AI와 개인정보 = Artificial Intelligence and Personal Identifying Information

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Self-driving cars and some drones can already be considered artificial intelligence in terms of functionality. They are gradually developing into a strong artificial intelligence stage. These moving artificial intelligence machines perform cognitive functions through cameras, radar, lidar, etc.
When a cognitive function is performed through a camera, all people and objects being photographed are recorded. This filming function is already performed in most cars through vehicle black boxes. Driving a car is a business. Therefore, a vehicle black box is a portable video information processing device operated for business purposes.
However, installing and operating a car black box does not fall under any of the reasons for allowing the operation of a portable video information processing device as stipulated in Article 25-2, Paragraph 1 of the current Personal Information Protection Act. Even so, it is impossible to ban car black boxes.
Rather, it would be more desirable for the Personal Information Protection Act to establish new regulations that reflect general legal awareness. There is a need to add the following permissible reasons to Article 25-2, Paragraph 1 of the Act: ‘In cases where it is necessary to secure evidence such as compliance with the Road Traffic Act in relation to the operation of the vehicle.’
Currently, some self-driving cars have reached level 5 (the highest autonomous driving level). Self-driving cars are leading the way in the field of artificial intelligence. A drone is following behind. They all have visual functions using cameras. All artificial intelligence robots currently being developed will also perform cognitive functions through cameras.
Therefore, artificial intelligence still has visual recognition functions and will continue to do so in the future. In that respect, a moving artificial intelligence machine is equipped with a portable video information processing device. Additionally, because artificial intelligence robots are beings that perform tasks, Article 25-2 of the Personal Information Protection Act applies. In order to regulate the collection of personal information by artificial intelligence robots, reasons to allow the operation of portable video information processing devices must be added. Roughly speaking, this means allowing the operation of portable video information processing devices ‘when necessary to secure evidence such as compliance with laws and regulations related to the operation of artificial intelligence devices.’

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 김성돈, "형법각론" 성균관대학교 출판부 2009

2 배종대, "형법각론" 홍문사 2008

3 박상기, "형법각론" 박영사 2008

4 김일수, "형법각론" 박영사 2001

5 오영근, "형법각론" 박영사 2009

6 정영석, "형법각론" 법문사 1983

7 이재상, "형법각론" 박영사 2016

8 손동권, "형법각론" 율곡출판사 2004

9 김성천, "형법각론" 도서출판 소진 2023

10 장인호, "첨단과학기술사회에서 이동형영상정보처리기기 이용 확산에 따른 개인영상정보 보호방안에 관한 연구" 법학연구원 28 (28): 31-78, 2016

11 윤성현, "자율주행자동차 시대 개인정보 보호의 공법적 과제" 법과사회이론학회 (53) : 1-40, 2016

12 한희원, "인공지능(AI)의 법인격 주체성의 논리적 기틀에 대한 기초 연구" 중앙법학회 20 (20): 375-412, 2018

13 박광민 ; 백민제, "인공지능 로봇의 범죄주체성과 형사책임의 귀속" 법학연구소 20 (20): 153-178, 2017

14 계태화 ; 손승우, "이동형 영상정보 처리기기의 개인정보 보호를 위한 법·정책 개선방안" 한국보안관리학회 (69) : 1-34, 2021

15 이민형, "드론 관련 범죄 예방을 위한 법제 연구" 한국범죄심리학회 15 (15): 99-112, 2019

16 정혜욱, "개인정보보호법상의 형사처벌 규정에 관한 연구" 법학연구원 35 (35): 111-133, 2011

17 정혜욱, "AI의 책임능력" 중앙법학회 23 (23): 53-80, 2021

18 김성천, "AI와 잘 사는 법" 박영사 2023