RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      조선시대 서울에서의 상업정책과 시전(市廛) = Commercial Policy and Sijeons at Seoul in the Choson Dynasty

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101880590

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The aim of commercial policy of Seoul was to procure goods needed by the state and citizens, to maintain transactions αder and stabilize price of necessary goods, and to levy tax and corvee labor on merchants. The main burden of sijeons, as the center of commercial system of Seoul, was commercial tax in the 15th century, the procurement of commodities for the state from the 16th century, and the provision of corvee labor after the daedong law. Confucian bureaucrats were passive in absorbing commercial tax. In return sijeons had the privilege of monopoly right over the dealing of commodities. This privilege was established gradually, as sijeons’ public burden increased and the sηeons association were established. At first sijeons associated to guard their common interests. Sijeons associations were established due to the authority of state, as they had the obligations and the privilege in the 17th century. They become a guild-like institution. Though sijeons associations had internal regulations, those seldom included penal provisions on unfair or illegal trading activities, because the state had the function of maintaining transactions order. The main policy to maintain transactions order was supervision of sijeons’ commercial activities before the 16th century, protection of sijeons’ monopoly right after the 17th century for promoting sijeons, and prohibition of cornering and hoarding after the late 18th century amid the growth of Seoul market and the abuse of the monopoly right Commercial policy and sijeon associations of Seoul evolved in response the needs of the economy.
      번역하기

      The aim of commercial policy of Seoul was to procure goods needed by the state and citizens, to maintain transactions αder and stabilize price of necessary goods, and to levy tax and corvee labor on merchants. The main burden of sijeons, as the cente...

      The aim of commercial policy of Seoul was to procure goods needed by the state and citizens, to maintain transactions αder and stabilize price of necessary goods, and to levy tax and corvee labor on merchants. The main burden of sijeons, as the center of commercial system of Seoul, was commercial tax in the 15th century, the procurement of commodities for the state from the 16th century, and the provision of corvee labor after the daedong law. Confucian bureaucrats were passive in absorbing commercial tax. In return sijeons had the privilege of monopoly right over the dealing of commodities. This privilege was established gradually, as sijeons’ public burden increased and the sηeons association were established. At first sijeons associated to guard their common interests. Sijeons associations were established due to the authority of state, as they had the obligations and the privilege in the 17th century. They become a guild-like institution. Though sijeons associations had internal regulations, those seldom included penal provisions on unfair or illegal trading activities, because the state had the function of maintaining transactions order. The main policy to maintain transactions order was supervision of sijeons’ commercial activities before the 16th century, protection of sijeons’ monopoly right after the 17th century for promoting sijeons, and prohibition of cornering and hoarding after the late 18th century amid the growth of Seoul market and the abuse of the monopoly right Commercial policy and sijeon associations of Seoul evolved in response the needs of the economy.

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼