국어국문학 연구와 함께한 반교어문학회 30년 ; 고전시가 분야에 대한 회고와 전망 -향가, 고려가요, 시조, 가사를 중심으로

육민수 ( Min Su Yook ) 반교어문학회 2012 반교어문연구 Vol.0 No.32

The society of Bangyo language and literature has established eye-opening study results from many fields such as Korean language and literature for 30 years since it was founded in 1981. The journal of The society of Bangyo language and literature- Journal of Bangyo language and literature has been positioned a pivotal journal in the field of Korean language and literature by the continuous publication during the period from its first edition at 1988 to the present. The purpose of this article is to take a view of study results of the field of classical Korean poetry especially Hyangga, Koryeo-gayo, Sijo and Gasa included in Journal of Bangyo language and literature. Based on the view, I try to forecast its progressive point.

국어국문학 연구와 함께한 반교어문학회 30년 ; 고전 산문 연구의 조명과 지평

최진형 ( Jin Hyung Choi ) 반교어문학회 2012 반교어문연구 Vol.0 No.32

The purpose of this research is to survey former researches and to take a view of the direction of later researches through analyzing study trends on the field of classical prose among many branches of classical literary researches. The main branches of the classical literature are classical prose and verse, the branch of classical prose could be devided into the branches of oral literature, literature written by Chinese and classical novels once again. I select 61 theses appropriated to the three fields from the theses included in between Journal of Bangyo language and literature vol. 1 and vol. 31. I analyzed the theses by the each sides of general conditions, branches and themes so I could have examined closely the study trends of each fields. In addition, I suggest some problems which are founded through the process of analysis. I consider that management of The society of Bangyo language and literature and the publication of its journal can take a major step forward if correct and compensate the problems properly.

국어국문학 연구와 함께한 반교어문학회 30년 ; 한국 현대시 연구의 성과와 전망 -운명과 혁명, 왜, 아직도 임화와 김수영인가?

박지영 ( Ji Young Park ) 반교어문학회 2012 반교어문연구 Vol.0 No.32

This study aims to summarize the achievements and limitations of the researches on Korean Modern poetry that have been conducted up to recent times from the 1990s. To overcome such limitations, this study tries to present new Korean Modern poetry research methods through the current researches on Im Hwa`s and Kim Sooyoung`s poetry. These two poets are chosen because they are the primary research subjects who can open new prospects in the field of spiritual history combined with context research, which should be pursued by Korean Modern poetry. To illustrate, the research on these two revolutionary poets` conversion has been conducted in the context of conversion literature history in the history of Korean Modern literature. Contemporary Korean poetry research has been carried out within the paradigm of modernity (post-modernity) research, but it has shunned the empirical studies of context, such as media research, a major research tendency of Korean Modern literature. Although the researches on Japanese Proletariat poetry, translation, and language have some achievements, the research on Korean Modern poetry fails to pioneer a new methodology in the field of poetic literary history, thus simply accepting the methodologies of other genres. Such problem is partially caused by the fact that the research on Korean Modern poetry still focuses on the theories of literary works and writers. Therefore, the future research on Korean Modern poetry should be a research on spiritual poetic history and should be coupled with the empirical analysis of text and context. This will also be among the major themes of future Korean studies.

국어국문학 연구와 함께한 반교어문학회 30년 ; 세 척의 함선 세 곳의 행선지 -2010년대, 문학 연구의 향배

이경돈 ( Kyeong Don Lee ) 반교어문학회 2012 반교어문연구 Vol.0 No.32

Recently, the study of Korean modern literature has been changed very fast. Three historical factors cause the changes in Korean Literature. The three factors were the Regime of 1987, the Composition of 1990, and the Situation of early new epoch. The study of literature has almost vanished but it doesn`t mean all is gone. The study on the literature system, the textology(textwissenshaft) and the cultural study rise as new and radical ways of literature studies. So we can understand all these three studies are headed for radical adventures. The study on the literature system focuses on the circumstances which make the literature. The textology means the study about the text - it is woven for some purposes not only in literature but also beyond literaturefor example tales, movies, advertisements, historical stories, web text and so on. The cultural study intends to study the real life of the people and thus tries to mix history and literature. These three tendencies are getting entangled and weaving, so it makes the feature of the study on the Korean literature early new epoch.

잡지 『노동해방문학』의 노동자문학회 시 연구

허요한 ( Heo Yo Han ) 반교어문학회 2025 반교어문연구 Vol.- No.71

This study examines the representation and literary-historical significance of labor literature in the 1980s and 1990s, focusing on poems by the Workers’ Literature Association published in Nodonghaebangmunhak. As a nationwide platform, the magazine played a meaningful role in raising awareness of the Association’s activities and in expanding regional literary movements into a national phenomenon. The Association’s writings functioned as a form of self-representation for the working class, challenging the established modern literary order under the banner of labor emancipation. Furthermore, the Association connected the universal ideal of working-class liberation with local popular events, reconstructing the history of struggles for popular emancipation and broadening the social and historical significance of labor literature.

『반교어문연구』 제16집 심사 경위

학회자료 반교어문학회 2004 반교어문연구 Vol.16 No.-

규방문화권에서의 고소설 향유 양상 - <자치가>를 중심으로 -

최진형 ( Jin Hyung Choi ) 반교어문학회 2004 반교어문연구 Vol.16 No.-

이상 시에 나타난 권태 고찰

남정희 ( Jeong Hee Nam ) 반교어문학회 2004 반교어문연구 Vol.16 No.-

浮來島'전승의 原初的 意味와 習合樣相 : 古代傳承을 중심으로 한 共詩的 考察

金文泰 반교어문학회 1988 泮橋語文硏究 Vol.1 No.-

대학 글쓰기 교육과 계열별 글쓰기 ; 논증적 글쓰기 교육에 대한 비판적 고찰

김병구 ( Byeong Goo Kim ) 반교어문학회 2009 반교어문연구 Vol.0 No.27

This thesis intends to clarify that the argumentative writing education, which have a dominant tendancy of writing education in university, needs to be approched by the poitnt of view of `public writing` education that is based on the logic of persuasion. The main points of this thesis are as follows. First, I intended to make clear why the argumentative writing in the writing education in university anew is stressed. Recently the context that the argumentative writing is stressed the argumentative writing in the writing education in university have the same way of doing the context that stress why the education of `critical thinking` is important. Through the consideration of these contexts, I intend to present why now must be the argumentative writing education and what the argumentative writing`s value in the writing education in university is. Second, I critically argued about a problems that the latest discourse which stress the argumentative writing education which is based on the critical thinking have. Paticularly I focused problem-solving` writing which is presented a argumentative writing`s standard, so I did confirm the theoretical basis that the education about problem-solving` writing must be united into the frame of writing education. Third, I intended to make clear that there is the similar repetition between critical thinking and writing ability. So the argumentative writing is not represented by writing education for the critical thinking. It is possible that the critical thinking can be united in the frame of writing education, if the rhetoric is imported in the process of public writing education which is based on the logic of persuasion.