http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : Luís Carvalho Lourenço (검색결과 1 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
Endoscopy Timing in Patients with Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding
Gonçalo Alexandrino,Tiago Dias Domingues,Rita Carvalho,Mariana Nuno Costa,Luís Carvalho Lourenço,Jorge Reis 대한소화기내시경학회 2019 Clinical Endoscopy Vol.52 No.1
Background/Aims: The role of very early (≤12 hours) endoscopy in nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding is controversial. We aimed to compare results of very early and early (12–24 hours) endoscopy in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleedingdemonstrating low-risk versus high-risk features and nonvariceal versus variceal bleeding. Methods: This retrospective study included patients with nonvariceal and variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. The primaryoutcome was a composite of inpatient death, rebleeding, or need for surgery or intensive care unit admission. Endoscopy timing wasdefined as very early and early. We performed the analysis in two subgroups: (1) high-risk vs. low-risk patients and (2) variceal vs. nonvariceal bleeding. Results: A total of 102 patients were included, of whom 59.8% underwent urgent endoscopy. Patients who underwent very earlyendoscopy received endoscopic therapy more frequently (p=0.001), but there was no improvement in other clinical outcomes. Furthermore, patients at low risk and with nonvariceal bleeding who underwent very early endoscopy had a higher risk of thecomposite outcome. Conclusions: Very early endoscopy does not seem to be associated with improved clinical outcomes and may lead to poorer outcomesin specific populations with upper gastrointestinal bleeding. The actual benefit of very early endoscopy remains controversial andshould be further clarified.
연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
