독일의 사회주택과 사회주택지원제도에 관한 연구

황명찬 건국대학교 사회과학연구소 2001 社會科學論叢 Vol.25 No.-

高度情報化社會에 있어서 地方行政과 市民

崔昌浩,朱文培 建國大學校 社會科學硏究所 1997 社會科學論叢 Vol.2 No.-

10.28 건대항쟁의 정치사적 의미 : Implications in Korean politocal history

한정일 건국대학교 사회과학연구소 2001 社會科學論叢 Vol.25 No.-

10.28 Student Uprising at KonKuk University (10.28 KonKuk Uprising) occurred in October 28, 1986. In spite of its significant implications in Korean political history, not much attention has been paid to it. This article attempts to reassess its historical implications in the context of political development of Korea. This article also goes back over some influential students movements over the world so as to reach a conclusion that students movements have played a role as a mediator as well as an initiator of social change. Korea was not an exception. While Korea had achieved the rapid economic growth, all of national resources and focuses of government policies were concentrated or two priorities: economic growth and anti-communism. Any social movements and ideologies that were not compatible with the national priorities were not tolerated by military regimes. If happened, those kinds of social movements and ideologies have blindly bombarded with criticism and suppression by government, mass media, and even intellectuals. Under such social and political environments, students movements have been suppressed in many ways. This article describes the quandary of students movements during 1980s in Korea. Anti-America mood originated from the resistance against the violent suppression over 5.18 Citizen Uprising of 1980 was culminated in 1985. Right after the Seoul Asian Game of 1986, violent suppression over democracy-movement was remarkably increased. The moment of 10.28 KonKuk Uprising was the culmination of the blind suppression and criticism over student movement. As the result of the 10.28 KonKuk Uprising, 1,525 students were arrested and 1,288 were indicted, which is much greater number of the indicted, 616 students at the Student Uprising of Tokyo University in 1969. Students Coalition For Anti-Imperialism and Anti-Dictatorship (called Ae-Hak-Tu-Ryun) was going to celebrate its launch at KonKuk University. Before the coalition, several different student organizations had led student movements in the name of anti-military dictatorship and anti-imperialism. Their movements were sometimes violent and isolated from the public sentiments. Thus, they established "Ae-Hak-Tu-Ryun" as an united organization and had the first meeting at KonKuk University in October 28, 1986. Ae-Hak-Tu-Ryun set its goals: anti-imperialism (by Japan and America), anti-military dictatorship (President Chun, Du-Hwan), unification between south-north Korea, enhancement of democracy and human rights, reform of education. Chun's military regime saw the meeting of "Ae-Hak-Tu-Ryun" at KonKuk University as a chance to effectively suppress student movements. The Supreme Public Prosecutor's Office, Justice Minister, and Prime Minister announced that "Ae-Hak-Tu-Ryun" under the control of North Korea illegally occupied KonKuk University. Police violently suppressed and arrested students who hid themselves separately in buildings of the University for four days. This article analyzes the background of the "Ae-Hak-Tu-Ryun" event and concludes that Chun's military regime took advantage of the launch meeting of "Ae-Hak-Tu-Ryun" as a chance of massive suppression over student movements on purpose. At the same time, this article points out that student movements were too isolated from the public. Student movements, for example still stuck to ideological debate and radical (violent) action that were used in the cold-war age. Specifically, this article criticizes "Ae-Hak-Tu-Ryun" should not have used too radical (leftist) handouts and catch-Phrases that North Korea often had used. In spite of its some problems and naivete, this article concludes that 10.28 KonKuk Uprising plays a role as a mediator between 5.18 KwangJu Uprising in 1980 and 6.10 Citizen Uprising in 1987 so that it contributes to political development in Korea.

거버넌스이론의 이데올로기성 비판

윤정길,강황선 건국대학교 사회과학연구소 2001 社會科學論叢 Vol.25 No.-

Governance is a widely supported and accepted concept in the political and administrative system of the world. It refers to a managerial mechanism and also a philosophy in those arenas. This article goes over the concept theoretically in a holistic perspective in order to explore its fundamental principles. This article pinpoints the deterministic nature of the concept. Since the concept was born and developed by other western and developed countries, it may be inevitable that the concept has been well geared to those countries. This article argues that any countries and governments should be able to discern their own not only peculiarities of political and administrative system, but also those of civil society and its capacity to deal with public affairs as a partner of governments. Many influential studies on governance are discussed and analyzed so as to highlight its relativity. The authors explain main activities, coordinators between various stakeholders, and the role of stakeholders in governance system and emphasize the relative nature of the interface between stakeholders of governance system. This article tries to contribute to more stable adaptation of the theory of governance in Korea

지방자치단체의 지식산업 구축방안에 관한 연구

이은재 건국대학교 사회과학연구소 2000 社會科學論叢 Vol.24 No.-

서구 정치사상과 정치 지도자의문제

황주홍 건국대학교 사회과학연구소 2002 社會科學論叢 Vol.26 No.-

여성공무원의 활용방안

이은재 건국대학교 사회과학연구소 2002 社會科學論叢 Vol.26 No.-

John Stuart Mill의 사회적 자유주의론

허재일,이재호 建國大學校 社會科學硏究所 1998 社會科學論叢 Vol.3 No.-

England at the time of J.S. Mill, a theorist and actionist for liberty, was undertaking a period of change which was needed thinkings and actions by a concience as time protesting to the customary oppression and religions. In this situation, when we unerstand social conditions, as the results of social activist's judgement and acitions, the effort of Mill to find key factors for solving the problems from the social norms which regulate human actions and judgements may have sufficient basis theoretically and practically. To understand Mill on any issue we need to know, among other things, how he contextualized the subject in his whole theory, his notion of the spirit of the age, his view of the epoch's place in the history of mankind and how he saw his own ideas, prescriptions, and actions as contributing to human development. I shall argue in support of several propositions. First, that within the primary source marterial on Mill's life there is evidence to support many of the available inter-preations. Second, that there were some unresolved tensions, incoherences, inconsistences, and even contradictions within Mill's corpus that recent ‘defences’of Mill have failed to remove. But thidrly, we can still trace several linking threads, even a coherence, thought Mill's work on liberty and democracy once we contextualize each of Mill's works and assign it a place in his overall history of ideas, his notion of his own place in intellectual history and the progress of civilization. Finally, Mill's liberalism is transitional in character. While his arguments retain a commitment to individualism and a laissez-faire approach, his exposure to alien ideas and his growing awareness of history brought him to a new of individuals and society as progressive beings. Mill, we may conclude, was a transitional thinker between old and new, laissez-faire and collectivist forms of liberalism, who imposed a perfectionist teleology of progress upon liberalism. True liberty, to Mill, was concerned with the full development fo the self and society, the cultivation fo man ‘as a progress being.’Hence the state's encouragement and even legal enforcement of independence, self-development, and self-control. It may have been left to Green and Hobhouse to add to the list of actions government could take to create the social conditions for self-realization, but Mill had prepared the way.

복지정책과 사회정의 : 배분정의를 중심으로 focus on the distributive justice

윤정길,김만배 건국대학교 사회과학연구소 1999 社會科學論叢 Vol.23 No.-

The prime purpose of this study is to theoretically define and descriptive explain the model of social justice to welfare policies. The government is concerned with allocating resources among citizens. Indeed, the major function of the government is to allocate resources among citizens through its role as the managers of welfare policies. Because of the necessity of the consideration of distributive justice for the welfare policies and the government in securing the success of the welfare policies and the wholesome functioning of the government, its essential for welfare administrators and welfare policy managers to understand how social justice to welfare policies through which they receive benefits and bear burdens from the governments. Although some comments on the significance of fairness as a determinant of justice philosophers to the welfare policies can be traced to the works of Aristole, full-length debates on the issue of fairness are found in recent justice-related theories including relative deprivation theory and equity theory. Justice judgments subsume some kinds of justice norms as criteria of fairness. Justice norms are social prescriptions or prohibitions that a community uses to create fair relations among its members. Generally, two categories of justice norms have been distinguished: distributive justice norms, i.e., the fairness criteria of the outcomes received; and procedural justice norm, i.e., the fairness criterion of the procedure by which the outcomes are distributed. In this study four distinct distributive justice norms and a procedural justice norm are considered. The five justice norm can be summarized as follows. The first norm is Equity: All community members deserve equal amounts of divisible resources. Alternatively, communing members should be required to bear equal burdens when necessary. The second norm is Need: All needs of community members deserve equal satisfaction alternatively, community members should sacrifice equal amounts of satisfaction. The third norm is Merit: Community members deserve rewards in proportion to what they contribute to the community. The fourth norm is Ascription: Community members deserve rewards according to relevant ascriptive traits, such as age, sex, class, region, family connection, or school connection. The last norm is Procedure: The procedural justice norm does not seek patterned fair results procedural justice can be thought of as pertaining to the perceived fairness of rules which govern welfare policy process, such as consistency across time and person, suppression of biases, accuracy of information, correctability of a decision, representativeness in a decision-making body and the maintenance of ethical and moral standards.

21세기 후기 관료제에 관한 연구

이은재 건국대학교 사회과학연구소 1999 社會科學論叢 Vol.23 No.-

The time of 21 century is a chaos era. It is greeting the information society today from the industry society in the 1970's. The movement of administration reform started from the time of declining traditional Bureaucracy in the 1980's, and the new public management(NPM) appeared as a new paradigm. As a result, the traditional bureaucracy as an important role in the industry society declined, the post-bureaucracy is appearing as a new paradigm. This study examines the collapse of traditional bureaucracy according to the change of situation, the NPM which appeared as a new paradigm, the TQM by Deming, and foresees the bureaucracy organization in the future. This study explains the collapse of bureaucracy which played an important role in the industry society in chapter Ⅱ, the NPM which started from Administration reform in the 1980's in chapter Ⅲ, The change and contents of the post-bureaucracy in chapter IV, and the change and demand of a new bureaucracy organization according to the collapse of the traditional bureaucracy, and show the 21 Century post-bureaucracy in Chapter V. The Future society will operated in the uncertainty according to the environment change, the intensify of Competitive power and the complexity of enterprise environment. In this situation, Organization should cope with the civil participant, the demand of civil, and changing environment instantly.