RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재 SCOPUS

    SILS 포트를 이용한 단일공법 복강경하 질식자궁절제술과 삼공법 복강경하 질식자궁절제술의 비교 = A Comparison of Single-Port Laparoscopically Assisted Vaginal Hysterectomy Using Transumbilical Sils Port Access And Three-Port Laparoscopically Assisted Vaginal HysterectomySILS 포트를 이용한 단일공법 복강경하 질식자궁절제술과 삼공법 복강경하 질식자궁절제술의 비교

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82709390

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Objective The purpose of this study was to compare surgical outcomes and patients` satisfaction between single-port access laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy (SPA-LAVH) and conventional three-port access LAVH (TPA-LAVH) group. Methods A prospective analysis was performed in patients who underwent laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy at a Wonkwang University Hospital between April 2010 and May 2011, a total of 138 women were enrolled in this study. One of these procedures was chosen by patient and was performed with their consent. Sixty-fi ve women underwent SPA-LAVH using transumbilical SILS port access (SPA-LAVH group), and 73 women underwent conventional three-port LAVH (TPA-LAVH group). Results There were no statistical differences between groups in the patients` demographic characteristics, mean operating time (93.4±20.2 minutes vs. 95.1±28.7 minutes, P=0.696), postoperative changes in hemoglobin concentration (1.91±0.68 vs. 1.85±0.87 g/dL, P=0.667), weight of the resected uterus (261.7±205.3 g vs. 311.8±268.3 g, P=0.225), hospital stay (5.9±0.9 day vs. 6.4±1.6 day, P=0.063), the rate of using an additional trocar (1.5% vs. 0%, P=0.471), the rate of conversion to laparotomy (0% vs. 4.1%, P=0.098) and postoperative pain scores (visual analogue scale) for 48 hours. However, patients` satisfaction after 6 weeks later was signifi cantly greater in SPA-LAVH group than in conventional group, as evidenced by higher rate of fairly satisfactory (52.3% vs. 34.2%, P=0.032) and very satisfactory (33.8% vs. 17.8%, P=0.031). Conclusion SPA-LAVH using transumbilical SILS port access is comparable with TPA-LAVH in women undergoing LAVH. However, SPA-LAVH is better than TPA-LAVH in terms of satisfaction of patient.
    번역하기

    Objective The purpose of this study was to compare surgical outcomes and patients` satisfaction between single-port access laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy (SPA-LAVH) and conventional three-port access LAVH (TPA-LAVH) group. Methods A pr...

    Objective The purpose of this study was to compare surgical outcomes and patients` satisfaction between single-port access laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy (SPA-LAVH) and conventional three-port access LAVH (TPA-LAVH) group. Methods A prospective analysis was performed in patients who underwent laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy at a Wonkwang University Hospital between April 2010 and May 2011, a total of 138 women were enrolled in this study. One of these procedures was chosen by patient and was performed with their consent. Sixty-fi ve women underwent SPA-LAVH using transumbilical SILS port access (SPA-LAVH group), and 73 women underwent conventional three-port LAVH (TPA-LAVH group). Results There were no statistical differences between groups in the patients` demographic characteristics, mean operating time (93.4±20.2 minutes vs. 95.1±28.7 minutes, P=0.696), postoperative changes in hemoglobin concentration (1.91±0.68 vs. 1.85±0.87 g/dL, P=0.667), weight of the resected uterus (261.7±205.3 g vs. 311.8±268.3 g, P=0.225), hospital stay (5.9±0.9 day vs. 6.4±1.6 day, P=0.063), the rate of using an additional trocar (1.5% vs. 0%, P=0.471), the rate of conversion to laparotomy (0% vs. 4.1%, P=0.098) and postoperative pain scores (visual analogue scale) for 48 hours. However, patients` satisfaction after 6 weeks later was signifi cantly greater in SPA-LAVH group than in conventional group, as evidenced by higher rate of fairly satisfactory (52.3% vs. 34.2%, P=0.032) and very satisfactory (33.8% vs. 17.8%, P=0.031). Conclusion SPA-LAVH using transumbilical SILS port access is comparable with TPA-LAVH in women undergoing LAVH. However, SPA-LAVH is better than TPA-LAVH in terms of satisfaction of patient.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼