RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      고등교육 관점에서 본 의학교육의 질 결정 요인: 중요도-준비도 분석(IPA) = Determinants of Medical Education Quality from a Higher Education Perspective: An Importance–Preparedness Analysis (IPA)

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A110279181

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This study aims to explore the factors that enhance the quality of medicaleducation from a higher education perspective. By reconceptualizing the"Performance" variable in the traditional Importance-Performance Analysis (IPA)as "Preparedness" for diagnosing future-response capabilities, this researchanalyzes the perceived importance of each factor and the actual level ofreadiness within medical schools as reported by faculty members. To achievethis, a survey was conducted with 33 medical education faculty members acrossSouth Korea. The data were analyzed using Importance-Preparedness Analysis(IPA) alongside Borich Needs Analysis and the Locus for Focus model.
      The results showed that the perceived importance of all items wassignificantly higher than the actual level of preparedness, indicating a highawareness of the need to improve medical education quality despite relativelyinsufficient readiness in practice. Specifically, there was a high demand forimprovement in pedagogical elements such as activating professor-studentinteraction, developing future competencies, and supporting faculty professionaldevelopment. Conversely, traditional educational areas—such as clinical practiceand the appropriateness of assessment implementation—showed a relativelystable level of preparedness. These trends were further validated through theBorich Needs and Locus for Focus analyses.
      The findings suggest that to enhance the quality of medical education, it is necessary to maintain the existing clinical-centered system while implementingstrategic improvements and institutional support for educational factors,including enhanced professor-student interaction, future competency development,and faculty professional development.
      번역하기

      This study aims to explore the factors that enhance the quality of medicaleducation from a higher education perspective. By reconceptualizing the"Performance" variable in the traditional Importance-Performance Analysis (IPA)as "Preparedness" for diagn...

      This study aims to explore the factors that enhance the quality of medicaleducation from a higher education perspective. By reconceptualizing the"Performance" variable in the traditional Importance-Performance Analysis (IPA)as "Preparedness" for diagnosing future-response capabilities, this researchanalyzes the perceived importance of each factor and the actual level ofreadiness within medical schools as reported by faculty members. To achievethis, a survey was conducted with 33 medical education faculty members acrossSouth Korea. The data were analyzed using Importance-Preparedness Analysis(IPA) alongside Borich Needs Analysis and the Locus for Focus model.
      The results showed that the perceived importance of all items wassignificantly higher than the actual level of preparedness, indicating a highawareness of the need to improve medical education quality despite relativelyinsufficient readiness in practice. Specifically, there was a high demand forimprovement in pedagogical elements such as activating professor-studentinteraction, developing future competencies, and supporting faculty professionaldevelopment. Conversely, traditional educational areas—such as clinical practiceand the appropriateness of assessment implementation—showed a relativelystable level of preparedness. These trends were further validated through theBorich Needs and Locus for Focus analyses.
      The findings suggest that to enhance the quality of medical education, it is necessary to maintain the existing clinical-centered system while implementingstrategic improvements and institutional support for educational factors,including enhanced professor-student interaction, future competency development,and faculty professional development.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼