RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    집단응집력이 팀중심편향에 미치는 영향 = Effect of the Group Cohesion Influences on Team-Serving Bias

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100945587

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Purpose: The objectives of the present study were to investigate 189 male athletes playing soccer, rugby and water polo 1) to demonstrate the presence of the team-serving bias and thereby examine the validity of the Causal Dimension Scale for Teams (CDS-T), a measurement tool of team attribution, and 2) to verify the effects of group cohesion on the team-serving bias. Results: A team-serving bias was found in the locus of causality, stability and external control factors of team attribution, thus validating the measurement toolused in the study. Further, the moderating effect between group cohesion and team-serving bias was verified via hierarchical regression analysis. The direction of the moderating effects, as shown in the interaction graphs, indicated that the team-serving bias was higher for Individual-centred Task-oriented cohesion and Group-centred Task-oriented cohesion. Conclusion: we have shown that the team-serving bias tends to be stronger when group cohesion is higher. Further, we found that among the different types of group cohesion, there were moderating effects of task cohesion but not of social cohesion.
    번역하기

    Purpose: The objectives of the present study were to investigate 189 male athletes playing soccer, rugby and water polo 1) to demonstrate the presence of the team-serving bias and thereby examine the validity of the Causal Dimension Scale for Teams (C...

    Purpose: The objectives of the present study were to investigate 189 male athletes playing soccer, rugby and water polo 1) to demonstrate the presence of the team-serving bias and thereby examine the validity of the Causal Dimension Scale for Teams (CDS-T), a measurement tool of team attribution, and 2) to verify the effects of group cohesion on the team-serving bias. Results: A team-serving bias was found in the locus of causality, stability and external control factors of team attribution, thus validating the measurement toolused in the study. Further, the moderating effect between group cohesion and team-serving bias was verified via hierarchical regression analysis. The direction of the moderating effects, as shown in the interaction graphs, indicated that the team-serving bias was higher for Individual-centred Task-oriented cohesion and Group-centred Task-oriented cohesion. Conclusion: we have shown that the team-serving bias tends to be stronger when group cohesion is higher. Further, we found that among the different types of group cohesion, there were moderating effects of task cohesion but not of social cohesion.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 서영석, "상담심리 연구에서 매개효과와 조절효과 검증: 개념적 구분 및 자료 분석 시 고려 사항" 한국상담심리학회 22 (22): 1147-1168, 2010

    2 Bukowski, W. M., "Winners’and Losers’ attributions for success and failure in a series of athletic events" 2 : 195-210, 1980

    3 Tajfel, H., "The social psychology of intergroup relations" Brooks/Cole 33-48, 1979

    4 Heider, F., "The psychology of interpersonal relationships" Wiley 1958

    5 Weiner, B., "The development of an attribution-based theory of motivation : A history of idea" 45 (45): 28-36, 2010

    6 Browne, M. W., "Testing Structural equation models" Sage 136-162, 1993

    7 Greenlees, I., "Team-referent attributions among sport performers" 76 (76): 477-487, 2005

    8 Martin, L. J., "Team attributions in sport : A meta-analysis" 24 : 157-174, 2012

    9 Gill, D. L., "Success-failure attributions in competitive groups : An exception to egocentrism" 2 : 106-114, 1980

    10 Bradley, G. W., "Self-serving biases in the attribution process : A reexamination of the fact or fiction question" 36 : 56-71, 1978

    1 서영석, "상담심리 연구에서 매개효과와 조절효과 검증: 개념적 구분 및 자료 분석 시 고려 사항" 한국상담심리학회 22 (22): 1147-1168, 2010

    2 Bukowski, W. M., "Winners’and Losers’ attributions for success and failure in a series of athletic events" 2 : 195-210, 1980

    3 Tajfel, H., "The social psychology of intergroup relations" Brooks/Cole 33-48, 1979

    4 Heider, F., "The psychology of interpersonal relationships" Wiley 1958

    5 Weiner, B., "The development of an attribution-based theory of motivation : A history of idea" 45 (45): 28-36, 2010

    6 Browne, M. W., "Testing Structural equation models" Sage 136-162, 1993

    7 Greenlees, I., "Team-referent attributions among sport performers" 76 (76): 477-487, 2005

    8 Martin, L. J., "Team attributions in sport : A meta-analysis" 24 : 157-174, 2012

    9 Gill, D. L., "Success-failure attributions in competitive groups : An exception to egocentrism" 2 : 106-114, 1980

    10 Bradley, G. W., "Self-serving biases in the attribution process : A reexamination of the fact or fiction question" 36 : 56-71, 1978

    11 Zaccaro, S. J., "Self-serving attributions for the individual and group performance" 50 : 257-263, 1987

    12 Mullen, B., "Self-serving attributions for performance in naturalistic settings : A meta-analytic review" 18 : 3-22, 1988

    13 Taylor, D. M., "Self-serving and group-serving bias in attribution" 113 (113): 201-211, 1981

    14 Bird, A. M., "Self versus team attributions : A test of the team phenomenon" 49 : 260-268, 1978

    15 Tajfel, H., "Psychology of intergroup relations" Nelson-Hall 33-48, 1986

    16 Weiner, B., "Perceiving the causes of success and failure" General Learning Press 1971

    17 Gill, D. L., "Open-ended attributions in team competition" 4 : 159-169, 1982

    18 Atkinson, J. W., "Motivational determinants of risk-taking behavior" 64 : 359-372, 1957

    19 Biddle, S., "Handbook of research on sport psychology" 437-, 1993

    20 Carron, A. V., "Group dynamic in sport" Fitness Information Technology 1998

    21 Rotter, J. B., "Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement" 80 : 1-28, 1966

    22 Chow, G. M., "Exploring the relationship between collective efficacy, perceptions of success, and team attributions" 26 : 1179-1189, 2008

    23 Lee, H. K., "Development of group cohesion questionnaire for Korean athletes" 6 (6): 15-26, 1995

    24 Bird, A. M., "Convergent and incremental effects of cohesion on attributions for self and team" 2 : 181-194, 1980

    25 Carron, A. V., "Cohesiveness in sport groups : Interpretations and considerations" 4 : 123-138, 1982

    26 Carron, A. V., "Cohesion and performance in sport: A meta-analysis" 24 : 168-188, 2002

    27 Williams, J. M., "Causal relationships among cohesion, satisfaction, and performance in women" 4 : 324-337, 1982

    28 Hewstone, M., "Causal attribution: From cognitive processes to collective beliefs" Blackwell 1989

    29 Allen, M. S., "Attribution, emotion, and collective efficacy in sports teams" 13 : 205-217, 2009

    30 Zuckerman, M., "Attribution of success and failure revisited, or : The motivational bias is alive and well in attribution theory" 47 : 245-287, 1979

    31 Forsyth, D. R., "Attribution in groups : Estimations of personal contributions to collective endeavors" 25 : 367-381, 1994

    32 Le Foll, D., "Attribution feedback-induced changes in functional and dysfunctional attributions, expectations of success, hopefulness, and short-term persistence in novel sport" 9 : 77-101, 2008

    33 Weiner, B., "An attributional theory of motivation and emotion" Springer-Verlag 1986

    34 Spink, K. S., "Ambiguity of outcome and causal attributions" 2 : 237-244, 1980

    35 Allen, M. S., "A systematic review of content themes in sport attribution research : 1954~2011" 10 (10): 1-8, 2012

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2002-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1999-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.32 1.32 1.66
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.52 1.58 1.732 0.35
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼