RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    빌렘 플루서의 매체미학: 기술이미지와 사진 = Vilem Flusser`s Media Aesthetics: Technical Image and Photography

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100643111

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This paper attempted to make a critical analysis of Vilem Flusser``s idea of technical image and photographical image. By doing so, it tried to develop the discussion about the ontology of technical image and to search for a more critical method. The conclusion can be summarized as follows: First, by taking the position of the image maker rather than of the spectator, Flusser stresses more on the production process of technical image than on its reception process. His position on image criticism is very significant because he points out the importance of analysis of image production process, which has been rather neglected in image criticism. Second, Flusser says that the main subject who contributes to producing a technical image is not human being but an apparatus or technology. He indicates that the analysis of an apparatus is a key point in the criticism of technical image, because the trace of an apparatus exists necessarily in all technical images. Third, he insists that to determine the meaning of technical image is not only the production apparatus(camera), but also the diffusion apparatus(media). This is very significant because the factor of the media has been nearly neglected in image criticism. Lastly, Flusser``s image theory is concerned not only with image criticism, but also with cultural criticism and criticism on human existence. Although Flusser``s image theory has major significance like this, I can``t agree his point that technical image refers only to the concept. I think that technical image indicates not only concept but also world, precisely light. Technical image is the result of merging program concepts with light reflected from the world. So the protagonists of technical image are not only the four ones that Flusser refers to ― camera apparatus, human being, media, spectator ― but also the world or reference. Otherwise, we lose all the human history under the visible form of a technical image, photo history, film history, visual communication history, etc. Technical image is the complex space in which operator, apparatus``s parameter, spectrum, diffuser and spectator intersect. To criticise this technical image is to be conscious of these five protagonists and to disentangle those mixed relations.
    번역하기

    This paper attempted to make a critical analysis of Vilem Flusser``s idea of technical image and photographical image. By doing so, it tried to develop the discussion about the ontology of technical image and to search for a more critical method. The ...

    This paper attempted to make a critical analysis of Vilem Flusser``s idea of technical image and photographical image. By doing so, it tried to develop the discussion about the ontology of technical image and to search for a more critical method. The conclusion can be summarized as follows: First, by taking the position of the image maker rather than of the spectator, Flusser stresses more on the production process of technical image than on its reception process. His position on image criticism is very significant because he points out the importance of analysis of image production process, which has been rather neglected in image criticism. Second, Flusser says that the main subject who contributes to producing a technical image is not human being but an apparatus or technology. He indicates that the analysis of an apparatus is a key point in the criticism of technical image, because the trace of an apparatus exists necessarily in all technical images. Third, he insists that to determine the meaning of technical image is not only the production apparatus(camera), but also the diffusion apparatus(media). This is very significant because the factor of the media has been nearly neglected in image criticism. Lastly, Flusser``s image theory is concerned not only with image criticism, but also with cultural criticism and criticism on human existence. Although Flusser``s image theory has major significance like this, I can``t agree his point that technical image refers only to the concept. I think that technical image indicates not only concept but also world, precisely light. Technical image is the result of merging program concepts with light reflected from the world. So the protagonists of technical image are not only the four ones that Flusser refers to ― camera apparatus, human being, media, spectator ― but also the world or reference. Otherwise, we lose all the human history under the visible form of a technical image, photo history, film history, visual communication history, etc. Technical image is the complex space in which operator, apparatus``s parameter, spectrum, diffuser and spectator intersect. To criticise this technical image is to be conscious of these five protagonists and to disentangle those mixed relations.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 Flusser, Vilém, "Writings" University of Minnesota Press 126-131, 2002

    2 Schwendener, Martha, "Vilém Flusser's Theories of Photography and Technical Images in a U. S. Art Historical Context" (18) : 1-19, 2014

    3 Flusser, Vilém, "The Photograph as Post-Industrial Object: An Essay on the Ontological Status of Objects" 19 (19): 329-332, 1986

    4 Flusser, Vilém, "Pour une philosophie de la photographie" Circé 1996

    5 Bazin, André, "Ontologie de l'image photographique"

    6 Krauss, Rosalind, "Nightwalkers" 45 : 33-38, 1981

    7 Park, Sangwoo, "Les empreintes digitales et Francis Galton" (28) : 207-219, 2009

    8 Barthes, Roland, "Le message photographique" 1 (1): 127-138, 1961

    9 Flusser, Vilém, "La production photographique, résumé de la conférence Ⅰ dans l'Ecole nationale supérieure de la photographie d'Arles"

    10 Flusser, Vilém, "La diffusion photographique, résumé de la conférence Ⅱ dans l'Ecole nationale supérieure de la photographie d'Arles"

    1 Flusser, Vilém, "Writings" University of Minnesota Press 126-131, 2002

    2 Schwendener, Martha, "Vilém Flusser's Theories of Photography and Technical Images in a U. S. Art Historical Context" (18) : 1-19, 2014

    3 Flusser, Vilém, "The Photograph as Post-Industrial Object: An Essay on the Ontological Status of Objects" 19 (19): 329-332, 1986

    4 Flusser, Vilém, "Pour une philosophie de la photographie" Circé 1996

    5 Bazin, André, "Ontologie de l'image photographique"

    6 Krauss, Rosalind, "Nightwalkers" 45 : 33-38, 1981

    7 Park, Sangwoo, "Les empreintes digitales et Francis Galton" (28) : 207-219, 2009

    8 Barthes, Roland, "Le message photographique" 1 (1): 127-138, 1961

    9 Flusser, Vilém, "La production photographique, résumé de la conférence Ⅰ dans l'Ecole nationale supérieure de la photographie d'Arles"

    10 Flusser, Vilém, "La diffusion photographique, résumé de la conférence Ⅱ dans l'Ecole nationale supérieure de la photographie d'Arles"

    11 Dubois, Philippe, "L'acte photographique" Nathan 1990

    12 Lenot, Marc, "L'Expérience photographique" Publications de la Sorbonne 2014

    13 Flusser, Vilém, "Into the Universe of Technical Images" University of Minnesota Press 2011

    14 Flusser, Vilém, "Critique photographique, résumé de la conférence Ⅳ dans l'Ecole nationale supérieure de la photographie d'Arles"

    15 Flusser, Vilém, "Afterword" Reaktion Books 86-94, 2000

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2028 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2022-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2019-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2016-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2015-12-01 등재 등재후보로 하락 (기타) KCI등재후보
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2001-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.45 0.45 0.46
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.48 0.5 1.082 0.06
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼