2024년 개정 헬싱키선언의 의의와 함의 = Significance and implications of the 2024 revision of the Declaration of Helsinki

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Background: The Declaration of Helsinki is the first self-regulatory professional standard developed by physicians for guiding medical research. Revised ten times, most recently in October 2024, it continues to evolve as a living document for medical research ethics. This study examined the key components and significance of the most recent revisions.
Current Concepts: The Declaration of Helsinki was initially developed in response to unethical research conducted by Nazi doctors during World War II. It has since evolved into a globally recognized ethical framework that shapes both international and domestic law. The 2024 revision resulted from extensive international collaboration within the global community. Notable changes include replacing the term “subjects” with “research participants” and broadening the scope of responsibility to encompass the entire research team, not just the physicians. A new understanding of vulnerability was introduced, underscoring the fair and responsible inclusion of people with vulnerability. In addition, provisions for post-trial access to treatment were strengthened.
Discussion and Conclusion: The 2024 revision process was marked by transparency and fairness, ensuring the updated declaration appropriately reflects contemporary challenges in research ethics. This revision incorporates modern developments and addresses evolving issues, including those highlighted by the global pandemic. The updated declaration offers a comprehensive framework for conducting ethical research in the 21st century, promoting a more inclusive, responsible, and transparent approach to research practices.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 "World Medical Association. WMA Declaration of Helsinki : ethical principles for medical research involving human participants. Accessed October 25, 2024"

2 Paik JH, "What is the Helsinki Declaration, which is at the center of the controversy surrounding Professor Hwang Woosuk?"

3 Schroeder D, "Vulnerability revisited:leaving no one behind in research. SpringerBriefs in research and innovation governance" Springer 1-23, 2024

4 Reverby SM, "Tuskegee’s truths: rethinking the Tuskegee syphilis study" University of North Carolina Press 2000

5 Kim OJ, "Tuskegee’s truth: Revisiting the Tuskegee syphilis study" (39) : 260-270, 2001

6 박상민 ; 박경태 ; 최병인, "The operation of institutional review boards in Korean military research institutions and the protection program for active-duty military research participants" 10 : 39-70, 2020

7 현승주 ; 구자일, "The necessity of establishing a ROK armed forces institutional review board" 14 : 107-128, 2020

8 Meltzer LA, "The Oxford textbook of clinical research ethics" Oxford University Press 377-385, 2008

9 Emmanuel EJ, "The Oxford textbook of clinical research ethics" Oxford University Press 123-135, 2008

10 김옥주, "The Nuremberg Code and ethics of human subject research" 5 : 42-62, 2002

11 Annas GJ, "The Nazi Doctors and the Nuremberg Code: human rights in human experimentation" Oxford University Press 1992

12 Ndebele P, "The Declaration of Helsinki, 50 years later" 310 : 2145-2146, 2013

13 Resneck JS Jr, "Revisions to the Declaration of Helsinki on Its 60th Anniversary : a modernized set of ethical principles to promote and ensure respect for participants in a rapidly innovating medical research ecosystem" 2024

14 Menikoff J, "Protecting participants is not the top priority in clinical research" 332 : 195-196, 2024

15 Jo MK, "Professor Hwang Woo-suk clarifies that he was not aware of the Declaration of Helsinki regarding egg donation"

16 Boynton PM, "People should participate in, not be subjects of, research" 317 : 1521-, 1998

17 Chalmers I, "People are"participants"in research. Further suggestions for other terms to describe"participants"are needed" 318 : 1141-, 1999

18 Kurihara C, "Linking the Declarations of Helsinki and of Taipei : critical challenges of future-oriented research ethics" 11 : 579714-, 2020

19 Kim MK, "Korea’s First Chair of the World Medical Association (WMA), Dr. Park Jeong-yul, Vice President of the Korean Medical Association, elected as the Chair of WMA"

20 LaCourse S, "Importance of inclusion of pregnant and breastfeeding women in COVID-19 therapeutic trials" 71 : 879-881, 2020

21 Guillemin J, "Hidden atrocities: Japanese germ warfare and American obstruction of justice at the Tokyo trial" Columbia University Press 2017

22 박영수 ; 김옥주, "Government Initiatives for Research Ethics During COVID-19 Pandemic in Korea" 39 : e116-, 2024

23 Harris SH, "Factories of death: Japanese biological warfare, 1932-1945, and the American cover-up" Routledge 2002

24 Kwon I, "Ethics involving human subject research in military medicine" 4 : 23-29, 2022

25 Kim J, "Ethical modernization : research misconduct and research ethics reforms in Korea following the Hwang affair" 19 : 355-380, 2013

26 유수정 ; 김은애, "Ethical considerations of the researcher and institutional review board on disaster research" 10 : 69-98, 2021

27 World Medical Association, "Declaration of Taipei: research on health databases, big data and biobanks"

28 World Medical Association, "Declaration of Helsinki:recommendations guiding medical doctors in biomedical research involving human subjects"

29 Bierer BE, "Declaration of Helsinki-Revisions for the 21st Century" 2024

30 Whitehead CL, "Consider pregnancy in COVID-19therapeutic drug and vaccine trials" 395 : e92-, 2020

31 방은화 ; 김옥주, "COVID-19 Pandemic and pregnancy clinical research ethics" 23 : 17-39, 2022

32 Jones JH, "Bad blood: the Tuskegee syphilis experiment" Collier Macmillan Publishers 1981

33 Pastick KA, "A systematic review of treatment and outcomes of pregnant women with covid-19-a call for clinical trials" 7 : ofaa350-, 2020