RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    데리다의 언어의 간극과 번역

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76481026

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This essay addresses the problems of the in-betweenness of language and translation as exposited by the French philosopher Jacques Derrida in his notions of l'ecriture, proper names, the tower of Babel, relevant translation, and deconstruction. I try to receive the ethico-political message of deconstruction, rethink the difference of language and translation and ask what 'the real task of the translator' is in the essay.
    Levi-Strauss's anthropological translation and his apparently value-natural descriptions of non-European cultures tend to efface the brutality of a project like colonialism, and show that the tendency to valorize speech over writing goes along with a European ethnocentrism. Taking Derrida's comments on Levi-Strauss as a point of departure, I'd like to show monolingualism may involve colonial discourse. The story of Babel is the story of the multiplication of languages. The building of the tower is meant to ensure the unity and dominance of the one people and the one language. God interrupts the colonial violence or the linguistic imperialism and ruptures the rational transparency to which the tower builders, the descendants of Shem(which literally means name) wanted to bring the world. And the replacement of the single human language with multiple, mutually incomprehensible languages means that translation becomes necessary, but perfect translation is no longer possible. If translation is necessary but there is not such a thing as the original after Babel, then how translation can be relevant without being appropriated in power-related contexts? In this point, I try to develop the Derrida's argument that the elaboration of the notion of undecid ability in deconstruction addresses the relationship between the responsibility to act and the responsibility to otherness.
    번역하기

    This essay addresses the problems of the in-betweenness of language and translation as exposited by the French philosopher Jacques Derrida in his notions of l'ecriture, proper names, the tower of Babel, relevant translation, and deconstruction. I try ...

    This essay addresses the problems of the in-betweenness of language and translation as exposited by the French philosopher Jacques Derrida in his notions of l'ecriture, proper names, the tower of Babel, relevant translation, and deconstruction. I try to receive the ethico-political message of deconstruction, rethink the difference of language and translation and ask what 'the real task of the translator' is in the essay.
    Levi-Strauss's anthropological translation and his apparently value-natural descriptions of non-European cultures tend to efface the brutality of a project like colonialism, and show that the tendency to valorize speech over writing goes along with a European ethnocentrism. Taking Derrida's comments on Levi-Strauss as a point of departure, I'd like to show monolingualism may involve colonial discourse. The story of Babel is the story of the multiplication of languages. The building of the tower is meant to ensure the unity and dominance of the one people and the one language. God interrupts the colonial violence or the linguistic imperialism and ruptures the rational transparency to which the tower builders, the descendants of Shem(which literally means name) wanted to bring the world. And the replacement of the single human language with multiple, mutually incomprehensible languages means that translation becomes necessary, but perfect translation is no longer possible. If translation is necessary but there is not such a thing as the original after Babel, then how translation can be relevant without being appropriated in power-related contexts? In this point, I try to develop the Derrida's argument that the elaboration of the notion of undecid ability in deconstruction addresses the relationship between the responsibility to act and the responsibility to otherness.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 "해체의 철학과 문학 비평 현대비평과 이론 8" 75-101, 1994

    2 "조이스의(에게 하고 싶은) 두 마디 말" 문예출판사 528-558, 1996

    3 "전이로서의 번역" 1 (1): 111-133, 2000

    4 "읽기이론 이론읽기: 라깡 데리다 크리스테바" 한신문화사 1999

    5 "에코그라피: 텔레비전에 관하여" 민음사 2002

    6 "번역과 권력 포스트식민주의 번역연구" -144,

    7 "What Is a Relevant Translation 1998" 174-98, 2001

    8 "U of Chicago P" 1981

    9 "The Task of the Translator" 69-82, 1969

    10 "The Merchant of Venice" 1955

    1 "해체의 철학과 문학 비평 현대비평과 이론 8" 75-101, 1994

    2 "조이스의(에게 하고 싶은) 두 마디 말" 문예출판사 528-558, 1996

    3 "전이로서의 번역" 1 (1): 111-133, 2000

    4 "읽기이론 이론읽기: 라깡 데리다 크리스테바" 한신문화사 1999

    5 "에코그라피: 텔레비전에 관하여" 민음사 2002

    6 "번역과 권력 포스트식민주의 번역연구" -144,

    7 "What Is a Relevant Translation 1998" 174-98, 2001

    8 "U of Chicago P" 1981

    9 "The Task of the Translator" 69-82, 1969

    10 "The Merchant of Venice" 1955

    11 "The Ear of the Other Texts and Discussions with Jacques Derrida U of Nebraska P" Lincoln 1985

    12 "Origins of Geometry U of Nebraska P" Lincoln 19621989

    13 "On Language as such and on the Language of Man Selected Writings 1: 1913 1926" Belknap 62-74, 1996

    14 "Letter to a Japanese Friend" 270-6, 19871991

    15 "Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics" Indiana UP 1997

    16 "Hear Say Yes in Joyce Acts of Literature" 256-309, 19871992

    17 "Finnegan's Wake" Penguin 1979

    18 "Difference in Translation" 165-209, 1985

    19 "Course in General Linguistics" illi (illi): 19591986

    20 "At This Very Moment in This Work Here I Am" 11-50, 19871991

    21 "A Critique of Postcolonial Reason" Harvard UP 1999

    22 ".Tristes Tropiques:An Anthropological Study of Primitive Societies in Brazil" Atheneum 1964

    23 ".The Collected Dialogues of Plato.ed.Edith Hamilton and Huntington Carins" Prinston UP 1961

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2005-05-30 학회명변경 영문명 : The Criticism And Theory Society Of Korea -> The Criticism and Theory Society of Korea KCI등재후보
    2005-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2004-11-28 학술지등록 한글명 : 비평과이론
    외국어명 : The Journal of Criticism and Theory
    KCI등재후보
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.69 0.69 0.51
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.43 0.36 1.442 0.13
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼