Several methods are known for detecting antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen (anti-HBs). Among them, passive hemagglutination (PHA) and radioimmunoassay (RIA) are now used most frequently for measurement of anti-HBs in serum, especially in Korea. B...
Several methods are known for detecting antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen (anti-HBs). Among them, passive hemagglutination (PHA) and radioimmunoassay (RIA) are now used most frequently for measurement of anti-HBs in serum, especially in Korea. Between them, RIA is more sensitive and specific than PHA, but more expensive, complex and requires the availability of a gamma counter. The sensitivity and specificity of PHA falls somewhat short of RIA, it has the advantage in terms of its methodology and its expenses. The technique of RIA is best employed in case the more precise determination of anti-HBs is required, for instance, for the etiological diagnosis of viral hepatitis or for the follow-up of acute B viral hepatitis, Because it is less expensive and simpler to perform, PHA is widely applied for large scale-screening or under the circumstances where economic and technical conditions do not allow the use of RIA, Korea is the endemic area of hepatitis B, and recently hepatitis B vaccination is being conducted nationwide. Therefore, the frequency with which these test is to be performed for the detection of anti-HBs is extremely high. For the purpose of comparing two different detecting methods, PHA and RIA, with respect to anti-HBs in the vaccinated individuals, the author determined anti-HBs by both PHA and RIA simultaneously in one hundred and eleven Korean hospital personnel (nurses and nurse-aids of Paik Hospital, Seoul) who had been previously vaccinated with Hevac-B Pasteur (Institut Pasteur). Results were as follows: 1) Anti-HBs was positive in 110 of 111 subjects by RIA. Among these 110 RIA-positive subjects, positive rate by PHA was 92.7% (102 subjects), and false negative rate 7.3% (8 subjects). Of the 106 subjects with the titers equal to or more than 10 sample ratio units (SRU) by RIA the figure which is considered to bestow immunity, the false negative rate was 4.7% (5 subjects) by PHA. 2) Most of the PHA-false negative subjects were among the subjects with the titers less than 50 SRU by RIA. In half the subjects with titers in the range of 10 to 49. 9 SRU the PHA was positive, The PHA positivity and the specific values of RIA titers showed no significant correlations. To summarize, it is preferable to test the status of the anti-HBs in the vaccinated individuals by PHA, which is more economical and easy to perform even in an inadequately equipped institutions.