RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제
      • 좁혀본 항목 보기순서

        • 원문유무
        • 음성지원유무
        • 원문제공처
          펼치기
        • 등재정보
          펼치기
        • 학술지명
          펼치기
        • 주제분류
          펼치기
        • 발행연도
          펼치기
        • 작성언어

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • KCI등재

        性理學과 實學, 그 根本思考의 同異性에 대한 考察

        윤사순(Youn Sa Soon)(尹絲淳) 한림대학교 태동고전연구소 2003 泰東古典硏究 Vol.19 No.-

        Whether to regard Sung-li-hak (Neo-Confucianism: Learning of Nature and Principle) and Shilhak (Practical Learning) as two phases of a continuous development or disparate philosophies has been an unresolved question since the 1950s until today. The differentiation between the two philosophies may be enabled by a comparison of their basic concepts and premises Such is the objective of this paper, and to make the approach clear I take the thoughts of Yi Hwang and Cheong Yak-yong as the representatives of the two philosophies. Considering that Neo-Confucianism is called at times Practical Learning, we need to review the usages of the term Practical Learning which are quite different in the two philosophies. In case of Yi Hwang, the term Practical Learning is oriented toward the practicality centering on morality as opposed to Buddhism which is considered an empty discipline. In comparison, later Practical Learning considers Neo-Confucianism an empty displine, and in doing so it exhibits an even more practical, governance for the people based on law. Therefore, the two philosophies should not be confused on the mere ground of the term Practical Learning. Cheong Yak-yong refutes the basic assumptions and beliefs posited on the ground of the concepts deployed in Yi Hwang s Neo-Confucianism such as Heaven, li, chi, the mind, nature, and emotion. That is, he denies that Heaven is li. that sung(nature) is li, that one li divides into all things, that the mind integrates sung(nature) and jung (emotion), or that sung(nature) rises to become jung(emotion). As the result, in his thoughts appear new views on the universe, the humanity, or morality. This leads us to the conclusion that Practical Learning is an altogether different philosophy from Neo-Confucianism. Living at a time when concrete Neo-Confucianist studies were at their height, Cheong Yak-yong founded his early academic career in the Neo-Confucianist atmosphere, like many other Confucianist scholars of his time. He thus did not simply dismiss major Neo-Confucianist theories, but made frequent references to them. In this sense, some may argue that Cheong Yak-yong s thoughts do not differ very much from Neo-Confucianism. However, we need to remember that the implicit objective of his discourse on Neo-Confucianism was not a further development of Neo-Confucianism. Rather, his discourse aims at ending once and for all the misunderstandings and disputes about the existing Neo-Confucianist theories. Therefore, his thoughts render materials that help differentiate fundamentally Neo-Confucianism and Practical Learning. What we should not overlook as well are that Confucianism before the rise of Neo-Confucianism, namely, the notions of primitive Confucianism were accepted by both Neo-Confucianists like Yi Hwang and scholars of Practical Learning like Cheong Yak-yong, and that the formation of the school of Practical Learning took place gradually, and not suddenly with Cheong Yak-yong s solitary efforts. These facts allow us to realize that Neo-Confucianism and Practical Learning are distinct on the philosophical level, but not exactly separable from each other. The author s belief is that it is inappropriate to conceptualize the flow of philosophical development in such simplistic terms as continuity or discontinuity, for such an approach is liable to cause misunderstanding. Therefore, the rise of Practical Learning from the soil of Neo-Confucianism may be appropriately understood as a phenomenon of a change in the way of thinking by man as a subject, which took place according to the historical environment. In other words, it was a fresh philosophy (on the universe, the humanity, and morality) arrived at by such scholars as Cheong Yak-yong, based on the concepts and premises that were newly posited from an almost entire revision of the basic notions of Neo-Confucianism, i.e.,

      • KCI등재

        안향(安珦)의 성리학(性理學) 전파(傳播)와 조선성리학(朝鮮性理學)의 정향(定向)

        손흥철 ( Son Heung Chul ) 퇴계학부산연구원 2018 퇴계학논총 Vol.31 No.-

        이 논문에서 필자는 성리학을 고려에 전파한 회헌(晦軒) 안향(安珦. 1243∼1306)의 업적과 조선성리학에 끼친 학문적 영향을 연구하였다. 안향은 원(元)의 연경(燕京)에 갔을 때 성리학(性理學)에 심취하였고, 직접 주자서(朱子書)를 가지고 돌아와 성리학 연구와 교육에 열중하였다. 그 후 주자 성리학은 조선의 건국이념이 될 정도로 학문적, 역사적 의미를 지니게 되었다. 이에 회헌은 “동방주자(東方朱子)”로 칭송된다. 그러나 현재 그가 남긴 학문적 자료가 매우 적다. 따라서 이 논문에서는 그동안의 연구를 토대로 회헌의 시대인식과 성리학의 도입 과정을 비교 검토하고, 현재 전하는 자료를 통하여 회헌의 학문정신을 재조명하였다. 그리고 중국에서 성리학의 확산과정과 원나라에서의 성리학연구의 특성을 알아보았다. 다음으로 회헌의 학문정신과 교육관을 연구하였다. 회헌은 교육이 국가를 바로세우는 가장 중요한 사업이라고 강조하였다. 끝으로 회헌이 전파한 성리학이 조선의 건국이념이 되었고, 회헌의 성리학으로부터 조선성리학의 발전과정이 이미 준비되었음을 확인하였다. 그리고 회헌으로부터 서원(書院)의 문화가 시작되었다는 것도 확인하였다. 이상의 연구를 통하여 회헌의 시대정신과 그의 학문 진흥의 정신이 21세기 오늘의 시대에도 필요함을 확인하였다. 그리고 안향의 교육관을 통하여 국가와 백성의 정신적 문화적 발전을 위해 학자와 교육자의 헌신적 자세가 필요함을 확인하였다. In this paper, I studied the works of Hoeheon(晦軒) Anhyang(安珦. 1943-1306), who spread the study of Neo-confucianism to Goryeo(高麗), and the academic effects on Joseon‘s Neo-confucianism. When he went to the Yanjing(燕京) of Won(元) Dynasty, he became absorbed in Neo-confucianism and returned to Goryeo Dynasty with a book written by Zhuxi(朱熹), and he was absorbed in the study and education of Neo-confucianism. After that Neo-confucianism was then given academic and historical significance to the extent that it became the founding ideology of Joseon. Hoerheon is praised as “The eastern Zhuzi(朱子)”. But now, he has very little academic data. Accordingly, this paper reviews the introduction of Hoeheon's era perception and Neo-confucianism based on the previous studies, and reinvents Hoeheon's academic spirit through the current materials. In China, we studied the spread of Neo-confucianism studies and the characteristics of Neo-confucianism studies in the Won(元) Dynasty. Next, I studied the academic spirit and educational perspectives of Hoeheon. Hoerheon stressed that education is the most important project to establish a country correctly. Lastly, it was confirmed that Neo-confucianism, which was introduced by Hoeheon, became the founding ideology of Joseon, and that the development process of Joseon Neo-confucianism was already prepared from Hoeheon's Neo-confucianism. It also confirmed that the culture of Seowon(書院) started from Hoeheon. Through the above research, it was found that the spirit of the era and the spirit of his academic advancement were also necessary in today's 21st century. Through Anhyang's educational office, it was confirmed that the dedicated attitude of scholars and educators was necessary to develop the spiritual and cultural development of the nation and its people.

      • KCI등재

        근대 아시아의 서구문명 대응과 역사학 일본적 유학의 성립과 그 의미

        구태훈 ( Tae Hoon Koo ) 수선사학회 2012 사림 Vol.0 No.42

        This thesis examines how neo-Confucianism in Japan was accepted and developed in the Japanese society in 17th century, and how Yamaga Soko formed his own ethos appropriate for the Japanese society. In the process of this study, it was intended to naturally expose the features of Japanese society and the characteristics of Kogaku in the 17th century. The Japanese society in the 17th century, that is, the first half of Edo period, was at the time when the Confucian theory made its appearance, which is against neo-Confucianism. The tendency is obviously different from that of Chosun or China. However, this academic tendency is on the assumption of accepting and developing neo-Confucianism. I paid attention to the ethos of Soko among other Kogaku scholars. Soko is a scholar who criticized neo-Confucianism in earnest and formed his own ethos. He was fully aware of the necessity of Confucianism matching the culture and history of Japan. Soko``s confrontation with neo-Confucianism was inevitable. Examination of Soko``s ethos is one of useful methods of studying the process of Japanization. The mid 17th century was the period when the Japanese society was established. The society of Japanese samurai who were the statesmen had a distinctive political system different from that of Chosun or China. In the 17th century, secularism made its appearance, and the atmosphere to admit human desires as they were was formed in the mid 17th century. While merchants came into economic power, mammonism prevailed. In particular, Japan supremacy started to take root. Neo-Confucianism was deflected and experienced the process of resistance and troubles while passing through the prism of the Japanese society in the 17th century. The first half of 17th century was the period of learning and understanding neo-Confucianism, and the mid 17th century was the period that scholars raised question about the ethos of neo-Confucianism. As a result, neo-Confucianism could not develop into a ethos system, but was disintegrated. The disintegration process of neo-Confucianism is described as the process of Japanizing Confucianism in the history of Japan. Yamaga Soko was the first person who criticized neo-Confucianism in Japan. Soko was a scholar who had an academic background different from other Confucianists. He made Bushido an object of criticism, and Bushido is a traditional value of Japan, and made an attempt to find out ``unique Japanese things`` in the process of emphasizing that samurai of Japan are fundamentally different from statesmen of Chosun and China. While Soko subjectively understood the social order of Japan, he tried to present studies and logics appropriate for Japanese and the Japanese society. In the process, Soko criticized neo-Confucianism which is an academic study originated from other country.Soko excluded discussion out of the doctrines of Confucius who was a``sage``. He criticized that neo-Confucianism, the method of moral culture in the doctrines of Wang Yang-ming, and the method of self-discipline in Buddhism were not useful for real life. Soko``s study did not jump to the world of idea beyond the real world, and did not go deep into metaphysical discussions. Soko``s interest was based on the dimension of specific ``日用卑近``. As described above, Soko``s learning is called `` Kogaku``, which was developed by Ito Jinsai and Ogyu Sorai.

      • KCI등재

        기호성리학 연구의 과제와 전망

        이영자 ( Young Ja Lee ) 충남대학교 유학연구소 2011 유학연구 Vol.24 No.-

        The study intended to reveal the definition of Giho Neo-Confucianism and discuss the trend and task regarding previous research results. As a result, the following problem and characteristic showed in the trend of Giho Neo-Confucianism research. First, it is the problem of dichotomic category which was revealing the course of discussing the category of Giho Neo-Confucianism. The point is that the dichotomy of defining Giho Neo-Confucianism as Neo-Confucianism of Giho school which is separated from Youngnam school can have problem. Second, viewing the research result of Giho Neo-Confucianism for each individual, it focuses on partial scholars such as Han Won Jin, Lee Gan, Lim Sung Joo, Song Shi Yeol, Choi Ik Hyun, Lee Hang Ro, and etc. Because there are many scholars who are not researched, it seems that researches will still have such concentration. If researches on scholars who are not discovered yet are attempted among Giho Confucian scholars, Giho Neo-Confucianism will develop much more abundantly in quality and quantity than now. Finally, regarding research of Giho Neo-Confucianism for each subject, it showed conspicuous tendency of having discussions generally focusing on InMulSungDong-Yiron, MiBalSimCheSoonSunYooSunAk, or MyungDukJooRiJooKi. Other discussions aside to such centering discussions are necessary for discovery. According to the analysis until now, because the progress of Giho Neo-Confucianism is so diverse, its characteristic is that there is much difference in the viewpoints among scholars who study them. Such different view results from the characteristic of ``openness and diversity`` of Giho Neo-Confucianism. However, such characteristic is really necessary for harmony and development of Youngnam school and Giho school, and for Korean Confucianism (Neo-Confucianism ) to step up in the world. For Korean Neo-Confucianism to develop as world`s Neo-Confucianism, diverse discussions with different viewpoints should be actively held continually like the past. As regional studies become universally globalized breaking away from the region the more thorough its distinct characteristic is, the development of Giho Neo-Confucianism will become the development of Korean Neo-Confucianism, and it will be able to be reformed as Korean Neo-Confucianism in the world. And, furthermore, it will be able to rise up as the main stream of modern society.

      • KCI등재

        조선후기(朝鮮後期) 지식인(知識人)의 청대(淸代) 건가고증학(乾嘉考證學)에 대한 인식 연구 -한송논쟁(漢宋論爭)을 中心으로-

        정신남 ( Chennan Ding ) 연세사학연구회 2015 學林 Vol.36 No.-

        This study aims at clarifying understanding of Philology of the Qianlong-Jiaqing, Qing Dynasty of China by intellectuals in the late Chosun dynasty Korea. Philology of the Qianlong-Jiaqing, as an independent academic system representing academic features of Qing Dynasty, is knowledge combined with philology methodology and unique argumentation philosophy, i.e. the new philosophy of Qianlong-Jiaqing. Intellectuals with the background of new argumentation of Qianlong-Jiaqing used rigorous research methods and expounded several key words in Confucianism, trying to undermine the authority of Neo-Confucianism since Song Dynasty, and to establish an argumentation philosophy system with a special feature. At that time, the controversy between Philology and Neo-Confucianism broke out between the intellectuals of Philology of the Qianlong-Jiaqing (Han) who regarded themselves as inheritors of the knowledge in Han Dynasty essence and called their knowledge “Hanxue” and the intellectuals who supported Neo-Confucianism. The controversy spread to Korean academia and sparked a huge debate. The author firstly introduces the historical background and the necessity of the research, then expounds previous research as well as the view angle and research method of this thesis. The end of 18th century and the first half of 19th century is a transitional period from pre-modern to modern, in which period Philology of the Qianlong-Jiaqing, as one branch of Confucianism, occupied an important place in academic history of both China and Korea. As for research perspective and method, the author classifies Korean intellectuals’ understanding of Philology of the Qianlong-Jiaqing, then focuses on their specific knowledge, with controversy between Philology and Neo-Confucianism centered. Korean intellectuals strictly separate Sinology of Han Dynasty and Qing Dynasty, i.e. Qing knowledge represented by Philology of the Qianlong-Jiaqing. They acknowledged the preservation and inheritance of the essence and the accuracy of the notes of Sinology of Han Dynasty. However, they fiercely criticized the disadvantage of detachment from reality and buried in philological research. For those Korean intellectuals who advocate Neo-Confucianism, it was an academic decline and times anxiety since prevalence of Philology of the Qianlong-Jiaqing was contributing to the authority decline of Neo-Confucianism. In addition, even though the Korean intellectuals acknowledge the achievement of new argumentation school, they showed vigilance since the clear anti-Zhu zi trend on argumentation. The reason why Korean intellectuals criticized new argumentation school was they, as the ruling class of the country with the ruling ideology of Neo-Confucianism, could not stand the power of Neo-Confucianism, i.e. Korean ideology challenged by Philology of the Qianlong-Jiaqing on the basis of research results. It is not an easy task to introduce Philology of the Qianlong-Jiaqing into Korea because of its anti-Neo-Confucianism trend. Korean intellectuals proposed Compromise of Han and Song in face of the prevalence of Philology of the Qianlong-Jiaqing. It is a comeback of exploration of Confucianism spirit in Korean culture, and a try to compromise Neo-Confucianism and Philology of the Qianlong-Jiaqing. In conclusion, this study illustrates Korean intellectuals’ specific knowledge of philology of the Qianlong-Jiaqing, at the same time, on the basis of it, expounded the detailed information of compromise of Philology and Neo-Confucianism proposed by them in order to introduce the philology of the Qianlong-Jiaqing. The purpose of the study is to be of some assistance on the future research on Korean’s reception history of philology of the Qianlong-Jiaqing.

      • KCI등재

        원 간섭기 성리학 수용의 일 단면 -최문도(崔文度)를 중심으로-

        고혜령 ( He Ryung Koh ) 한국중세사학회 2005 한국중세사연구 Vol.0 No.18

        This paper examines a scholar during the days when Neo-Confucianism from the Yuan Dynasty was first adopted late in the Goryeo Dynasty. People say that Neo-Confucianism was generally relevant to newly rising officials from the countryside, small and medium-sized landowners or Kwago(科擧), the highest level state examination to recruit ranking officials. When we pay attention to the different groups of people who studied Neo-Confucianism, however, we can see that classes from different backgrounds also studied Neo-Confucianism The people who accepted Neo-Confucianism in the last Goryeo Dynasty were from not only the rising class but also from existing powerful families or scholars who did not apply for Kwago. In this paper I will focus on Choi Moon-doh (1292-1345) to consider one aspect of Neo-Confucianism. He served as Soogwi(宿衛), an official rank in the Yuan dynasty. Choi Moon-doh`s family was a powerful family who had served as high officials, carrying on the family line. His father, Choi Sung-ji, who passed Kwago, raised up to Chansungsa(贊成事) supporting the King C uingsun(忠宣王)and also played a great role in introducing the calendar of Yuan Dynasty. Choi Moon-doh was sent to Yuan to serve as Soogwi, but had been interested in Neo-Confucianism through studying the works of Ju Don-i(주돈신), Jung Ho(程顥), Jung Ei(정신) and Joo Hee(朱熹). After coming back to Goryeo, he was recognized as a scholar of Neo-Confucianism through interchange with Lee Jae-hyun(李齊腎), Choi Hae(崔瀣) and Lee Kok(李穀) who were prominent at that time. Also Uwi Moon-doh, who played an important part in the acceptance of Neo-Confucianism, stood at the head of popularizing the exercises of Neo-Confucianism by setting up the family shrine(家廟), and promoting the spread of Too-ho(投壺). The family shrine and Too-ho were continuously kept, even in the Chosun Dynasty, as a fundamental formality and amusement of the literati. In this paper, we may glance at the diversity of people who accepted Neo-Confucianism late in the Goryeo Dynasty through the activity of Choi Moon-doh and other scholar`s consciousness on his view of Neo-Confucianism. In addition, it was revealed that Neo-Confucianism was not an exclusive possession of the new literati class but it was spread to a wide-range of classes in the process of cultural exchanges between Goryeo and Yuan. It is unfortunate however that it was not easy to reveal the level of his understanding of Neo-Confucianism owing to the lack of concrete historical material.

      • KCI등재

        베트남 儒學思想 形成過程의 特徵 - 麗末鮮初 儒學 鼎立過程과의 比較를 통하여

        최복희 한국유교학회 2009 유교사상문화연구 Vol.35 No.-

        본 논문은 조선과 베트남 사회에서 성리학 사상이 도입되는 과정에서의 유사한 역사적 정치적 배경을 지적하고, 수용의 과정에서의 다른 점을 분석하려는 시도이다. 작은 결론으로 필자는 베트남과 조선에서 성리학의 성격의 공통점과 차이점을 정리해보았다. 첫째, 조선과 베트남 공히 성리학은 통치철학으로 도입되었다. 통치세력에게 있어서 성리학은 통치이데올로기로서 왕조의 정치력을 강화하기 위한 이념의 전파와 의례 장악의 수단이었다. 특히 통치세력이 실제로는 유교적 신념을 형성하지 못하면서 단지 수단으로 여겨졌다는 점이 공통적인 정황이었다. 둘째, 베트남과 조선의 경우 모두 조정의 정치적 의도에 의한 문화 수용으로 이루어졌기 때문에, 처음에는 문화양식으로서의 예로만 주목되었다는 점이 공통점이었다. 그러나, 이것은 양자 사이의 차이를 만드는 계기가 되었다. 조선의 경우에는 성리학은 예의 측면에서 일상공간에서 문화적 신념과 양식으로 구체화되었던 반면, 베트남의 경우에 성리학은 향촌의 유력한 기존 지도자들이 전통 관습들을 고수하고자 하는 경향이 강하였기 때문에 사회적으로 잘 받아들여지지 못하였다. 베트남에서 예의 성리학적 개념은 잘 인지되지 못하여 형식적인 수준에서 이해되었으며, 특히 상대적으로 강한 전통관념과 불교사상은 성리학을 베트남 사회가 받아드리는데 큰 장애가 되었다. 셋째, 조선과 베트남은 모두 고대의 공맹(孔孟)의 유학이 일찍부터 전래되었고, 그 후 통치세력의 필요에 의하여 성리학적 통치이념이 도입되었다. 이후, 성리학적 통치이념은 양국 통치세력들의 정치적 이해관계를 위해 적극적으로 채택되었다. 이러한 공통의 역사적 도입과정에도 불구하고, 조선의 성리학은 이전부터 유학의 이론적이고 실천적인 토대를 형성해온 반면, 베트남의 경우 전통적 유학이 베트남 고유의 강한 전통과 관습의 벽을 넘어서지 못하였다. 이러한 도입 초기의 차이는 양국 간 성리학적 특성의 차이로 이어졌다. 넷째, 조선과 베트남에서 모두 성리학 사상은 불교사상을 견제해야 하는 과제를 지니고 있었다. 하지만 상이한 전통과 관습은 그 과제의 상이한 결과를 야기하였다. 조선의 경우에 성리학이 통치철학과 도덕규범의 강력한 정치사회적 이론으로 성립하는 동안 불교는 점차 종교적 역할의 수준에 머물게 되었다. 그러나, 베트남의 경우, 사찰이 출세간의 신성한 영역뿐만 아니라, 조정 관료들의 정치활동 공간 기능을 했던 예처럼, 이미 불교가 입세적 성격을 강하게 가지고 있었기 때문에 현실주의적 사회가치인 유학이 새롭게 차지할 수 있는 이념적이고 사회적인 공간이 남아있지 않았다. 오히려 베트남 사회에서는 유학의 가족윤리와 예(禮) 사상보다 불교의 자비의 윤리가 더 자연스럽게 받아들여졌다. This paper studies the common and different characteristics of the neo-Confucianism between Vietnam and Chosun by analyzing the similarities and differences in the historical and political backgrounds of the ideological formation of those two different forms of the neo-Confucianism. With this academic work, this paper concludes in four terms. Firstly, in both Vietnam and Chosun, the neo-Confucianism was introduced as a ruling philosophy. For the ruling groups in both countries, the neo-Confucianism was regarded as an effective ideological and ethical means to consolidate the its domination power over the country. The ruling groups in both countries only dealt with the neo-Confucianism as an ideological means for political aims while failing to establish it as a form of religious belief. Secondly, in both countries, the neo-Confucianism was adopted as 'courtesy(禮)', a Confucian culture pattern to dominate people by the ruling group in its initial time. This led to make some differences in the neo-Confucianism between Vietnam and Chosun, however. Whereas the neo-Confucianism was materialized as a form of cultural belief and mode in the Chosun society, the Vietnamese one was hardly accommodated in its society for leaders in its local communities strongly held fast to their traditional values and customs. In addition, the neo-Confucian notion of courtesy was not clearly conceptualized, but its form was only considered in the Vietnamese intellectual field. In particular, the relatively powerful traditional values and Buddhism functioned as a heavy obstacles for the neo-Confucianism to permeate into the Vietnam society. Thirdly, the traditional Confucianism was introduced into both Vietnam and Chosun in their early history. Afterwards, the neo-Confucian ruling ideology was imported by the ruling groups for their political interests in both countries. Despite their common historical background, the Chosun Confucianism had its own pre-constituted theoretical and practical foundation while the social base of the Vietnam one was significantly weaker than the social influence of its tradition and customs. This initial difference resulted in each country's unique characteristics of the neo-Confucianism. Lastly, the neo-Confucianism in both countries was given a fundamental task to check the traditional Buddhism. However, different traditions and customs resulted in different effects. In Chosun, while the neo-Confucianism developed as a powerful politico-social theory of the ruling philosophy and the moral criteria, the general role and effects of the Buddhism was limited within a religious level. Unlike Chosun, there was very little ideological or social space left for the newly introduced neo-Confucianism, which was very realistic, because the Vietnam Buddhism had a wordly success-oriented tendency in Vietnam. For example, a Vietnam Buddhist temple was functioning not only as a sacred area of Buddhism, but also an actual sphere for the political elite's negotiations. Rather, in the Vietnamese society, the Buddhist moral idea of benevolence was more popular and acceptable than the Confucian family ethics and thought of courtesy.

      • KCI등재

        아나키즘의 윤리관과 전통 윤리관의 만남 및 변용 -한국 근대의 경험을 중심으로-

        김갑수 ( Kab Sou Kim ) 한국철학사상연구회 2007 시대와 철학 Vol.18 No.1

        In the early modern age, most of the anarchist were at the negative statue about Neo-Confucianism which was the main ideology of the Chosun dynasty. First of all, the theoretician anarchists started to separate Neo-Confucianism from the traditional ethics. In their eyes, Neo-Confucianism seemed to be the very ethical system which had destroyed Chosun. They considered Neo-Confucianism as a toadyish ethical system without subjectivity. The anarchists thought Neo-Confucianism only compels the people to blindly be obedient. That`s why they tried to expel Neo-Confucianism from the state of the tradition. Instead of Neo-Confucianism, they wanted to restore the Korean tradition with original ideology and ethics of Korean. Of the many anarchists, Sin-ChaeHo criticized the negative Confucian slave-like ethics such as weakness, obedience. And at the same time, he actively tried to spread resistant and revolutional ethics. Especially, he tried to construct the new ethics with the basis of original Korean Nang-Ga-Thought. His article The declaration of Chosun revolution which has strongly influenced for Korean anarchism has the point of the people`s revolution. Sin-ChaeHo believed that people`s self-awakening and revolution is the only way to rescue Korean people from colonial status. He said there are two ways that people who live in colonial period can choose. The first way is to live as exploited pauper with obedience and slavery ethics. The second way is to get the liberation choosing resistance and revolutional ethics. Sin-ChaeHo persisted that those ways and the consequences only depend on the people`s own consciousness and choice. There are another worthy anarchists that we need to pay attention. Lee-Jungkyu criticized the anti-democracy, toadyism, empty formalities and vanity of Neo-Confucianism. However, at the same time, he highly respected the original Confucian ethical spirit. He tried to analyze and accept the original Confucian ethics of Confucius or Mengzi as the way of anarchism. Another important anarchist Ha-GeeLak was critical to traditional Neo-Confucianistic ethics as Sin-ChaeHo or Lee-Jungkyu did. He thought that Neo-Confucianism is the harmful theoretical basis justifying and fixing a status system. He thought that Neo-Confucianism is the ethics for conquerors and the exploit, not for the public. For Ha-GeeLak, the power resisting against the governing class was the expression of anarchism, and he thought that the basis of this power is very similar to original Korean tradition. According to these kind of thoughts, Neo-Confucianism in Chosun are not the original Korean ideology, but the borrowed ideology chosen by the governing class for the stable conquering. The anarchists persisted that the resistance and the struggle are essential to get liberty from the colonial status. And the anarchists thought that the very subject of the resistance and the struggle has to be the public. The anarchists tried to get the liberation utilizing original Korean ideology. Every theoretical anarchists denied Neo-Confucianism, however, some parts of the original Confucian ethics such as Confucius or Mengzi were ardently accepted in anarchism. Though there are no much theoretical anarchists, we need to concentrate on the point that most of them started their theories of anarchism from the anarchistic explanation of the traditional ethical system.

      • SCOPUSKCI등재

        Academic Trends within Nineteenth-Century Korean Neo-Confucianism

        ( Noh Kwan Bum ) 서울대학교 규장각한국학연구원 2016 Seoul journal of Korean studies Vol.29 No.1

        This article seeks to offer a broad examination of the historical trajectory of Neo-Confucian thought in the Chosǒn Dynasty of the nineteenth century. In so doing, the article aspires to go beyond the pre-established view of equating Neo-Confucianism with the conservative wijǒng ch’ǒksa (“upholding orthodoxy, rejecting heterodoxy”) movement. First, attention will be paid to the fact that sequels to some of the most authoritative Neo-Confucian texts, such as the Reflections on Things at Hand (Jinsi lu) and Elementary Learning (Sohak), continued to appear in the Chosǒn period. The publication of sequels to Reflections was part of a trend to establish a canon by systematizing the Korean Neo-Confucian tradition within the format of the Reflections, and thereby situate Korean Neo-Confucianism as the succeessor of the Neo-Confucian canons of the Six Classics, Four Books, and Reflections. The publication of the sequels to Elementary Learning was part of a trend to popularize Korean Neo-Confucianism by organizing it within the format of the Elementary Learning and thus propagate Neo-Confucian ethics throughout the various strata of society. If these sequels were efforts to systematize the tradition of Korean Neo-Confucianism in a scholarly format, the encounter of Korean Neo-Confucianism with modernity led to undertakings that sought to engage with this new reality through the production of the Kugyǒng yǒnǔi (Extensive exposition of the Nine Canons). In this work, we can identify attempts by Korean Neo- Confucianists to communicate with the contemporary currents of modernity. This article reflects on the historical significance of the academic trends of nineteenth-century Korean Neo-Confucianism, which can be characterized as canonization, popularization, and contemporization. It thus seeks to overcome the wijǒng ch’ǒksa framework and give justice to the changes that Korean Neo-Confucianism underwent during this period.

      • KCI등재

        신유학의 정좌법과 심신수렴의 유교치료

        신현승 ( Hyun Seung Shin ) 한국동서철학회 2016 동서철학연구 Vol.0 No.80

        Confucianism (Especially, Neo-Confucianism) was the most important traditional humanities in East Asia with very active interests in the relationship between the human body and mind, action and function of the mind, and method of cultivating the mind. In addition, the nature of Confucianism itself is therapeutic and curative. Also, Jingzuo (quiet sitting) as a therapy is one of the methods of psychosomatic moral culture proposed by Neo-Confucian scholars in the Song dynasty of China, which refers to realizing one’s own nature by calming oneself and having an attitude of ‘unmoved in absolute stillness’. In other words, Jingzuo was widely known as a method of psychosomatic convergence or psychosomatic moral culture in Neo-Confucianism (Confucianism after the Song dynasty including Daoxue). Of the Beisong-Wuzi (five great thinkers of Beisong) who contributed to the birth of Neo-Confucianism, Ercheng (the Cheng brothers) taught the importance of Jingzuo, and compiler of Neo-Confucianism, Zhu Xi, too, was very positive about the Confucian method of moral culture of Jingzuo. This method of moral culture is suggested as a method of sitting-in Zen meditation or taking care of one’s health not only in Neo-Confucianism (Zhuxiism and Yangmingism, etc.) but also in Buddhism or Taoism. Accordingly, there has been constant criticism that this method of moral culture is too Zen Buddhist in and out of the world of Confucianism. Thus, this paper focused on investigating the Confucian therapeutic significance of the Jingzuo method and psychosomatic convergence in Neo-Confucianism. In other words, the first part of the main discourse of this study reviewed the Jingzuo method and various discussions about mind and body in Neo-Confucianism, the aspects of the Jingzuo method, an important method of psychosomatic moral culture in Neo-Confucianism and Neo-Confucian scholars’ psychosomatic convergence and its curative significance. In addition, the second chapter discussed eminent Confucianist, Jishan Liu Zongzhou’s Jingzuo theory and meaning of psychosomatic healing, characteristics of Jishan Jingzuo theory and Liu Zongzhou’s discourse about the relationship between psychosomatic healing and Jingzuo, who made a finale of the history of Confucianism in the Ming dynasty the history of Yangmingism in the Ming dynasty before the prosperity of Kaozhengxue in Qing dynasty.

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼