RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    독점규제법상 특수관계인과의 기업결합에 대한 규제 가능성 검토 = A Studies On The Regulations Of The Fusion With Special Related Persons In Monopoly Regulations Act

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76592393

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The special related persons mean that he has some relations with the concerned party of the fusions, mainly based upon the controls of business. Because the concerned party and the special related persons have already some relations based on control of business, it could be in doubt that the fusions of them could be corresponded with the essencial points, the creation of single business control of the fusions in Monopoly Regulations Act. But it is possible to take account of such a fusion, between the concerned party and the special related persons, as the fusions in Monopoly Regulations Act, as Gesetz gegen Wettbewerbsbeschrankungen in Germany has described. Korean Fair Trade Commission has treated this type of the fusions with the simplified review process. This process assumes the non-existance of competition restraints, but such assumptions could not exclude a review of competition restraints by Korean Fair Trade Commission. If the commission may carry out the review of competition restraints, it could evaluate the fusions as to horizontal, vertical and mixed one. Specially if the commission evaluate the horizontal fusions and the parties of the fusions exist in same business group, it could not be easy to acknowledge the competition restraints of the fusions, because the total market shares of these parties may not be varied. And as to mixed fusions, the possibility of the transfer of market dominant power by bundling under the convergence circumstance and the effect of the efficiency by bundling must be investigated together.
    번역하기

    The special related persons mean that he has some relations with the concerned party of the fusions, mainly based upon the controls of business. Because the concerned party and the special related persons have already some relations based on control o...

    The special related persons mean that he has some relations with the concerned party of the fusions, mainly based upon the controls of business. Because the concerned party and the special related persons have already some relations based on control of business, it could be in doubt that the fusions of them could be corresponded with the essencial points, the creation of single business control of the fusions in Monopoly Regulations Act. But it is possible to take account of such a fusion, between the concerned party and the special related persons, as the fusions in Monopoly Regulations Act, as Gesetz gegen Wettbewerbsbeschrankungen in Germany has described. Korean Fair Trade Commission has treated this type of the fusions with the simplified review process. This process assumes the non-existance of competition restraints, but such assumptions could not exclude a review of competition restraints by Korean Fair Trade Commission. If the commission may carry out the review of competition restraints, it could evaluate the fusions as to horizontal, vertical and mixed one. Specially if the commission evaluate the horizontal fusions and the parties of the fusions exist in same business group, it could not be easy to acknowledge the competition restraints of the fusions, because the total market shares of these parties may not be varied. And as to mixed fusions, the possibility of the transfer of market dominant power by bundling under the convergence circumstance and the effect of the efficiency by bundling must be investigated together.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 김도연, "컨버전스 시대 통신 사업자의 변화 in : 디지털 컨버전스" 커뮤 니케이션 북스 2004

    2 홍명수, "시장획정 방식의 개선과 과제" 법과사회이론학회 (29) : 241-273, 2005

    3 이민호, "기업결합에서의 경쟁제한성 판단 기준" 13 : 2006

    4 양명조, "경제법강의" 신조사 2008

    5 이기수, "경제법" 세창출판사 2006

    6 신현윤, "경제법" 법문사 2006

    7 권오승, "경제법" 법문사 2009

    8 정호열, "경제법" 박영사 2008

    9 Kling, M, "Kartellrecht" Verlag Franz Vahlen 2007

    10 Lange, K. W, "Handbuch zum deutschen und europäischen Kartellrecht"

    1 김도연, "컨버전스 시대 통신 사업자의 변화 in : 디지털 컨버전스" 커뮤 니케이션 북스 2004

    2 홍명수, "시장획정 방식의 개선과 과제" 법과사회이론학회 (29) : 241-273, 2005

    3 이민호, "기업결합에서의 경쟁제한성 판단 기준" 13 : 2006

    4 양명조, "경제법강의" 신조사 2008

    5 이기수, "경제법" 세창출판사 2006

    6 신현윤, "경제법" 법문사 2006

    7 권오승, "경제법" 법문사 2009

    8 정호열, "경제법" 박영사 2008

    9 Kling, M, "Kartellrecht" Verlag Franz Vahlen 2007

    10 Lange, K. W, "Handbuch zum deutschen und europäischen Kartellrecht"

    11 Knut Werner Lange, "Handbuch zum deutschen und europäischen Kartellrecht"

    12 Rittner, F, "Europäisches und deutsches Wirtschaftsrecht" C. F. Müller 2008

    13 Oliver E. Williamson, "Antitrust Lenses and the Uses of Transaction Cost Economics Reasoning in: Antitrust, Innovation, and Competitiveness" Oxford Univ. Press 140-, 1992

    14 Williamson,O.E, "Antitrust Lenses and the Uses of Transaction Cost Economics Reasoning in Antitrust, Innovation, and Competitiveness" Oxford Univ. Press 1992

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2022 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2019-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2016-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2012-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2009-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    2008-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.86 0.86 0.93
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.87 0.86 0.981 0.86
    더보기

    연관 공개강의(KOCW)

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼