http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : Yoo, Jae-Hoon (검색결과 98,734 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
유철호(Chul-Ho Yoo),김남일(Nam-Il Kim) 한국의사학회 2012 한국의사학회지 Vol.25 No.2
A thesis insisting that Sugjong’s medical doctor Yoo Itae(劉以泰) and the author of Marjinpyeon Yoo Itae(劉爾泰) are not a same person and his activities were in Heonjong(현종) period, and his writing Marjinpyeon is in 1846, is published. In this study, I’d like to reveal that Yoo Itae(劉爾泰), the Marjinpyeon’s author and Yoo Itae(劉以泰), Sugjong’s medical doctor are a same person through analysis of Geochang Yoo’s genealogy, articles, The True Record of the Joseon Dynasty, Seungjeonilgi, Taeweonseonsaengan, Sancheong-gun’s paper, Sancheong Hyanggyo’s paper, Sancheong-gun’s paper, The geographic paper, Dongyuhagan, Sawoo Munjib, and analysis of folk story, the wrote year of his Marjinpyeon and Inseomunkyunrok and his birth year. According to my analysis, Yoo Itae(劉爾泰) the Maninpyeon’s author and Yoo Itae(劉以泰), Sugjong’s medical doctor are a same person. And Marjinpyeon is written in 1696, the year of Byongja, and other his books, InseoMungyonlok at 1709, the year of Gichug. In conclusion, Yoo Itae(劉以泰劉爾泰) was a famous medical doctor at Sancheong, born in 1652 (HyoJong the 3rd year) and passed in 1715 (SugJong the 41th year), left books of Marjinpyeon, Silheomdanbang, and Inseomunkyunrok.
-
-
-
김유진(Kim, Yoo-jin) 한국아동청소년문학학회 2021 아동청소년문학연구 Vol.- No.28
이 연구는 1960년대 동시의 형식 실험을 분석하고, 이러한 형식 실험이 추구한 동시의 현대성과 미학성의 성격을 고찰하고자 했다. 1960년대 동시의 형식 실험을 대표할 수 있는 조유로와 이석현의 작품을 분석하고, 그들의 창작이 개인의 창작론과 창작 지향에 따른 면밀한 실천임을 살펴보면서, 이것이 오늘날 동시 장르에 여전히 유효한 질문과 모색임을 분석했다. 현재 동시 장르의 새로운 형식에 대한 모색은 ‘어린이 독자’라는 아동문학 장르의 대명제 아래서 실험과 전위의 범주가 상당 부분 제한적으로 규정되며 되풀이되고 있다. 따라서 동시의 형식 실험이 가장 전위적이고 광범위하게 일어났던 1960년대의 창작 양상과 의미를 밝히는 일은 단지 특정 시대나 특정 작가의 개별 창작 시도를 문학사적으로 복원하는 데 그치지 않고 2000년대 후반부터 다시 활발해진 오늘날 동시의 창작 실험에 대한 모색과 연결되며 확장될 수 있다. In the 1960s, several children’s poets introduced various forms in their works the most in the history of children’s poetry in South Korea. Of those, Joe Yoo-ro is incomparable. He tried various forms in his six children"s poetry books published in the 1960s. Also, he clarified the underlying philosophy and purpose in the preamble of each book. Therefore, the meaning of his works can be better understood when linked to his purpose and philosophy about creation. The narrative poems of Lee Suk Hyun are also noteworthy. Lee Suk-hyun coined his second poetry book <House of echoes> (St. Paul Publisher), published in 1966, ‘a book of the narrative poems’. Lee Suk Hyun is the representative poet of creating the narrative poems in the 1960s. He also had a clear purpose of the narrative poems as a form experiment. According to the magazines and critics of children’s literature in those days, he took the creation of narrative poems very seriously in the area of the form experiment in children’s poetry, by participating in the discourse of the narrative poems or encouraging other poets such as Park Kyung-yong to create such poems. Therefore, his narrative poems should be also analyzed considering his philosophy about creation. Because the form experiment in children’s poetry has been limitedly repeated under the assumption of ‘children as readers’, the form experiment in the 1960s still contributes to the current creation practices. The examination of the creation trend and its meaning in the 1960s, the era when the form experiment in the children’s poetry was the most radical and extensive, is not just limited to a cultural and historical restoration of a specific era or a specific poet’s individual try of creation. This is related to and expands through the pursuit of the creation experiment in children’s poetry that has been revived since the late 2000s.
-
-
서해 NLL상 남북간 무력 충돌 배경과 해법에 관한 연구
Yoo,Ho-Yeol,Kim,Tae-Rae 고려대학교세종캠퍼스 공공정책연구소 2021 Journal of North Korea Studies Vol.7 No.2
In the study, we aim to analyze the background of the military policy in the armed conflicts between the two Koreas in the Yellow Sea. We also try to identify internal or mutual relations between the two Koreas. If we develop an analytical framework that can explain the process of armed conflict between the two Koreas, we will have the means for establishing an empirical and institutional mechanism that can transform inter-Korean relations into a more stable and controllable system. In the future, when armed conflict occurs in the Yellow Sea, it is possible to predict how the North s response will change, and this analytical framework may help to prevent an unnecessary escalation of a war by quickly taking countermeasures. Given that strategies and behaviors of the North Korean system are relatively consistent and predictable to some extent, it is necessary to conduct various analyses and comparative verification of the North’s provocations to understand the essence and substantive truth of their provocations. At the same time, if we fail to misjudge or learn lessons from North Korea s provocations, the North will likely continue to test us and control the overall situation on the Korean Peninsula in a harsher manner. In that term, preparing various countermeasures for North Korea s provocations against South Korea is very necessary, and it may contribute to resolving the North s provocation itself. The possibility of North Korea s numerous provocations in the Yellow Sea still exists, but the systematic analysis through the flow and context of the times will help us identify the military and political strategies inherent in them. As we prepare for a more concrete and realistic response to the North s intention to dilute and utilize provocations against the South through deceptions, it will eventually be possible to ease tensions between the two Koreas and build trust through the virtuous cycle.
-
-
-
-
ScienceON
스콜라연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
