러시아어 화자들의 중간언어 음운 연구

윤영해 ( Yoon Young Hae ) 한국언어문화교육학회 2006 언어와 문화 Vol.2 No.2

This treatise analyzes Russian speakers’ pronunciation errors in learning Korean, aiming to clarify the phenomenon and reason of phonemes of their interlanguage. To begin with, it predicts the difficulties of pronouncing by means of contrast analysis and analyses Russian speakers’ practical pronunciation errors, there by examining diverse variations which appear in the intermediate stage, that is, the patterns of interlanguage. This treatise considers the reason of interlanguage based on analysis and skills. The individual phoneme is much interfered from the mother tongue. (Seoul Women’s University)

중간언어 음운연구를 바탕으로 한 발음교육의 효과 연구 -중국인 화자들의 받침 발음을 중심으로-

윤영해 ( Young Hae Yoon ) 국제한국어교육학회 2008 한국어 교육 Vol.19 No.2

The purpose of this study is to research characteristic and cause of phoneme of interlanguage by analyzing the consonant pronunciation mistake of Chinese speaker, who studies Korean language and survey the effect of pronunciation education and change of interlanguage on the basis of it. From the aspect of government phonology, English and Korean language belong to the language that permits empty nucleus in the end of syllable but Chinese language belongs to the language that does not permit empty nucleus. Therefore, syllabic structures of both languages are different. From the result of contrastive analysis, Chinese learners, who are familiar with the language without consonant, have difficulties in pronunciation and recognition of Korean language with consonant. It was possible to predict that they will make mistakes in the pronunciation of Korean consonant and it was found that there were many mistakes in actual experiment, The study compared the effect of pronunciation education on the basis of interlanguage to that of general education. It was found that the pronunciation education, which was adjusted for Chinese learner`s mistake on the basis of interlanguage, was effective to some extent.

언어보편성에 기반을 둔 한국어 학습자들의 중간언어 이중모음 연구 -중국어, 몽골어 화자를 중심으로-

윤영해(Yoon, Young-hae) 우리말글학회 2020 우리말 글 Vol.84 No.-

본 연구의 목적은 한국어 학습자들의 중간언어 이중모음의 발음 양상을 언어보편성에 기반을 두고 설명하는 데 있다. 중국어 화자들과 몽골어 화자들의 이중모음 발음의 양상을 구성원소의 결합과 분해의 작용으로 분석하여 그 안에 나타나는 언어보편적인 특성을 살펴보고자 하였다. 중국어 화자들은 중국어 음절구조의 영향으로 두 개의 모음으로 분리해서 발음하려는 경향이 두드러졌고 몽골어 화자들은 몽골어 음절구조의 영향으로 단모음으로 발음하려는 경향이 두드러지게 나타났다. 이를 통해 중국어 화자와 몽골어 화자 모두 이중모음을 발음할 때 조정(수정)을 하는 것을 확인할 수 있었다. 또한 무표적인 것보다 유표적인 것을 더디 습득하고 조정 즉 수정을 더 많이 한다는 사실을 알 수 있었다. 즉, 언어 보편적인 특성이 한국어 학습자들의 중간언어 이중모음의 발음에도 적용됨을 확인할 수 있었다. The purpose of this study is to explain the pronunciation patterns of Korean learners" interlanguage diphthong based on language Universal. The patterns of the diphthong pronunciation of Chinese speakers and Mongolian speakers are analyzed by the composition and decomposition of the elements. We wanted to look at language Universal in the pronunciation of the interlanguage diphthong. The Chinese speakers tried to pronounce it in two separate vowels under the influence of the Chinese syllable structure. Mongolian speakers tried to pronounce in monothong under the influence of Mongolian syllable structure. This shows that Chinese speakers and Mongolian speakers modify when pronouncing diphthong. And we could see that they acquire and modify more of the marked than the unmarked. In other words, we could see that the language universal are applied to the pronunciation of a interlanguage diphthong by Korean learners.

Postmodernity and the Buddhist Studies of Ecology - Joanna Macy"s Ecological Self and Buddhist Self-Denial

Yoon Young-Hae(윤영해) 불교학연구회 2006 불교학연구 Vol.15 No.-

  Jacques Derrida (1930~2004) is in the front line of postmodernistic challenges and deconstruction philosophy which is his main ideology. Derrida"s deconstructionism is the deconstruction of the absolute from the center and in the center of the subject of which must be deconstructed is the absolute, modern self-definition which has the aspects of uniformity and standardization.<BR>  Joanna Macy criticized modern self-definition in her thesis "The Ecological Self: Postmodern Ground for Right Action" and advocates ecological self with a postmodernistic vision.<BR>  She uses the modernistic self-concept in the same context with Buddhist self denial and moreover, she advocates ecological self-understanding based on Buddhist non-self and dependent origination. She also makes it clear that the ecological self-understanding and its practical model that she has suggested are based on postmodernism. Hence, it has been verified that eco-Buddhism uses the same grammar with postmodernistic ecology.<BR>  Macy"s ecological self-theory can only be in the same context with Buddhist bodhisattva. Her theory concludes with an action plan while in Buddhism the Buddhist self-denial can only be concluded with its practical usage of the bodhi"s charity performance.<BR>  The ecological practices as an ethical duty based on modern self-concept can only draw a line of demarcation between oneself and others and eventually can not function as a complete ecological idealism. Therefore, Macy emphasizes the best alternative solution for the current ecological crisis, which is to take action based on the ecological self-understanding that takes the same stance as Buddhist self-denial, dependent origination and bodhisattva.   포스트모던적 도전의 선봉에 데리다(Derrida, Jacques, 1930~2004)가 있으며 그의 중심사상을 해체철학이라 부른다. 데리다의 해체주의는 중심으로서의 절대의 해체이며 그 해체되어야 할 대상의 중심에 절대와 획일과 보편적 성격을 갖는 근대적 자아개념이 자리 잡고 있다.<BR>  조안나 메이시(Joanna Macy)는 자신의 논문 “생태학적 자아: 올바른 실천을 위한 포스트모던적 기반”에서 이 근대적 자아개념을 비판하고 포스트모던적 비전으로서 생태학적 자아를 주창한다.<BR>  메이시는 불교의 자아부정과 동일한 논리체계로써 근대적 자아의 개념을 용도폐기하고, 나아가 불교의 무아설과 연기법에 근거한 생태학적 자아이해를 주창한다. 또한 자신이 제시한 생태학적 자아이해와 그 실천적 모형이 포스트모더니즘에 근거하고 있음도 명백히 한다. 이로써 생태불교학은 포스트모던적 생태학과 그 논리체계를 같이 하고 있음이 확인된다.<BR>  메이시의 생태학적 자아이론은 불교의 보살론과 맥을 같이 할 수밖에 없다. 조안나 메이시의 이론은 실천으로 결론을 삼고 있으며 불교의 자아부정은 그것의 실천인 보살의 자비행으로 결론지을 수밖에 없기 때문이다.<BR>  근대적 자아개념에 근거한 윤리적 의무로서의 생태적 실천은 자타의 분립을 피할 수 없으며, 이는 결코 온전한 생태적 이상으로 기능할 수 없다. 따라서 메이시는 불교의 자아부정, 연기법 및 보살론과 맥을 같이하는 생태학적 자아이해와 이에 근거한 실천만이 오늘의 생태위기에 대한 최선의 대안임을 역설한다.

기독교와 불교의 인간과 자연의 관계

윤영해(Young Hae Yoon) 동국대학교 불교문화연구원 2005 佛敎學報 Vol.- No.42

한국어 학습자의 중간언어 보편성 연구 -중국어, 태국어, 일본어 화자의 종성 발음의 양상을 중심으로-

윤영해 ( Young-hae Yoon ) 한국외국어대학교 언어연구소 2016 언어와 언어학 Vol.0 No.72

This study confirms the language universals that are maintained in the interlanguage of learners by analyzing final consonant pronunciation in Korean spoken by Chinese, Thai, and Japanese speakers who study Korean as a second language. According to the Structural Conformity Hypothesis, the universal concepts of primary languages also apply to interlanguage. Interlanguage shows fewer marked structures for target words with marked structures, which means that learners prefer unmarked structures. Neutralization that appears in the final consonant in Korean is a marked characteristic, and as such, it is difficult for Korean language learners to learn. An analysis of learners` pronunciation of obstruent final consonants in Korean shows that Chinese speakers omit the final consonant, whereas Thai speakers pronounce all final consonants except /ㄹ/ when applying the neutralization rule. Japanese speakers combine vowels . This is the result of modifying the marked target word to a less marked structure. These results show that language universals are maintained in learners` interlanguage.

영역말 빈 핵의 승인제약에 따른 한국어 종성 분석 -중국인, 일본인 학습자들의 중간언어 종성 발음을 중심으로-

윤영해 ( Young Hae Yoon ) 한국외국어대학교 언어연구소 2015 언어와 언어학 Vol.0 No.66

This paper aims to analyze the interlanguage among chinese and Japanese speakers based on constraint of final empty nucleus. According to Government Phonology, Korean and Chinese are categorized as languages that license domain-final empty nucleus. In contrast, Japanese does not license it. Onset must be licensed for licensed domain-final empty nucleus. The degree to which domain-final empty nucleus is licensed differs between Korean and Chinese speakers. This results interlanguage pronunciation of the final consonant of the Korean words from Chinese speakers different from Korean speakers. Chinese speakers do not pronounce final consonant /ㄱ, ㄷ, ㅂ/. As a result lengthening takes place. Japanese does not license domain-final empty nucleus. When Japanese speakers pronounce final consonant, they try to fill the cold vowel "v" in combination with the element U. This is because of the differences in the constraint on final empty nucleus in languages.

유교와 도교, 그리고 불교의 다원주의 가능성

윤영해(Yoon Young Hae) 불교학연구회 2002 불교학연구 Vol.5 No.-

  Far eastern Asia has been multi-religious society. Especially Korea is called a department of religions. In multi-religious society, troubles among religions are inevitable. But the far eastern society has experienced religious troubles not in radical level. This is due to the religious inclusivism of Buddhism, Taoism, and Confucianism which were main religious tradition of this area.<BR>  The causes of troubles between religions are diverse but mainly attributable to the religious exclusivism, The religious inclusivism regards their own faith as the best and others" as inferior, but does not consider other religions to be destroyed completely. Indebted to this religious inclusivism of them, Buddhism, Taoism and Confucianism stimulate and respond each other and can be developed by the name of "three religions, but one teaching(三敎合一論).<BR>  But religious inclusivism can"t make ultimate reconciliate or agreement. We can notice this by the fact that three religions of the far eastern Asia go on making troubles, conflicting and being hostile to each other.<BR>  The ultimate religious reconciliate or agreement can be accomplished only by multi-religious pluralism. Multi-religious pluralism admit others as it is. But at the same time it.

일반 논문 : 중심주의의 해체와 한국불교의 생태윤리 실천

윤영해 ( Young Hae Yoon ) 한국환경철학회 2011 환경철학 Vol.0 No.12

오늘의 생태위기는 단순히 기술공학이나 혹은 정책전환으로 해결할 수 있는 문제가 아니라 더 본질적이고 근본적인 문제, 즉 사상과 가치관에 대한 전환 없이는 극복될 수 없는 문제이다. 세계의 중심으로서 실체적 자아를 갖는 인간을 상정한다는 점에서 모더니즘과 기독교의 세계관은 일치한다. 그러나 생태학적 위기의 극복이라는이 시대 최대 과제는 인간중심주의적 사고에 대한 대대적인 방향전환을 요구하고 있다. 이 논문은 생태위기의 뿌리로서 기독교와 모더니즘의 인간중심주의를 재확인하고, 이를 해체하는 전범(典範)으로서 불교의 무아(無我)사상과 연기법(緣起法)법을 고찰한다. 또한 실체적 자아개념의 해체를 바로인간중심주의의 해체로 보며, 나아가 모든 중심주의의의 해체로 원용될 가능성으로 본다. 이러한 불교의 생태윤리 이론이 역사의 현장에서 실제로 어떻게 얼마만큼 실천되고 있느냐는 문제도 하나의 관심사이다. 이런 관점에서 제 Ⅳ장, 불교적 생태윤리의 실천에서는 한국불교의 생태 윤리적 실천의 구체적 내용을 검토한다. 결론적으로, 이 논문은 기독교나 모더니즘의 인간중심주의뿐만 아니라 그간 차례대로 제시되어 온 환경윤리 이론들 중 모든 중심주의의 위험을 일깨운다. 불교의 생태윤리는 주(主)와 반(伴), 즉 중심과 환경이 고정되거나 치우치지 않는 공존과 공생으로서의 전체성향적(全體性向的, holotropic), 혹은 세계를 하나의 유기적 생명체로 바라보는 동체대비(同體大悲)적 세계인식에 근거한 윤리다. Today`s environmental crisis is not a simple problem to be resolved by an engineering marble or policy switch, but a fundamental problem which will never be able to be resolved without entire change of thought and value system. In placing humans endowed with reason at the center of the world, and relegating nature that lacks reason to a peripheral position subordinate to humans, modern thought essentially shared the same anthropocentric outlook as Christianity. The ecological crisis, the foremost challenge we face today, calls for a radical departure from this anthropocentric way of thinking. This article will examine the Buddhist notion of no-self and the doctrine of dependent-arising as a prime way to overcome anthropocentrism by deconstructing the substantive notion of self and other forms of the centric way of thinking. I will then conclude this article by examining how this Buddhist approach to ecological ethics is actually being put into practice by those engaged in Buddhist ecological movements in Korea today. Through the insights provided by wisdom and through the practice of great compassion, Buddhist ecological ethics seeks to overcome the anthropocentrism that is deeply rooted in our way of thinking and lives by freeing us from the dichotomous view of reality that divides the world into subject and object, center and periphery, and humans and nature.

중국어, 일본어 화자들의 중간언어 음운 연구 : 지배 음운론적 관점에서 본 한국어 받침 발음을 중심으로

윤영해(Young-hae Yoon) 한국외국어대학교 외국어 종합연구센터 언어연구소 2007 언어와 언어학 Vol.0 No.39

As a view of government phonology, this thesis analyzes interlanguage phenomenon that is frequently misused by Chinese and Japanese when they learn Korean. The interlanguage phonology is able to divide into segment, sound alteration, syllabic structure. The aspect of inter-language can be verified by observing errors which are appeared each part of phonology. Errors, that are occurred when foreigners speak the Korean consonant and when speaking the segment-sound (the double-vowel /ㅖ/ and the singular-vowel /ㅐ/), are explained by syllable-structure and element of governmental phonology. Japanese and Chinese have a fundamentally different syllable- structure because they don't speak the domain-final empty nucleus. So they often make errors when they speak Korean by excepting Korean consonant or inserting the vowel /ㅡ/. These errors appear when speaking Korean by changing construction elements to follow Chinese phoneme- system because, in the segment, phoneme-system isn't same between Korean and Chinese.