RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제
      • 좁혀본 항목 보기순서

        • 원문유무
        • 음성지원유무
        • 원문제공처
        • 등재정보
        • 학술지명
        • 주제분류
        • 발행연도
          펼치기
        • 작성언어
        • 저자
          펼치기

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • KCI등재
      • KCI등재
      • KCI등재

        일본정부의 청일전쟁 개전 논의와 그 성격

        최석완(Choi, Suk-Wan) 효원사학회 2014 역사와 세계 Vol.- No.46

        This article examines the validity of a recent new theory which defines the character of the Japanese Government`s East Asia policy from the Meiji Restoration to Sino-Japanese War as non-expansionism. In particular, this article analyzes the discussion held in Japanese Government regarding the issue of the outbreak of the war in the middle of July in 1894. the results are as follows. The controversy within the Japanese Government was not about whether Japan should start the war or not, but rather, it was a problem of the active or the passive outbreak of the war. Ito Hirobumi, Mutsu Munemitsu and the military authorities insisted on the active outbreak of the war. They considered that the possibility of Russia`s interference in the Sino-Japanese War would be low and prompted the early outbreak of the war. On the other hand, the emperor Meiji and Cabinet members who insisted on the passive outbreak of the war considered the possibility of Russia`s interference would be high. Therefore, they carefully looked for an external and ostensible reason necessary for the outbreak of the war. However, they did not deny the policy on the outbreak of the war set in the middle of June. On the other hand, Ito, Mutsu, and the military authorities took the initiative in the outbreak of the war policy, but had never violated the dogmatism which was to ignore the decision of the Japanese Government`s policy. Based on this analysis, it can be concluded that this new theory is not persuasive enough to replace the conventional theory.

      • KCI등재

        70년 이후 유대-기독교의 동향

        정기문 효원사학회 2017 역사와 세계 Vol.- No.52

        유대-기독교는 기독교 수립 초기는 다수파였지만, 70년 이후 소수파로 전략하게 된다. 70년 유대 반란이 실패하면서 유대성을 추구하는 것이 위험한 것으로 인식되었고, 기독교 내의 인적 구성이 점차 이방인 중심으로 변경되었기 때문이다. 사도계열이 주도파로 등장하고, 바울파가 세력을 확대하려고 노력하는 가운데, 유대-기독교는 이들에 맞서서 노선 투쟁을 벌었다. 이 논문을 이들이 생산한 문서인 유대계 복음서들과 야고보서, 그리고 영지주의 계열의 문서를 중심으로 유대-기독교의 동향을 살펴보았다. 그 결과 이들은 예루살렘 교회의 소멸 이후 시리아 쪽으로 이주한 집단이고, 1세기 후반 2세기 초반에 여전히 상당한 세력을 가지고 있었음을 확인하였다. 이들은 주의 형제 야고보를 최고 지도자로 제시하면서 사도 계열의 교회와 맞섰고, 유대 율법의 준수를 주장하면서 바울파의 성장을 억제하고자 하였다. 또한 일부는 1세기 말에 유행하였던 영지주의를 수용하여 계속적인 생존을 모색하였다. In the aftermath of the Jewish War in 70 A.D, the Jerusalem church was extinct and the Jewish Christians suffered a great blow. The circumcision group which were hard-liners of the Jerusalem church were destroyed and the cause that the Jewish Christians pursued got greatly injured. Because the Jewish revolt was failed, it was considered dangerous to pursue 'Jewishness' actively. Moreover, as the majority of Christians gradually had been changed to Romans, the position of Jewish Christianity had been reduced day by day. This paper examined the strategies Jewish Christianity used to survive after 70 A.D. through the document they made. As a result, three major trends were confirmed. First, after the extinction of the Church of Jerusalem, some of the groups who followed James, the brother of the Jesus, moved to Syria and Egypt. They had maintained their own faith by creating the Gospel of Hebrews, the Gospel of Nazarenes, and the Gospel of the Ebionites. They continued to follow the Law of Jews and rituals. Second, Jewish Christians was in conflict with the successors of Paul. Nurturing their power in the 80s, Paul's successors insisted that they should not have to keep the Law of Jews. Against this, Jewish Christians attacked Paul as a false apostle, and continued to insist on the necessity of following the Law of Jews to fellow Christians. This flow is observed in the Gospel of Matthew and the letter of James. Third, a group of believers who pursued Gnosticism in Christianity was found in the late first century. Against the growth of the followers of Apostles, they argued that James, Thomas, and Mary Magdalene had received special revelations. They formed a separate denomination by accepting Gnosticism. They produced several documents of the Nag Hammadi library.

      • KCI등재
      • KCI등재
      • KCI등재
      • KCI등재
      • KCI등재후보

        동아시아 율령네트워크의 형성과 律令體系 : 唐·日本·高麗의 律令格式 비교 연구

        전영섭(Jun Young-Seop) 효원사학회 2012 역사와 세계 Vol.- No.41

        In this paper the formation of the network according to the statute of the East Asian countries included in the domains considered in Goryeo and Japan as in the Original laws and Import laws and convergence through contact with Tang Dynasty's laws of each country's legal system through analysis of the structure came review your. China's Statute was compiled by the Gaehwang Statute, Jeonggwan Statute, Younghwi Statute and Gaewon 25 years Statute. Statute of the period, separated by a criminal and administrative law as to the compilation, Statute has already been established, partly since it does not change. To amend the Statute, the Statute re-create the former, should be abolished. Statute was compiled in the Goryeo Dynasty. The publication process that follows. King Seongjong accepted the Tang Dynasty's Statute. And the Statute when it is necessary to modify or supplement, respectively, of the Statute to review the content and then respond to it in a variety of provisions that were promulgated in the form. Thus, independent Statute made by the Goryeo Dynasty were determined. Statute of Japan the geungangryeong, daeboryeong, ranging from yangnoryeonge was compiled in the course of a series of. Of this Statute, Statute of the Daebo Statute accepted the Statute of the Tang dynasty, it became independent. Yangnoryeongt is slightly modified and supplemented. Goryeo Dynasty, and Japan accepted the Statute of the Statute of the party, gradually undergoing a process of organizing it is that. This process was the formation of a network of East Asia Statute. For each dynasty, even though there are some differences that period was the middle of the 11th century.

      • KCI등재

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼