This study analyzed the infrastructure received from the public perspective as donations and public contributions evolved with changes in demand under the framework of urban planning changes. By quantitatively and qualitatively analyzing the public co...
This study analyzed the infrastructure received from the public perspective as donations and public contributions evolved with changes in demand under the framework of urban planning changes. By quantitatively and qualitatively analyzing the public concern of infrastructure in urban planning change project sites, the purpose of the system is to identify the detailed characteristics of public concern and the aspects of urban space.
The Seoul city's pre-negotiation system for urban planning changes, which was expanded in the scope of donation, was introduced to minimize side effects such as preferential dispute and reckless development during urban planning changes of more than 10,000 square meters. Among the four sites that have been negotiated, two sites were selected for completion and use, and two sites that received donation loans were selected as comparative groups considering conditions such as regions and areas.
In this work, we approach it by dividing it into two publicities by reflecting the concept of publicness that has changed from the past to the present. Through prior research, it was possible to classify the sub-elements into behavioral and social public characteristics, and the sub-elements were organized into accessibility, openness, connectivity, and sociality. The public nature of infrastructure by project sites was objectively identified by conducting surveys and interviews with experts who are researchers and practitioners by dividing them into quantitative and qualitative keywords.
Facilities received through donation and public contributions showed high behavioral and social public characteristics, respectively, and were leading to the use of the facilities and revitalization of the region through high-level planning and empirical analysis. Among the factors that resulted from these results were the implementation of the top-down and botton-up plans and the revision of the system according to changes, affecting the expansion of the concept of public contribution.
This study identified the public nature of each project site and analyzed the factors that represent different publicities under the change in how the infrastructure in urban planning is public. It is differentiated from prior research in that it compares and analyzes the two timing points of the system and derives the factors of the results away from securing or analyzing the effectiveness of the infrastructure, settling and improving the system. It is necessary to compare the public concern of business sites with diverse infrastructure than this study, and we hope that it will help to provide basic data on how to secure the public concern of urban planning and to identify and manage the current address of urban planning.