임파워먼트와 사회복지실천

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

I developed the ability inspiration oriented group social work program for self-sustaining working women and analyzed its effectiveness quantitatively and qualitatively. First of all, to analyze the effectiveness of the program, I divided the dependent variables into self-efficiency, self-identity, ability to cope with and the ability of social problem solving. And then, I applied the group social work program developed in this study,
and analyzed whether the differences between experimental group and controlled group show a meaningful result statistically. To do this, I used t-verification and Man-Whitney verification method for the verification on hypothesis 1 and hypothesis 2. And then, with a quantitative analysis like this, at the same time, I analyzed the process of ability inspiration in the group and used the method of quantitative and qualitative analysis describing the process of access activity for resource. Furthermore, I analyzed the term evaluation through a evaluation questionnaire based on the 3 question items; meaningfulness, evaluation on self and degree of contentment. The conclusion based on the results of this study is as follows. The two hypotheses developed in this study are maintained from the results of verification on these hypotheses. First, from the verification on hypothesis 1 (a group adopted ability inspiration oriented group interruption will show a much better progress in self-efficiency than a group not adopted the group interruption), experimental former test, but controlled group showed average point of 7.13. This means the meaningful difference is in self-efficiency scale point. (The more the point is, the higher a level of self-efficiency is.) Second, from the verification on hypothesis 2 (a group adopted ability inspiration oriented group interruption will show a more meaningful progress in self-identity than a group not adopted the group interruption), experimental group showed average point of 10.14 in the latter test compared with the former test, but controlled group showed average point of 4.25. This means the meaningful difference is in self-efficiency scale point. (The more the point is, the higher a level of self-efficiency is.) Third, from the verification on hypothesis 3(a group adopted ability inspiration oriented group interruption will show a more meaningful progress in the ability to cope with than a group not adopted the group
interruption), experimental group showed average point of 12.29 in the latter test compared with the former test, but controlled group showed average point of 2.25. This means the meaningful difference is in group consciousness scale. (The more the point is, the stronger the ability to cope with is.) Fourth, from the verification on hypothesis 4 (a group adopted ability inspiration oriented group interruption will show a more meaningful progress in the ability of social problem solving than a group not adopted the group
interruption), experimental group showed average point of 9.14 in the latter test compared with the former test, but controlled group showed average point of 3.88. This means the meaningful difference is in the ability of the
social problem solving. (The more the point is, the higher a level of social problem solving is.)
The result of the verification on these hypotheses suggests that experimental group showed a meaningful progress in the 4 dependent variables derived from the ability inspiration oriented social work practice.