RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      기술ㆍ가정 교과에 대한 중학생들의 인식에 관한 연구 = Research on the Cognizance of Middle School Students for Technology and Home Economics Curriculum

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A102598949

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Aims of this research are to understand the level of interest and the level of difficulty in technology and home Economics subject, and furthermore how they feel about the curriculum for second grade middle school students. The research concludes as f...

      Aims of this research are to understand the level of interest and the level of difficulty in technology and home Economics subject, and furthermore how they feel about the curriculum for second grade middle school students. The research concludes as follows:
      First, according to sex, male students had more interest in technology, whereas female students had more interest in home economics. According to region, students in Chungnam were interested in technology, and students in Jeonnam in home economics. Also, students with higher academic performance took more interest in technology compared to those with lower academic performance.
      Second, female students found the technology curriculum more difficult than male students did. Students in Jeonnam region found the technology curriculum more difficult than students in Chungnam did. In addition, the lower their scores in technology/home economics subject, the more difficult they found the curriculum to be.
      Third, students had difference perspectives on the contents of technology/home economics curriculum according to sex, region and overall academic performance. Male students and students with higher academic performance had positive perspectives on the textbook curriculum. And students in Chungnam region had positive perspectives on technology, while students in Jeonnam had more positive perspectives on home economics curriculum.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 서 론
      • Ⅱ. 이론적 배경
      • Ⅲ. 연구의 방법
      • Ⅳ. 연구 결과 및 해석
      • Ⅴ. 결론 및 제언
      • Ⅰ. 서 론
      • Ⅱ. 이론적 배경
      • Ⅲ. 연구의 방법
      • Ⅳ. 연구 결과 및 해석
      • Ⅴ. 결론 및 제언
      • 참 고 문 헌
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼