors. It fell in grade-D when we apply the BHS(British hypertension society). AAMI(American association for the advancement of medical instrumentation) also showed unsatisfactory results for the mean value (${\leq}$ 5 mmHg) and standard deviation (${\leq}$ 8 mmHg). We tested sphygmomanometer and fully automatic electronic blood pressure meters and compared with a standard digital blood pressure monitor. All devices showed inconsistent blood pressures. A reliable calibration system is highly needed for all devices in all hospitals.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 이종국, "오므론 HEM 907 XL 자동 진동식 혈압계와 수동 수은혈압계의 오차에 미치는 연령의 영향" 대한고혈압학회 17 (17): 114-124, 2011

      2 T. G. Pickering, "What will replace the mercury sphygmomanometer?" 8 : 23-25, 2003

      3 L. A. Taylor, "The application of signal averaging to the NIBP oscillometricwaveform" 1 : 691-692, 1995

      4 E. O'Brien, "Replacing the mercury sphygmomanometer : Requres clinicians to demend better automated devices" 320 : 815-816, 2000

      5 C. T. Lin, "Reduction of interference in oscillometric arteiral blood pressure measurement using fuzzy logic" 50 (50): 432-441, 2003

      6 K. Kang, "Medical Instrumentation Engineering" Yeomungak 395-449, 2012

      7 J. N. Choo, "Clinical Evaluation of the Accuracy of Electronic Home Blood Pressure Measuring Devices" 9 (9): 101-112, 2002

      8 C. Huo, "Blood pressure measurement based on wavelet analysis and fuzzy inference method" 1 : 4382-4386, 2006

      9 American association for the advancement of medical instrumentation, "American national standard for electronic or automated sphygmomanometers" 1987

      10 C. G. Son, "2009 patient survey In-depth Analysis" Ministry of Health and Welfare 2011

      1 이종국, "오므론 HEM 907 XL 자동 진동식 혈압계와 수동 수은혈압계의 오차에 미치는 연령의 영향" 대한고혈압학회 17 (17): 114-124, 2011

      2 T. G. Pickering, "What will replace the mercury sphygmomanometer?" 8 : 23-25, 2003

      3 L. A. Taylor, "The application of signal averaging to the NIBP oscillometricwaveform" 1 : 691-692, 1995

      4 E. O'Brien, "Replacing the mercury sphygmomanometer : Requres clinicians to demend better automated devices" 320 : 815-816, 2000

      5 C. T. Lin, "Reduction of interference in oscillometric arteiral blood pressure measurement using fuzzy logic" 50 (50): 432-441, 2003

      6 K. Kang, "Medical Instrumentation Engineering" Yeomungak 395-449, 2012

      7 J. N. Choo, "Clinical Evaluation of the Accuracy of Electronic Home Blood Pressure Measuring Devices" 9 (9): 101-112, 2002

      8 C. Huo, "Blood pressure measurement based on wavelet analysis and fuzzy inference method" 1 : 4382-4386, 2006

      9 American association for the advancement of medical instrumentation, "American national standard for electronic or automated sphygmomanometers" 1987

      10 C. G. Son, "2009 patient survey In-depth Analysis" Ministry of Health and Welfare 2011

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2017-12-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2013-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-10-06 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Joural of Biomedical Engineering Research KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      1999-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.08 0.08 0.12
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.11 0.09 0.307 0.04
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼