RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      한글판 우울증 선별도구(Patient Health Questionnaire-9, PHQ-9)의 신뢰도와 타당도 = Reliability and Validity of the Korean Version of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100815182

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Objective : The reliability and validity of the Korean version of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ- 9) was examined in Korean patients with depressive symptoms. Methods : Eighty six outpatients diagnosed as major depressive disorder or depressive episode of bipolar I disorder according to the DSM-IV criteria were assessed with the PHQ-9, Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS), the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self Report (QIDS-SR), and the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D). Results : The Cronbach's alpha coefficient from the PHQ-9 was 0.81. And the correlations of each item with the total score were statistically significant (r=0.28-0.70, p<0.01). The test-retest correlation coefficient (r=0.89, p<0.01) was relatively high and correlations of the PHQ-9 with the HDRS, QIDS-SR and CES-D were 0.70, 0.81, and 0.81 respectively. Conclusion : These results demonstrated that the Korean version of PHQ-9 could be a reliable and valid tool for the screening and assessment of depressive patients. The Korean version of PHQ-9 will be a useful tool for screening depressive symptoms in Korea.
      번역하기

      Objective : The reliability and validity of the Korean version of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ- 9) was examined in Korean patients with depressive symptoms. Methods : Eighty six outpatients diagnosed as major depressive disorder or depressi...

      Objective : The reliability and validity of the Korean version of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ- 9) was examined in Korean patients with depressive symptoms. Methods : Eighty six outpatients diagnosed as major depressive disorder or depressive episode of bipolar I disorder according to the DSM-IV criteria were assessed with the PHQ-9, Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS), the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self Report (QIDS-SR), and the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D). Results : The Cronbach's alpha coefficient from the PHQ-9 was 0.81. And the correlations of each item with the total score were statistically significant (r=0.28-0.70, p<0.01). The test-retest correlation coefficient (r=0.89, p<0.01) was relatively high and correlations of the PHQ-9 with the HDRS, QIDS-SR and CES-D were 0.70, 0.81, and 0.81 respectively. Conclusion : These results demonstrated that the Korean version of PHQ-9 could be a reliable and valid tool for the screening and assessment of depressive patients. The Korean version of PHQ-9 will be a useful tool for screening depressive symptoms in Korea.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 박승진, "한글판 우울증 선별도구(Patient Health Questionnaire-9, PHQ-9)의 신뢰도와 타당도" 대한불안의학회 6 (6): 119-124, 2010

      2 안용민, "한글판 Montgomery-Åsberg 우울증 평가 척도의 표준화 연구" 대한신경정신의학회 44 (44): 466-476, 2005

      3 이중서, "한국판 Hamilton 우울증 평가 척도의 신뢰도, 타당도 연구" 대한신경정신의학회 44 (44): 456-465, 2005

      4 이정균, "한국정신장애의 역학적 조사연구"

      5 최홍석, "주요우울장애의 선별 도구로서 한국판" 대한가정의학회 28 (28): 114-119, 2007

      6 Spitzer RL, "Valiation and utility of a self-report version of PRIME-MD: the PHQ primary care study. Primary Evaluation of Mental Disorders. Patient Health Questionnaire" 282 : 1737-1744, 1999

      7 Andrade L, "The epidemiology of major depressive episodes: Results from the International Consoritium of Psychiatric Epidemiologt (ICPE) Surveys" 12 : 3-21, 2003

      8 Kessler RC, "The epidemiology of major depressive disorder" 289 : 3095-3105, 2003

      9 Kroenke K, "The PHQ-9: validaity of a brief depression severity measure" 16 : 606-613, 2001

      10 Davidson J, "The Montgomery- Asberg Depression Scale: Reliability and validity" 73 : 544-558, 1986

      1 박승진, "한글판 우울증 선별도구(Patient Health Questionnaire-9, PHQ-9)의 신뢰도와 타당도" 대한불안의학회 6 (6): 119-124, 2010

      2 안용민, "한글판 Montgomery-Åsberg 우울증 평가 척도의 표준화 연구" 대한신경정신의학회 44 (44): 466-476, 2005

      3 이중서, "한국판 Hamilton 우울증 평가 척도의 신뢰도, 타당도 연구" 대한신경정신의학회 44 (44): 456-465, 2005

      4 이정균, "한국정신장애의 역학적 조사연구"

      5 최홍석, "주요우울장애의 선별 도구로서 한국판" 대한가정의학회 28 (28): 114-119, 2007

      6 Spitzer RL, "Valiation and utility of a self-report version of PRIME-MD: the PHQ primary care study. Primary Evaluation of Mental Disorders. Patient Health Questionnaire" 282 : 1737-1744, 1999

      7 Andrade L, "The epidemiology of major depressive episodes: Results from the International Consoritium of Psychiatric Epidemiologt (ICPE) Surveys" 12 : 3-21, 2003

      8 Kessler RC, "The epidemiology of major depressive disorder" 289 : 3095-3105, 2003

      9 Kroenke K, "The PHQ-9: validaity of a brief depression severity measure" 16 : 606-613, 2001

      10 Davidson J, "The Montgomery- Asberg Depression Scale: Reliability and validity" 73 : 544-558, 1986

      11 Pignone MP, "Screening for depression in adults: a summary of the evidence for the U. S. Preventive Services Task Force" 136 : 765-776, 2002

      12 Hamilton M, "Mood disorders: clinical features. In: Comprehensive Textbook of Psychiatry. Vol. 5." Williams & Wilkins 892-913, 1989

      13 Chon KK, "Integrated Adaptation of CES-D in Korea" 6 : 59-76, 2001

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2028 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2022-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2015-12-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2008-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.29 0.29 0.28
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.25 0.25 0.636 0
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼