http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
개별검색 DB통합검색이 안되는 DB는 DB아이콘을 클릭하여 이용하실 수 있습니다.
통계정보 및 조사
예술 / 패션
<해외전자자료 이용권한 안내>
- 이용 대상 : RISS의 모든 해외전자자료는 교수, 강사, 대학(원)생, 연구원, 대학직원에 한하여(로그인 필수) 이용 가능
- 구독대학 소속 이용자: RISS 해외전자자료 통합검색 및 등록된 대학IP 대역 내에서 24시간 무료 이용
- 미구독대학 소속 이용자: RISS 해외전자자료 통합검색을 통한 오후 4시~익일 오전 9시 무료 이용
※ 단, EBSCO ASC/BSC(오후 5시~익일 오전 9시 무료 이용)
In this study I collectively thought of the form, composition, its meaning and function about the interrogatives of modern Mongolian. In addition I did contrastive study of modern Mongolian and Korean interrogatives on the basis of the result from the research. I made a contrastive analysis about what kinds of similarities and differences they have and it allowed me to present the basic datum for developing the teaching materials and plans, the correct interrogatives usages showed very importantly in the conversation and the context of both Korean learners and Mongolian learners. Some examples have similar usage in the case of interrogatives overlap usage, various grammar component happened by different place in a sentence and have differences in Korean interrogative modification(abbreviation). A certain interrogatives in Korean as well as modern Mongolian doesn`t have just one meaning, one function. So it can be figured out variously in the situation of the context, surroundings, the speaking circumstance.
New Korean national curriculum was announced in 2015. This curriculum followed the framework of the 1st curriculum and reflected on the research result of Korean education`s theory and reality. We now have to reflect on the 2015 curriculum`s revision process and start future-oriented discussion for the next curriculum revision. This paper looks at how general idea and purpose of Korean education are formed, and it provides agenda for professionals to review. First, related to general idea of the ``Korean`` subject, topics on morality and community spirit were passed on to the introduction of the national curriculum, and they were depicted again in order to highlight the characteristics of ``Korean`` subject. Second, related to the purpose of Korean education, functions of general purpose and detailed objectives are divided and it was depicted again based on the axis of ``thinking-communication-culture`` and ``knowledge- skill-attitude``. After constructive discussion on the Korean education, I only hope for the technical and perfunctory guideline adjustments when national-level curriculum revision takes part.