한국의 다문화 연구 현황과 과제

박경하 한국중앙사학회 2011 중앙사론 Vol.0 No.33

Multi-culturalism is the idea confronted to integration policies of the nation-state based on the assimilation claiming one culture, language, and nation. This is a public declaration presupposing the establishment of a national management model on cultural diversity. In only cultural diversity, human rights and freedoms of the individual and collective can increase, creative energy can display, and confirming and continuing philosophy and public norms can be led to truly social integration. Multi-culturalism can be deployed as very flexible and broad interpretation in terms of terms containing a variety of responses on the multi-cultural situations. For these reasons, the research on multi-culturalism becomes often a prerequisite theoretical acceptance the results of a case in most foreign countries. And based on this, because multi-cultural studies in Korea society are making progress, theoretical research has gone into a full-fledged orbit than in the past. In reality, of course, the quest for multi-cultural education and multi-cultural society is still low, however also, it will be carried out intensive research in academia. Underlying this view, by more intensify a variety of cultural characteristics the Korea society today embracing, it is because the judge they will proceed the process investigate and enunciate causes in the history of Korea. Overall, tendencies on Korea's multi-culturalism or multi-cultural research are firstly based on a theoretical framework centering the first overseas cases, and second, specific research on historical review or investigation are trifle, but continue, and products of research accumulated in terms of language education, literature, social welfare are the most prominent. Research and practical steps on related to multi-culturalism in current Korea society has been emphasized as social welfare aspects backed up in the reality. Because of this reason, multi-cultural society of Korea might be progressed without a solid theoretical foundation. From ancient times to the present day, because of the reason, because it is first works lightening and enunciating a variety of cultural layers accepted and applied in Korea society that you can see the work first, how to solve issues of power such as gender, class, surrounding, and group and obscured under a single national identity? It is urgent challenge needed in the liberalization and globalization era.

“프랑스 북부 지역 고딕 성당 탐방” 2006년 2월 8일~ 2006년 2월 28일

한국중앙사학회 한국중앙사학회 2006 중앙사론 Vol.23 No.-

중앙유치원의 근대 유아교육사상 위상

김형목 한국중앙사학회 2010 중앙사론 Vol.0 No.32

Chung-Ang kindergarten, a representative of the time was founded by Park Huido and Yu Yangho in 1916. It has been regarded as a leading model of the pre-school education, along with Ehwa kindergarten. Attached school for kindergarten teacher contributed to a better and high-quality education. At the beginning of its open, it was not successful for lack of understanding of the pre-school education. And the zeal for children's education and the difficulty of entering school were another reasons to hinder its development. In other words, it was only regarded as a ‘prep school’ for elementary school. It didn't grow smoothly due to the nature of the colonial time. And it was temporarily closed because of some conflict of the management rights. (but) various activities of its supporters association by people from all walks of life set up its long term plan for its forward progress. Especially, events such as opera(歌 劇) and dance routine and recreation(律動遊戱) increased people's attention to the kindergarten education. Some activities such as making Children's day became the foundation for the founding movement of kindergarten nationwide in 1920s. Chung-Ang kindergarten was one of the leaders of the wave. the department of kindergarten teachers developed into Chung-Ang children's care school and it vitalized children's education by professional teachers with progressive educational theories. The reason for focused Chung-Ang kindergarten is here.

조선후기 향촌사회사와 우인 김용덕 선생

이해준 한국중앙사학회 2008 중앙사론 Vol.28 No.-

This study aimed to remember and pay tribute to the scholarship and virtue of the late Kim, Yong-deok who left great achievements in research on history of the later Joseon society and history of thoughts. The study mainly discussed the history of Hyangchon society and the matters of village organization. Uin Kim, Yong-deok's research achievements include about 30 theses and 10 books on various themes including "Research on History of Thought of the Late Joseon Period,"(1997), "Research on Hyangcheong"(1978), Research on History of Korean System"(1983), "Research on Hyangyak of the Late Joseon Period"(1990) and " The New Exploration of Korean History"(1992). His research has sometimes caused lots of controversy because of his views as a precursor and lots of questions addressed in the research. His research as a whole focused on issues that failed to attract people's attention. Kim, Yong-deok's outstanding ability in research on history of Hyangchon society is well displayed through the followings: (1) the process of change in Hyangcheong, (2) differentiation between Hyangyak and Hyanggyu, (3) the definitions of Donggye (Sanghahapgye) and Juhyeon Hyangyak and (4) defining Chongye. Mr. Kim organized Hyangyak research team mainly composed of students doing PH.D. course at Chungang graduate school and invited relevant researchers every month. Through discussions with the researchers, he showed lots of interest in village community organization and living culture and, as a result, wrote 『Research on Hyangyak of the Late Joseon Era』(Mineumsa, 1990). However, as he revealed his willingness to perceive culture surrounding Korean history based on 'Cheongye,' his interest shifted from Hyangyak and Hyanggyu to Chongye, a village community organization when he became old. Noting that Chongye, an autonomous organization of traditional village played a crucial role in inheriting Korean culture, he emphasized that Chongye embodies the history of autonomous and cooperative community. In conclusion, Kim, Yong-deok's academic activities have led down to research on history of Hyangchon society. It is also noteworthy that the theses of his PH.D. students all pioneered research into history of Hyangchon society.

朝鮮總督府 建物에 대한 硏究 - 文樣을 중심으로 -

趙容重 한국중앙사학회 1998 중앙사론 Vol.10-11 No.-

元 大都의 高麗寺院

송재웅 한국중앙사학회 2006 중앙사론 Vol.23 No.-

강요된 미국화인 미국 적색공포(1919~1920)의 성격에 관한 소고

김형곤 한국중앙사학회 1999 중앙사론 Vol.12-13 No.-

산운 장도빈의 고구려인식

박인호 한국중앙사학회 2009 중앙사론 Vol.30 No.-

This article aimed to examine Jang Do-bin's Cognition of Goguryeo period. Jang Do-bin had followed the periodization which divided into Sanggo, Joonggo, Geungo, Geunsei and Choegeun and he had cognized Goguryeo period as Joonggo. In the early stage of the historiography of the Korean history, he described with focus on Kings and persons and he didn't escape category of the traditional historiography of dynasty-centered which was developed into the Ring stage, the Growth stage, Climax stage and Down fall stage of Goguryeo. The sentence has a limit of the historiography on traditional ages by indignation and exaggerated expression. Jang Do-bin dealed with Goguryeo period giving a full explanation relatively among total periods. Choi Nam-Sun who was a culturist among another culturists took small pages of Goguryeo period and its contents were shown as a meager in substance. In the case of Hwang Ui-don's Cognition of Goguryeo period, he took to concentrate upon modern times and his description of Goguryeo were left relatively poor pages. Jang Do-bin understood the growth and expansion of Goguryeo owing to peoples' characters of Goguryeo, peoples' solidarity, pursuing the policy of militarism, diligent and simple lifestyle, educational spirit of pursing to be both a good warrior and a good scholar and the way of strict ruling. On the other hand, he cognized that the downfall of Goguryeo was brought by aggression of some external powers, peoples' change into extravagance in living and despotism by militarism and respect of warrior only. After liberation from Japanese Imperialism in 1945, he showed an changing attitude that emphasized internal forces than external forces relating to downfall of Goguryeo. Jang Do-bin regarded the history of Goguryeo period as the most important period in the Korean history and then he understood the developing of Sanggo history as Goguryeo -centered in DongBuk Asia international order of the 4th-7th century. He described that Great persons of King Kwanggaeto, Euljimundeok and Gaesomun had acted to defence Goguryeo against external several invations and they had served to preserve a nation. Sin Chae-ho who had cognition of Goguryeo-centered, understood Korean history as a struggle history against invasion of external powers. But Jang Do-bin emphasized that the overcoming abilities than the struggle attitudes of Goguryeo against external invasion. For example, he described to emphasis King Pyeongwon' and King Yeongyang' overcoming abilities against external invasion. Furthermore, he suggested that the growth and expansion of Goguryeo dynasty owed to increase of peoples, expansion of territory, maintenance of military power and system and some excellent cultural contents and system. Jang Do-bin thought in sake of the preeminence of the culture with the cause why Goguryeo was able to build the most powerful nation during the early days, and he thought that culture development and national development made ends meet together. In the viewpoint of culturism, Jang Do-bin described that the culture of Goguryeo had some excellent substance than the culture of Silla dynasty. and Silla dynasty imported the essence of the culture of Goguryeo dynasty. The emphasis for such Goguryeo culture came to show the drawing and the photograph of the real spot survey writing the history textbook titled Pyeongyangji. As a result, He develop the historiography in Korean history from documents-centered description to utilizing the drawing and the photograph.

漢代를 중심으로 본 치하책과 치하사업

정창원 한국중앙사학회 2009 중앙사론 Vol.30 No.-

Economists of modern societies recognize close relationship between social overhead capital(SOC) investment and development, growth of local area including state development progress. Thus, SOC is one of major factors for evaluation of a country's competitiveness and development level. SOC plays important role in development of a nation and the standard of living of its people. Therefore, SOC facilities are directly linked to a nation's industrial competitiveness and they are must-have facilities when it comes to state governance and maintenance. Historically, in each stage of ancient empires, modern states, imperialism and colonialism, construction and operation of certain SOC facilities must have been required to meet the demands of the particular stage's governance. Mankind has been not only using the natural resources but also improving the nature. With these nature improvements, human races tried to streamline governing of their nations. These were recorded in the pages of history as various types of SOC investment. Natural environment closely assimilates into military, politics, economy situation and SOC is functioning in promoting this process. Construction of SOC facilities in history is a good example of nature improvements by mankind. Particularly, when a strong state establishes, governing organization of the country actively participate in SOC investment as a way of state management and most of times, these investments were appeared as massive civil engineering works. Ancient empires followed the same procedures. In accordance with overall situation of the era, certain investment for public facility construction is required to the government or leading organization and it causes various changes to the society. By analyzing public facility construction of the generation, we can observe historical meanings in terms of cultural and social environment of the era which was necessary at that time. In this chapter, we will study major river control projects and relevant policies insisted and executed by various figures of Han Dynasty to analysis how public facility construction worked in the process of state governance and management in ancient Chinese empire. Investment for public facility construction takes large part of administration and management of a modern society these days as well. For these reasons, by analyzing types, effects and understanding of the governing party as per SOC facility construction in each stage (ancient empires, modern states, colonial period) of a state, we can observe what kinds of relationship is existing between SOC construction and nation management and governing and that is the purpose of this study.

북간도 간민회의 해산과 추이

박걸순 한국중앙사학회 2009 중앙사론 Vol.30 No.-

The dissolution of Ganminhoe(墾民會) of China on March 1914 failed the self-government trial of the Korean in Bookgando(北間島). Nevertheless, the Korean never stopped trying to organize following organization. They wanted to make self-government real and solve the problems like education and unemployment. After the dissolution of Ganminhoe the Korean tried to make Korean organization until 1919 when they made Daehan-Gookminhoe(大韓國民會) and this reflects their will. We used to understand that the reason of the dissolution of Ganminhoe were the confrontation and conflict between Ganminhoe, Nongmuhoe(農務會) and Gonggyohoe(孔敎會), but we can see the fundamental reason was the interest between China and Japan. The final source was the submission of China by the pressure of the imperialist Japan. After the dissolution of Ganminhoe, the Korean tried to succeed it. They made the following new organization or reorganized and united the affiliated organization of Ganminhoe. First of all, Maningye(萬人契) started its operation. Second, Jang-up-hoe(獎業會) stood up for the prohibition of any political behavior and for the unemployment and education. Jang-up-hoe tried to unite Ganminhoe and Nongmuhoe and expand its territory. They couldn't get the formal authorization, however, because of the pressure of the imperialist Japan. Dongjehoe(同濟會) was the following organization integrating the affiliated organization on April 1914. Imperialist Japan regarded Dongjehoe as the same organization of Ganminhoe and put pressure on China to dissolve it at last. On December 1917, 149 people with Jung An-lip(鄭安立) petitioned China government for the establishment of Organization for Dongsung Korean Livelihood (東省韓族生計會). This organization included various national activities not only from Ganminhoe on included but Nongmuhoe. China regarded this organization as Korean Independent Organization and Japan also thought it as the secret organization for Independence. In short, the formation and dissolution of the succeeding organization after the dissolution of Ganminhoe shows us the will of self-government and the restoration of the national power, but it also reflects the process of the fail of the trial by China and Japan like the change of the preceding organizations of North-Gando Ganminhoe.