RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    韓國과 中國의 高等學校 經濟敎育 比較 硏究

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T13740880

    • 저자
    • 발행사항

      진주 : 경상대학교 대학원, 2015

    • 학위논문사항

      학위논문(석사) -- 경상대학교 대학원 , 일반사회교육학과 , 2015. 2

    • 발행연도

      2015

    • 작성언어

      한국어

    • 주제어
    • 발행국(도시)

      경상남도

    • 기타서명

      A Comparative Study of High School Economic Education in Korea and China

    • 형태사항

      v, 77 p. : 삽도 ; 27 cm

    • 소장기관
      • 경상국립대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    With the accelerated process of globalization, informationization and regionization, the exchanges between South Korea and China become more and more frequent. Especially bilateral trade has developed rapidly since 1992 when South Korea and China established diplomatic relations. By 2010, China has become the largest exporter, the largest trade surplus and the largest investor of South Korea. Therefore, this study compares the differences and similarities of the Korean and Chinese economic education. These two countries can learn from each other on the aspect of economic education.

    For this purpose, this study analyzes the content
    of current economic education curriculum and textbooks used in South Korea and China. From the perspective of education curriculum, this paper analyzes the background, characteristics and constitutes of Social studies Curriculum Revised in 2009 used in Korean high schools and New Curriculum Standards of Politics Education used in Chinese high schools. The number of hours in class and the number of hours in economic class of these two countries are compared as well. Lastly the differences and similarities of the objectives and content of economic education are compared. From the perspective of economic education textbooks, this paper compares the types and systems of economic education textbooks of these two countries. And then this paper compares content of economic education textbooks of these two countries based on three criteria: “the same theme, the same explanation”,“the same them, different explanation”and“different themes”.

    The results of this study are shown in the following perspectives. From the perspective of educational curriculum, Korean economic education cultivates democratic citizens through microeconomic and macroeconomic concepts such as concepts of market economy, operating principles and phenomena. Chinese economic education also simply teaches elements about market economy. However the focus of Chinese economic education is to cultivate students’ ideals and beliefs, patriotism, civic virtues through socialist economic system, distribution system and the importance of government regulation. From the perspective of textbooks, Korean and Chinese textbooks have the same description about twelve topics such as foreign exchange, consumption, enterprises and so on, while they have different explanations about thirteen topics such as currency, credit cards, price changes and so forth. This thesis also illustrates some economic content appeared in Korean textbooks such as scarcity, diverse economic system, market demand and supply etc. and some economic content appeared in Chinese textbooks such as socialist market economy, scientific outlook on development, well-off society and so on.
    번역하기

    With the accelerated process of globalization, informationization and regionization, the exchanges between South Korea and China become more and more frequent. Especially bilateral trade has developed rapidly since 1992 when South Korea and China esta...

    With the accelerated process of globalization, informationization and regionization, the exchanges between South Korea and China become more and more frequent. Especially bilateral trade has developed rapidly since 1992 when South Korea and China established diplomatic relations. By 2010, China has become the largest exporter, the largest trade surplus and the largest investor of South Korea. Therefore, this study compares the differences and similarities of the Korean and Chinese economic education. These two countries can learn from each other on the aspect of economic education.

    For this purpose, this study analyzes the content
    of current economic education curriculum and textbooks used in South Korea and China. From the perspective of education curriculum, this paper analyzes the background, characteristics and constitutes of Social studies Curriculum Revised in 2009 used in Korean high schools and New Curriculum Standards of Politics Education used in Chinese high schools. The number of hours in class and the number of hours in economic class of these two countries are compared as well. Lastly the differences and similarities of the objectives and content of economic education are compared. From the perspective of economic education textbooks, this paper compares the types and systems of economic education textbooks of these two countries. And then this paper compares content of economic education textbooks of these two countries based on three criteria: “the same theme, the same explanation”,“the same them, different explanation”and“different themes”.

    The results of this study are shown in the following perspectives. From the perspective of educational curriculum, Korean economic education cultivates democratic citizens through microeconomic and macroeconomic concepts such as concepts of market economy, operating principles and phenomena. Chinese economic education also simply teaches elements about market economy. However the focus of Chinese economic education is to cultivate students’ ideals and beliefs, patriotism, civic virtues through socialist economic system, distribution system and the importance of government regulation. From the perspective of textbooks, Korean and Chinese textbooks have the same description about twelve topics such as foreign exchange, consumption, enterprises and so on, while they have different explanations about thirteen topics such as currency, credit cards, price changes and so forth. This thesis also illustrates some economic content appeared in Korean textbooks such as scarcity, diverse economic system, market demand and supply etc. and some economic content appeared in Chinese textbooks such as socialist market economy, scientific outlook on development, well-off society and so on.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 서론 1
    • 1. 연구의 필요성 1
    • 2. 연구의 목적과 방법 2
    • 3. 연구의 제한점 3
    • Ⅱ. 현행 사회과 교육과정 비교 4
    • Ⅰ. 서론 1
    • 1. 연구의 필요성 1
    • 2. 연구의 목적과 방법 2
    • 3. 연구의 제한점 3
    • Ⅱ. 현행 사회과 교육과정 비교 4
    • 1. 한국 고등학교 2009개정 사회과 교육과정 4
    • 1) 배경과 특징 4
    • 2) 편제와 내용구성 6
    • 2. 중국 고급중학교 사상정치 신 과정표준 7
    • 1) 배경과 특징 9
    • 2) 편제와 내용구성 10
    • 3. 비교: 교육과정 내에서의 경제 교육의 비중 11
    • 1) 총수업 시수 11
    • 2) 경제 수업 시수 15
    • Ⅲ. 현행 경제 관련 교육과정 비교 16
    • 1. 경제 관련 교육 목표 16
    • 1) 한국 16
    • 2) 중국 17
    • 3) 비교 19
    • 2. 경제 관련 교육과정 내용 20
    • 1) 한국 20
    • 2) 중국 23
    • 3) 비교 25
    • Ⅳ. 경제 교과서 비교 27
    • 1. 경제 교과서의 종류와 구성 체계 27
    • 1) 경제 교과서의 종류 27
    • 2) 경제 교과서의 구성 체계 29
    • (1) 한국 29
    • (2) 중국 30
    • (3) 비교 31
    • 2. 경제 교과서 내용 체계 32
    • 1) 한국 32
    • 2) 중국 38
    • 3) 비교 42
    • (1) 같은 주제, 같은 설명 42
    • (2) 같은 주제, 다른 설명 47
    • (3) 다른 주제 52
    • Ⅴ. 결론 60
    • 참고문헌 63
    • 부록 65
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼